Proposal Review Form

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
OMB NO. 3145-0060
NSF FORM 1 (10/97)

PROPOSAL REVIEW FORM

PROPOSAL NO.

INSTITUTION

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

NSF PROGRAM

TITLE

Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?
Criterion 2: What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?

Please attach a separate sheet(s) with your evaluation of this proposal with respect to each of the above criteria per instructions on the previous page. Your specific comments on the proposal's strengths and weaknesses are critical. Do not share, copy, quote, or otherwise use or disclose material from this proposal. Destroy it after you complete your review.

Summary Statement (Include comments on the relative importance of the two criteria in assigning your rating. Continue on additional page, if necessary):

Overall Rating (check one) :

Excellent:

[ ] Very Good: High quality proposal in nearly all respects; should be supported if at all possible.

[ ] Good: A quality proposal, worthy of support.

[ ] Fair: Proposal lacking in one or more critical aspects; key issues need to be addressed.

[ ] Poor: Proposal has serious deficiencies.

YOUR IDENTITY WILL BE KEPT CONFIDENTIAL

NSF keeps reviews and your identity as a reviewer of specific proposals confidential to the maximum extent possible. We will, however, send the principal investigator(s) a copy of this review without your name and affiliation.

REVIEWER'S REVIEWER'S NAME AND ADDRESS (TYPED):

SIGNATURE:

OTHER SUGGESTED REVIEWERS (OPTIONAL)

PLEASE RETURN BY:

FILE IN PROPOSAL FILE

Attachment A
06/25/97

REVIEWER'S	REVIEWER'S NAME AND ADDRESS (TYPED):
SIGNATURE:
OTHER SUGGESTED REVIEWERS (OPTIONAL)


	*PLEASE RETURN BY:*