text-only page produced automatically by LIFT Text Transcoder Skip all navigation and go to page contentSkip top navigation and go to directorate navigationSkip top navigation and go to page navigation
National Science Foundation Home National Science Foundation - Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences (SBE)
Social and Economic Sciences (SES)
design element
SES Home
About SES
Funding Opportunities
Awards
News
Events
Discoveries
Publications
Career Opportunities
Data Archiving Policy
Human Subjects Guidance
View SES Staff
SBE Organizations
Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences (BCS)
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES)
Social and Economic Sciences (SES)
SBE Office of Multidisciplinary Activities (SMA)
Proposals and Awards
Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide
  Introduction
Proposal Preparation and Submission
bullet Grant Proposal Guide
  bullet Grants.gov Application Guide
Award and Administration
bullet Award and Administration Guide
Award Conditions
Other Types of Proposals
Merit Review
NSF Outreach
Policy Office
Other Site Features
Special Reports
Research Overviews
Multimedia Gallery
Classroom Resources
NSF-Wide Investments

Email this pagePrint this page
All Images

Discovery
Mistaken Identity: How Feedback "After the Fact" Influences Eyewitnesses

Back to article | Note about images

Mug shots with question marks

Eyewitness testimony is a fundamental aspect of the American justice system. But "DNA acquittals" suggest that mistaken eyewitness identification is the primary cause of the conviction of innocent people.

Credit: Gary Wells, composite by John Prusinski

 

Gary L. Wells

Gary L. Wells, Distinguished Professor Psychology Department Iowa State University.

Credit: Gary Wells

 

Graph

Eyewitness Memory as a Function of Post-identification Feedback. The graph above shows the percentage of witnesses who recall being very certain, having a good view, being able to make out details of the culprit's face, ease of identification, and basis of identification. The control group (red bars) was given no feedback. The confirm group (blue bars) was given confirming feedback. The percentage of eyewitnesses who report having been very certain rises alarmingly to 50% if they received confirming feedback, compared to only 12% for the control condition.

Credit: Gary Wells

 

Watch the crime carefully then select the culprit from a lineup, if you can!

Credit: Gary Wells

 



Email this pagePrint this page
Back to Top of page