Meeting
of the BIO Advisory Committee
Summary Minutes
April 25-26, 2002
THURSDAY, APRIL 25th
Welcome and Introduction of New Member: Dr. Mary E. Clutter, Assistant Director
Dr.
Clutter welcomed the committee and introduced a new member, Dr. Jerry Melillo
of the Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory at Woods Hole.
Remarks, Approval of Minutes: Dr. James Collins, Chair
The
November 8-9, 2001 minutes were approved by voice vote.
FY2003 Budget: Dr. Mary E. Clutter
Dr. Clutter reviewed the House
VA-HUD Appropriations Subcommittee hearing of April 11, 2002, and
briefed the committee on the BIO FY 2003 budget request. The BIO
request proposes a virtual division, Emerging Frontiers, partly
in response to BIO AC recommendations.
EDUCATION IN 21st CENTURY BIOLOGY
Review of Education Subcommittee Report, April 2000: Dr. Marvalee
Wake
Recommendations of the subcommittee included the need for data-gathering
on BIO educational activities; a teaching component for NSF predoctoral
and postdoctoral fellowships, and increased support for Doctoral
Dissertation Improvement Grants. The subcommittee expressed concern
regarding the US dependence on international scientists and engineers
in some areas of research and encouraged NSF and BIO to institute
programs that would reduce this dependence. Recommendations that
have been addressed include (1) development and implementation
of a BIO educational philosophy and (2) establishment of an education
subcommittee of the AC.
Current Portfolio of Activities: Dr. Mary
E. Clutter and Dr. Joann Roskoski, Executive Officer, BIO
Dr. Roskoski
presented information on NSF and BIO educational programs. A major
discussion item was program evaluation. The evaluation activities
planned as part of the Undergraduate Mentoring in Environmental
Biology (UMEB) program may serve as useful prototypes. It was noted
that the Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Social, Behavioral
and Economic Sciences (SBE) directorates have tools available to
help with evaluations.
Vision of Educational Activities at NSF: Dr. Judith Ramaley, Assistant
Director, Education and Human Resources
Dr. Ramaley presented the
EHR Directorate's vision of educational activities at NSF, including
themes of the portfolio, and strategies for improving minority
participation in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics
(STEM) programs. She noted the importance of incorporating lessons
learned from NSF diversity programs into all education programs;
women and minorities have been the indicators for overall problems
in the system. Discussion included the need to consider the educational
needs of the adult workforce - how adults learn and what knowledge
is required to prepare for new technologies. A draft career path
analysis of science, mathematics, and engineering students was
distributed.
Report on Advisory Committee on Environmental Research
and Education (AC-ERE) Activities: Dr. James Collins (BIOAC Representative)
and Dr. Joann Roskoski
A draft Decadal Plan for NSF Environmental
Research and Education describes the current environmental portfolio,
identifies ways NSF-wide integration can enhance current investments,
and identifies opportunities for future investment. The draft plan
will be released for public comment in May, 2002. The AC-ERE is
also soliciting input from other AC's, Federal agencies, and professional
societies. A report (for NSF and the scientific community) and
brochure (for the public and Congress) will be produced. Discussion
included the need for milestones for success, such as the development
of better warning of environmental and climate change, or better
restoration techniques.
Education Breakout Groups: AC members, and BIO and EHR Program
Officers
The education presentations and discussions above served
as background for breakout group discussions of education issues
by members of the AC, and BIO and EHR program officers, as summarized
below.
(1) K-12 and informal science education
Increasing BIO spending
on K-12 programs could have a significant impact without a major
dollar investment since current spending is a small proportion
of the total BIO education budget. Informal science education is
needed before the 7th grade in order to prevent losing students
who are interested in science. Ideas included television ads with
science role models, and engaging parents through citizen science
programs. Improving the science literacy of teachers by reaching
teachers at education schools, teachers out of field, and teachers
in field, was also discussed.
