text-only page produced automatically by LIFT Text Transcoder Skip all navigation and go to page contentSkip top navigation and go to directorate navigationSkip top navigation and go to page navigation
National Science Foundation
 
At Low Ebb
 
Stumbling Across a Dinosaur
Skulls and Bones
Putting the Pieces Together
New Looks At Old Bones
Some Answers, More Questions
The Ultimate Question
Classroom Resources
 
 
 
A group of Scott tents pitched in the shadow of the Transantarctic Mountains. Click for larger image.

The team led by William Hammer believes this pelvis, exposed on the rock where it was preserved, belongs to a previously unknown plant-eating dinosaur. According to Hammer, "We have so few dinosaur specimens from the whole continent compared to any other place, that almost anything we find down there is new to science."

Credit: William Hammer


Some Answers, More Questions
The Ultimate Question
NSF has supported many efforts to collect evidence that shines light on the most hotly debated question about the monster creatures.
>> more
The Ultimate Question
Judd Case,
Saint Mary's College of California

Credit: Dena Headlee, National Science Foundation
The answer lay not, as one might expect, in 21st century scientific tools such as DNA analysis, because, Case noted, "the genetic material that one would use for such a comparison is all gone," turned to stone like the bones themselves.

Instead, a more venerable method was used to decide they had found something never before seen by science—searching the literature in specialized repositories, such as, in this case, the one at University of California, Berkeley, and comparing the physical evidence they had with characteristics of specimens that had already been described. They made comparisons between their partial skeleton and those of animals from the three known major groups of meat-eating dinosaurs.

"You get more and more specific about 'where does this best fit?' but you've got to start with the major categories first," Case said. "The vast majority of the bones we're finding are from the lower legs, the ankles and the feet. So then you can say, 'If you have this suite of bones, you belong in this group.' We could begin to eliminate groups that way."

"The group it seems to fit in best is one held together by their general primitive theropod characteristics," he added.

Eventually, Case, Martin and their team were certain they had found a new creature previously unknown to science.

But as is often the case in scientific research, new-found answers brought new questions. Questions that likely will have to wait for another day, and perhaps a different expedition, to answer.

"One of the surprising things is that animals with these more primitive characteristics generally haven't survived as long elsewhere as they have in Antarctica," Case said. "For whatever reason, they are still hanging out on the Antarctic continent. Why is this group still here when in other places other groups have displaced them? We don't know."

By Peter West
Digging Dinosaurs A Special Report
  Web Policies and Important Links | Privacy | FOIA | Help | Contact NSF | Contact Webmaster | SiteMap  
National Science Foundation The National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230, USA
Tel: (703) 292-5111 , FIRS: (800) 877-8339 | TDD: (800) 281-8749
Last Updated:
Jul 12, 2008
Text Only


Last Updated: Jul 12, 2008