This document has been archived.
Introduction Features of
Collaborative Research Groups Eligibility
Instructions for Proposal and
Full Proposal Submission Preproposal and
Proposal Due Dates FastLane Submission
Grant Award and Administration Information
General Information National Science Foundation Directorate for Biological Sciences Collaborative Research at Undergraduate Institutions
National Science Foundation
Directorate for Biological Sciences
Collaborative Research at Undergraduate Institutions
Preproposal Deadline: January 15, 1999
Full-length Proposal Deadline: April 2, 1999
The National Science Foundation (NSF) is charged with ensuring the vitality of the Nation's scientific and technological enterprise. Central to this mandate is a concern for the quality, distribution, and effectiveness of research and education in science and engineering. Integration of research and education is one of NSF's four core strategies designed to build a strong resource base for the Nation's programs in research and education. In order to help assure a broad base for research, NSF encourages research by faculty at predominantly undergraduate institutions. Such research contributes to basic knowledge in science and engineering, strengthens the quality of undergraduate education, provides a stronger foundation for graduate study and careers in science and engineering, and provides an opportunity for more effective integration of the excitement of scientific discovery into undergraduate education.
Increasingly, advances in research in the biological sciences depend on skills and knowledge that extend beyond traditional disciplinary boundaries. To encourage multidisciplinary research efforts at predominantly undergraduate institutions, the Collaborative Research at Undergraduate Institutions (C-RUI) Program was an initiative begun in 1995, targeted specifically toward developing collaborative research projects. This activity is a modification of the existing NSF-wide Research in Undergraduate Institutions (RUI) program (NSF 94-79). Research projects supported through C-RUI involve faculty members and undergraduate students of predominantly undergraduate institutions. They may either be carried out entirely within the predominantly undergraduate institution(s), or may be collaborative projects with institutions other than predominantly undergraduate institutions. The program will:
FEATURES OF COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH GROUPS
The proposed collaborative research plan must focus on a research problem in biological sciences that is best approached from broad perspectives. A collaborative research group must consist of three or more faculty and up to ten undergraduates from the predominantly undergraduate institution(s).
Successful proposals will be those having a strong research plan integrated with a strong educational component, where development of multidisciplinary collaboration will enhance the research project, and where the project will contribute significantly to the education and training of undergraduates and to the institution(s) involved.
Proposals submitted to this competition are expected to have the following characteristics:
Proposals must originate from United States predominantly undergraduate institutions: institutions exceeding graduate enrollment, and that have awarded no more than 20 Ph.D. or D.Sci. degrees in NSF-supported fields in the two years preceding proposal submission. For a fuller description of predominantly undergraduate institutions, see the current NSF Guide to Programs located on the NSF web site at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf994. Proposals involving more than one academic institution are acceptable, but one predominantly undergraduate institution must have overall management responsibility. Collaborations between predominantly undergraduate institutions and other institutions may be proposed; however, all but one faculty member of the collaborative research group must come from predominantly undergraduate institutions. The student members of the research group must all come from the predominantly undergraduate institution(s). Details of multi-institutional collaborations must be discussed with the C-RUI Program Coordinator before submission.
The Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) does not support biological sciences research with disease-related goals, including studies on toxicology, epidemiology, or the etiology, diagnosis, or treatment of physical or mental disease, abnormality, or malfunction in human beings or animals. Studies of animal models for such conditions and the design or testing of drugs or procedures for their treatment are also not eligible for support.
The Principal Investigator must be the director of the collaborative research project and must be a faculty member of the submitting predominantly undergraduate institution. The director will have overall responsibility for the administration of the award and for discussions with NSF. The Principal Investigator and the submitting institution must include in the proposal an administrative plan explaining how year-round interactions will be encouraged between student members and faculty participants.
