|
|
 |
|

Jerry Marsden's ambitious KDI project to advance
simulations of ocean and earth systems brought together mathematicians,
computer scientists, and geophysical scientists from four California
universities (Caltech, UC San Diego, UC Davis, and UC Santa Barbara). Marsden
and his group overcame distance, bureaucracy, and everyone's busy schedules to
achieve success, according to an NSF evaluation study of
the KDI program.
To collaborate on projects like this one, scientists have to
overcome obstacles of geographic distance, disciplinary training, institutional
structures, and sometimes even personality. James Watson and Francis Crick,
physicists-turned-biologists who discovered DNA structure in 1953, shared the
same office in Cambridge and talked for hours and days on end. But their
achievement depended on the independent work of Rosalind Franklin, a
crystallographer, at King's College in London. Franklin was skeptical, and it
was only through a friend's recommendation that Watson and Crick obtained the
critical photographs needed to make their advance.
One of the first steps Marsden and his collaborators took
when they were awarded a special KDI grant was to schedule annual workshops,
bring postdoctoral researchers onto the project, and institute a program for
postdoc and student exchanges. The researchers created Web sites to report on
meetings and share papers. They created tutorial lectures, and continued
communication and visits throughout the project. Postdocs helped supervise and
monitor the work of students. In a
workshop for KDI grantees, mathematician Steve Shkoller said these systematic
steps to foster communication across the disciplines helped the mathematicians
on this project identify the real needs of physical scientists, which then
allowed them to develop mathematical tools.
Other
successful projects identified by the evaluation also faced obstacles in their
collaborations. Daniel Joseph's project aimed to create 3-D simulations
fundamental to the chemical process for oil exploration and recovery used in
industry. The project linked engineers and computer scientists from Minnesota,
Texas, Pennsylvania, and Stanford. One strategy this collaboration adopted was
to ask the postdocs to learn techniques from the other discipline. For example,
computer science (CS) postdocs learned about computational fluid dynamics
(CFD), and CFD postdocs learned about CS. Another strategy the project adopted
was to hold seminars at one university every 6 months to evaluate progress.
This multi-disciplinary research led to a new discipline"direct numerical
simulations for multiphase dynamics."
Even projects within the same university can experience
obstacles to collaboration. Mark Embrecht's impressive project to explore the
discovery of new pharmaceuticals through database mining involved researchers
from the engineering, chemistry, and mathematics departments at Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute. Though weekly group meetings were convenient because all
principal investigators were based on the same campus, two who attended the KDI
workshop remarked on how long it took to get the collaboration going. They
estimated that it took almost a year before they were really able to make
progress. Because the grant was only for 3 years, as soon as results starting
coming in (e.g., their team won two data mining competitions), they had to
focus on securing additional funding.
Integrating knowledge from different disciplines and
learning to work together in a harmonious way are only two of the many
challenges that KDI researchers faced. A project at Arizona State University
under the direction of Anshuman Razdan had the goals of developing a software
library kernel, tools for data archiving, and an Internet-accessible interface
to let people construct customized search engines. Because the project involved
researchers from areas such as engineering, computer science, art, and
anthropology, there were no clear norms within the university for advising
graduate students across departments. The international journals or conferences
available for multi-disciplinary research were few, and other members of the
research community did not readily see the value of this research. Despite
these institutional barriers to collaboration, the project successfully
developed a software database that had immediate application to important
problems in the biosciences, in biotechnology, and in anthropology.
Back to Top of Page
|