Aberersold, Reudi, Leroy Hood, and Julian Watts. 2000. “Equipping
Scientists for the New Biology.” Nature Biology 18 (April
Association of American Universities. 1980. The Scientific Instrumentation Needs of Research Universities.
A Report to the National Science Foundation, Washington D.C., 1980.
Bordogna, Joseph. 2000. “Visions for
Engineering Education.” Address to the IEEE Interdisciplinary
Conference Electrical and Computer Engineering Education in the
Third Millennium, September 11, 2000.
Broderick, Andrew. 2001. “The Emergence of a Genomics Infrastructure.”
SRI Business Intelligence Program Bulletin. D01-2341.
Bush, Vannevar. 1945. Science – The Endless Frontier. A Report
to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research.
NSF 90-8. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Davey, Ken. 1996. “The Infrastructure of Academic Research.”
Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada Research File
European Commission. 2000. Annual
Summary Report on the Coordination of Activities in Support of Research
European Commission Conference on Research Infrastructures. 2000.
Commissioned Panel Reports. Strasbourg, Germany. September 19-20,
Feller, Irwin. 2002. “The NSF Budget: How Should We Determine
Future Levels?” Testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives,
House Committee on Science, Subcommittee on Research. March 13,
2002. Washington, DC.
Georghiou, Luke, et al. 2001. “Benchmarking the Provision of
Scientific Equipment.” Science and Public Policy. August
Goldin, Dan. 2001. Aerospace Daily. October 17, 2001.
Goldman, Charles A., and T. Williams. 2000. Paying for University
Research Facilities and Administration. MR-1135-1-OSTP. Washington,
Infrastructure Project: http://ksgwww.harvard.edu/iip.
JM Consulting LTD. 2001. Study of Science Research Infrastructure, A Report to
the UK Office of Science and Technology.
Kondro, Wayne. 1999. “Making Social Science Data More Useful.”
Science 286 (October 29).
Laboratories of the 21st Century:
Langford, Cooper H. 2000. “Evaluation of Rules for Access to Megascience
Research Environments Viewed From Canadian Experience.” Elsevier
(University of Calgary). Research Policy 29: 169-179.
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. 2002. NSF Report on Efficiency
of Grant Size and Duration.
Morris, Jefferson. 2001. “NASA Considering Closing, Consolidating
Centers As Part of Restructuring Effort.” Aerospace Daily, October
Mowery, David C. and Rosenberg, Nathan. 1993. “US National Innovation
System” in National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis
ed. Richard R. Nelson. Oxford University Press.
Narum, Jeanne L. 1996. “A Better Home for Undergraduate Science.” Issues
in Science and Technology. Fall 1996.
National Academy of Science. 1999. Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing
Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Institutes of Health, NIH Working Group on Construction
of Research Facilities. 2001. A Report to the Advisory Committee
of the Director. (http://www.nih.gov/about/director/061901.htm)
National Research Council,
Commission of Life Sciences. 1999. Finding the
Path: Issues of Access to Research Resources. National Academy
Press, Washington, D.C. (http://books.nap.edu/catalog/0309066255.html/).
on Behavioral and Social Sciences Commission. 1998. Investing
in Research Infrastructure in the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (http://bob.nap.edu/html/infrastructure).
-----, Committee on Infrastructure
Innovation. 1987. Infrastructure for the 21st
Century: Framework for a Research Agenda. National Academy
Press, Washington, D.C. (http://books.nap.edu/catalog/798.html/
-----, Committee on the
Organization and Management of Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics.
2001. US Astronomy and Astrophysics: Managing an
Integrated Program. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
-----, National Information
Infrastructure Steering Committee. 1998. The Unpredictable
Certainty: White Papers. National Academy Press, Washington,
-----, Space Studies Board. 1998. Interim
Assessment of Research and Data Analysis in NASA’s Office of Space
Science, Appendix D: NASA/OSS Response. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. http://www.nationalacademies.org/ssb/rda2000appendd.htm
Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee, Board on Physics and
Astronomy, Space Studies Board, National Research Council. 2001.
Astronomy and Astrophysics in the New Millennium. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9839.html).
National Science and Technology Council. 1995. Final Report
on Academic Research Infrastructure: A Federal Plan for Renewal.
-----, Biotechnology Research
Subcommittee. 1995. Biotechnology for the 21st
Century: New Horizons., Chapter 6. National Agricultural Library,
Washington, D.C. (http://www.nal.usda.gov/bic/bio21/infrastr.html/).
National Science Board. 2000. Environmental Science and Engineering for the 21st
Century: The Role of the National Science Foundation.
NSB-00-22. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
----. 2001a. Federal Research Resources: A Process for Setting Priorities. NSB-01-156. Arlington, VA: National Science
-----. 2001b. Toward a More Effective Role for the U.S. Government
in International Science and Engineering. NSB-01-187. Arlington,
VA: National Science Foundation.