(2) Undergraduate education (includes community colleges)
Research
experience for undergraduates and faculty is vital. NSF should
reach out to community colleges, by helping to improve mentoring
of their students, faculty and administrators, and helping to facilitate
the transition of students to undergraduate institutions. Short
and long-term tracking of students would determine whether programs
are working - by measuring retention in the biology major and future
career success. The population of institutions that participate
in NSF programs should be broadened. The proposed Integrated Undergraduate
Education and Research Training program (IUERT) that would be open
to all colleges and universities is a good idea in principle, but
the unique challenges of primarily undergraduate institutions such
as heavy teaching load for professors, need to be considered. Current
programs might be leveraged or modified to accomplish similar goals
to the IUERT. Mentoring of underrepresented groups is critical.
(3) Graduate and postdoctoral experience
The integration of the
research and education component of proposals could be strengthened
by explicitly asking PIs to include information about the types
of training that undergraduates, graduate students and postdoctoral
fellows would receive beyond that obtained during the conduct of
a research project, such as courses in ethics, writing proposals,
management, seminar series, etc. Also noted was the need for teaching
experience for graduate students and post docs. Role models and
mentoring can help underrepresented groups. In response to the
George Jones Science editorial of April 12, 2002, it was suggested
that NSF lead an interagency working group on increasing participation
of underrepresented groups at all levels of the STEM enterprise.
It was noted that increasing the diversity of the workforce could
improve the quality of science (for example due to new perspectives,
sensitivity to environmental justice issues).
FRIDAY, APRIL 26th
PLANNING FOR 21st CENTURY BIOLOGY
BIO Science Retreat: Dr. Mary Clutter and the BIO Senior Management
Team
Dr. Clutter reviewed the revisioning process in BIO, which
is driven by the characteristics of the Biology of the 21st Century
(multidimensional, multidisciplinary, data-driven, education-oriented
and internationally engaged), and an effort to eliminate boundaries
between disciplines. The first step in the revisioning process
will be the establishment of the Emerging Frontiers virtual division
proposed in the FY 2003 budget. It was recommended that measures
should be developed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Emerging
Frontiers virtual division.
Dr. Roskoski briefed the AC on its process for annual and long range program planning. The salient scientific ideas that emerged from the annual "Leading Edge" discussions between the BIO program officers and BIO senior management on the 2002 themes of Evolution, Multi-level integration, Data-"gazing/grazing", and Education were reviewed. At the BIO Science Retreat , these ideas were further distilled into two potential areas of emphasis: Living Networks and Microbial. The AC enthusiastically encouraged further development of these areas.
Important Notice Recommended
After discussing George Jones' Science
editorial of April 12, 2002, the AC recommended that the Director
of NSF issue an Important Notice to Presidents of Universities
and Colleges, stating a concern about the status of diversity within
the STEM enterprise in the US and challenging academic institutions
to vigorously employ creative means, such as requiring a diverse
pool of applicants to be considered before a new faculty hire could
be approved, in order to broaden the participation of underrepresented
groups at all levels. Security issues could be used to justify
a national effort to improve science education, similar to that
which occurred in the 1950's in response to the launch of Sputnik.
A diverse science workforce was seen as necessary to ensure that
the US continues to encourage and emphasize leading edge research.
Long-term Ecological Research (LTER) 20-Year Review Committee
Report: Dr. Leonard Krishtalka (and Dr. Frank Harris in absentia)
Dr. Krishtalka discussed the review process, summarized the accomplishments
of the LTER program, and presented the review committee's recommendations.
Recommendations included the following: (1) the third decade of
LTER should focus on synthesis science for ecological forecasting;
(2) the LTER community and NSF should jointly draft a 10-year strategic
plan based on 21st century biology, and (3) a goal of LTER should
be to understand the nation's ecosystems in order to use and preserve
them sustainably.
BIOAC FOLLOW-ON ACTIVITIES
Future Business:
It was agreed that education and coordination
with EHR should be high priorities. The BIO-AC will continue its
standing subcommittees on Education, the Environment, and 21st
Century Biology. Members were invited to suggest topics for workshops
on other activities for consideration by the AC.
Future Meeting Dates:
Fall - November 7-8, 2002
Spring 2003 - April 24-25, 2003
APPROVED
/S James Collins 11/8/02
__________________ ______________
James Collins, Chair Date
Back to Meeting Agendas and Minutes
Page