Awards will be made for a period of three or four years. The proposal must contain an explicit justification for the proposed research and award duration. Annual budgets for collaborative research projects are expected to average $200,000. In addition to the operating budget, a total of up to $50,000 may be requested for the acquisition of well-justified research equipment at the predominantly undergraduate institution for the enhancement of the collaborative research project. The BIO Directorate expects to make up to 10 awards in FY 1999 pending the availability of funds, and to repeat the competition on a biennial cycle pending the availability of funds. C-RUI expects to recommend awards in August 1999.
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION PROCESS
A two-stage proposal-submission process will be used for C-RUI. Applicants for a C-RUI award must first submit an abbreviated proposal (preproposal), A panel of experts will review the preproposals and will recommend approximately twenty of them for development into full proposals. Submission of a preproposal is required before a full-length proposal will be accepted.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPROPOSAL AND FULL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
Proposals (preproposals and full proposals) submitted in response to this program announcement must be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the Grant Proposal Guide (GPG), NSF 99-2. The complete text of the GPG (including electronic forms) is available electronically on the NSF Web site at: ( http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf992) . Paper copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (301) 947-2722 or by e-mail from email@example.com. Preproposals must be mailed to directly to the program. Full proposals must be submitted via the NSF FastLane System. Instructions and guidelines for the FastLane submission of proposals are detailed in "Instructions for Preparing and Submitting a Standard Proposal via FastLane" located at https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm. Also, see the "FASTLANE SUBMISSION" section below.
Proposers are reminded to identify the program announcement number (NSF 99-11) in the program announcement/solicitation block on the NSF Form 1207, "Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science Foundation." Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay processing.
Guidelines are provided for specific sections of the preproposal as follows:
Include a separate one page list of faculty participants, and affiliations at the end of the Project Description. This is not included in the 5 page Project Description limitation.
Prepare full-length proposals in accordance with the guidelines contained in the GPG (NSF 99-2) and these instructions. Use guidelines for group proposals (GPG, Chapter II, Section D.12.b).
Full proposals that do not conform to instructions will be returned without review. The Principal Investigator is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the proposal as submitted.
Guidelines are provided for specific sections of the full proposal as follows:
In the box for Program Announcement/Solicitation No. enter NSF 99-11.
Include this component, as a separate section labeled Education and Training, at the end of the Project Description file. This section may not exceed five pages and is not included in the 25 page limitation of the Project Description.
PREPROPOSAL AND PROPOSAL DUE DATES
Collaborative Research at Undergraduate Institutions
Program – NSF 99-11
Division of Biological Infrastructure
National Science Foundation
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 615
Arlington, VA 22230
Mail the following materials directly to Collaborative Research at Undergraduate Institutions (C-RUI) program:
The mailed materials must be received by April 9, 1999 for full proposals. Send materials to:
Collaborative Research at Undergraduate Institutions Program – NSF 99-11Division of Biological Infrastructure
Do not mail copies of the full proposal. NSF will make the appropriate number of copies of the proposal.
In order to use NSF FastLane to prepare and submit a proposal, you must have the following software: Netscape Navigator 3.0 or above, or Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.01 or above; Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or above for viewing PDF files; and Adobe Acrobat 3.X or Aladdin Ghostscript 5.10 or above for converting files to PDF.
To use FastLane to prepare the proposal your institution needs to be a registered FastLane institution. A list of registered institutions and the FastLane registration form are located on the FastLane Home Page. To register an organization, authorized organizational representatives must complete the registration form. Once an organization is registered, PIN for individual staff are available from the organization’s sponsored projects office.
To access FastLane, go to the NSF Web site at http://www.nsf.gov, then select "FastLane," or go directly to the FastLane home page at http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/. Please see "Instructions for Preparing and Submitting a Proposal to the NSF Directorate for Biological Sciences" located at http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/BioInstr.htm . Additionally, read the "PI Tipsheet for Proposal Preparation" and the "Frequently Asked Questions about FastLane Proposal Preparation," accessible at https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/A1Prep.htm .
IMPORTANT NOTE: For technical assistance with FastLane, please send an e-mail message to firstname.lastname@example.org. If you have inquiries regarding other aspects of proposal preparation or submission, please send an e-mail message to email@example.com before the deadline dates for submission.