-----. 2002a. Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. NSB-02-01. Arlington,
VA: National Science Foundation.
-----. 2002b. Statement on Guidelines for Setting Priority for Major Research Facilities.
November 2002, NSB 02-191.
-----. 2002c. The Scientific Allocation of Scientific Resources. NSB-01-39. An interim report issued for public
National Science Foundation. 2000a. EU Conference on Research Infrastructures. NSF Europe Office Update, Strasbourg, September
18-20, 2000. 00-03.
-----. 2000b. National Science Foundation, Celebrating
50 Years: Resource Guide 2000. NSF
00-87. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
-----. 2002. Facilities Funded Through the Major Research Equipment and Facilities
A report to the U.S. Congress, February 2002. Unpublished.
-----. 2003. Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyberinfrastructure.
Report of the Blue Ribbon NSF Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure,
February 2003. (http://www.communitytechnology.org/nsf_ci_report/)
-----. 2001. Academic Science and Engineering R&D Expenditures:
Fiscal Year 1999, Detailed Statistical Tables. NSF 01-329.
Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
-----, Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education.
2003. Complex Environmental Systems: Synthesis for Earth, Like,
and Society in the 21st Century.
-----, Advisory Committee for the Directorate for Mathematical
and Physical Sciences. 2000. Reinvestment Initiative in Science
and Engineering (RISE). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
-----, Division of Policy Research and Analysis. 1987. Infrastructure: The Capital Requirements for Academic
Research. PRA Report 87-3.
-----, Division of Science Resources Statistics. 2000. Science
and Engineering Research Facilities at Colleges and Universities,
1998. NSF-01-301. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
-----, Division of Science Resources Statistics. 2002. Scientific
and Engineering Research Facilities, 2001, Detailed Statistical
Tables. NSF 02-307. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
-----, Division of Science Resources Studies. 1994. Academic
Research Instruments: Expenditures 1993, Needs 1994. NSF-96-324.
Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
-----, Division of Science Resources Studies. 1997. SRS Data
Brief: Total Stock of Academic Research Instruments Tops $6 Billion
in 1993. 1997(6): June 6, 1997. Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation Act of 1950. Public Law 81-507.
Nature. 2000. “Europe Urged to Set Up Advisory Body on Research
Infrastructure.” Nature 407 : 433-434.
Nobel e-Museum: http://www.nobel.se.
OMB Circular No. A-11, Part 3:
Planning, Budgeting and Acquisition of Capital Assets. (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a11/99toc.html).
Pitts, Nathaniel. 1995. Final Report on Academic Research Infrastructure: A Federal
Plan for Renewal. Washington, DC: National Science and
Technology Council. National Academy press. Washington, D.C.
President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee. February
1999. Information Technology Research: Investing in Our Future.
National Coordination Office for Information Technology
Research and Development. (http://www.ccic.gov/ac/report/)
Rich, R.H. 1999. The Role of the National Science Foundation
in Supporting Advanced Network Infrastructure: Views of the Research
Community. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement
Rippen, Helga. 2001. “A Framework for the Information Technology
Infrastructure for Bio-terrorism (Draft).” December 7, 2001. Washington,
DC: RAND Science and Technology Policy Institute.
Schmidt, P. 1998. “A Building Boom for Public Colleges.” Chronicle
of Higher Education. June 12, 1998: A29-A30.
Scientific American Explore!:
Databases. “Drowning in
Data.” October 4, 1999.http://www.sciam.com/explorations/1999/100499data.
Solow, Robert. 2002. “Let’s Quantify the Humanities.” The
Chronicle of Higher Education, April 19, 2002: B20.
The National Human Genome Research
The Space and Aeronomy Collaboratory
UCLA Information Technology Retreat. 1999. Information
Technology and Research Overview. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
UK Office of Science and Technology. 2001. Large Facilities
Strategic Road Map. http://www.ost.gov.uk/research/funding/lfroadmap/index.htm
U.S. Commission on National Security. 2001. Road Map for National
Security: Addendum on Structure and Process Analyses (Hart-Rudman
report). Washington, DC.
U. S. Department of Energy, Office
of Scientific and Technical Information. 2000. Workshop
on a Future Information Infrastructure for the Physical Sciences. May 30-31, 2000. http://www.osti.gov/physicalsciences/
U.S. Department of Energy. 2001. Infrastructure Frontier:
A Quick Look Survey of the Office of Science Laboratory Infrastructure.
This report can be read on-line at http://www.er.doe.gov/production/er-80/er-82/labs21/.
U.S. General Accounting Office. 1998. Best Practices: Elements Critical to Successfully Reducing
Unneeded RDT&E Infrastructure. GAO/NSIAD/RCED-98-23. Washington, DC