Reviews of proposals submitted to NSF are solicited from peers with expertise in the substantive area of the proposed research or education project. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight of the review process. NSF invites the proposer to suggest at the time of submission, the names of appropriate or inappropriate reviewers. Special care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no immediate and obvious conflicts with the proposer. Special efforts are made to recruit reviewers from non-academic institutions, minority serving institutions, adjacent disciplines to that principally addressed in the proposal, first time NSF reviewers, etc.
Proposals will be reviewed against the following general merit review criteria established by the National Science Board. Following each criterion are potential considerations that the reviewer may employ in the evaluation. These are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. Each reviewer will be asked to address only those that are relevant to the proposal and for which he/she is qualified to make judgments.
How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field and across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources?
How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?
Integration of Research and Education
One of the principal strategies in support of NSF’s goals is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals may concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students and where all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the excitement of discovery and enrich research through the diversity of learner perspectives. PIs should address this issue in their proposal to provide reviewers with the information necessary to respond fully to both NSF merit review criteria. NSF staff will give it careful consideration in making funding decisions.
Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities
Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens -- women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities -- is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports. PIs should address this issue in their proposal to provide reviewers with the information necessary to respond fully to both NSF merit review criteria. NSF staff will give it careful consideration in making funding decisions.
Additional Merit Review Information
Preproposals will be reviewed by an external advisory panel. Following this review, approximately 20 applicants with promising projects will be invited to submit full-length proposals. Applicants should be aware that the comments of preproposal reviewers will be considered during the review of full-length proposals. It is expected that applicants will be notified by February 24 about the decisions on preproposals. Full proposals will be evaluated by ad hoc (mail) reviewers as well as by a multidisciplinary panel.
GRANT AWARD AND ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
Notification of the Award
Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Program Division administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal Investigator.
Grant Award Conditions
Grants awarded as a result of this announcement are administered in accordance with the terms and conditions of NSF GC-1, "Grant General Conditions," or FDP-III, "Federal Demonstration Project General Terms and Conditions," depending on the grantee organization. Copies of these documents are available at no cost from the NSF Clearinghouse, P.O. Box 218, Jessup, Maryland 20794-0218, telephone (301) 947-2722, or via e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. More comprehensive information is contained in the NSF Grant Policy Manual (NSF 95-26), available on the NSF OnLine Document System located at http://www.nsf.gov/, or for sale through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.
For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the PI must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period.
Within 90 days after expiration of a grant, the PI also is required to submit a final project report. Approximately 30 days before expiration, NSF will send a notice to remind the PI of the requirement to file the final project report. Failure to provide final technical reports delays NSF review and processing of pending proposals for the PI. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data.
NSF has implemented a new electronic project reporting system, available through FastLane, which permits electronic submission and updating of project reports, including information on: project participants (individual and organizational); activities and findings; publications; and, other specific products and contribution. Reports will continue to be required annually and after the expiration of the grant, but PIs will not need to re-enter information previously provided, either with the proposal or in earlier updates using the electronic system.
Effective October 1, 1998, PIs are required to use the new reporting format for annual and final project reports. PIs are strongly encouraged to submit reports electronically via FastLane. For those PIs who cannot access FastLane, paper copies of the new report formats may be obtained from the NSF Clearinghouse as specified above. NSF expects to require electronic submission of all annual and final project reports via FastLane beginning in October, 1999.
New Awardee Information
If the submitting organization has never received an NSF award, it is recommended that the organization’s appropriate administrative officials become familiar with the policies and procedures in the NSF Grant Policy Manual which are applicable to most NSF awards. The "Prospective New Awardee Guide" (NSF 97-100) includes information on: Administration and Management Information; Accounting System Requirements and Auditing Information; and Payments to Organizations with Awards. This information will assist an organization in preparing documents that NSF requires to conduct administrative and financial reviews of an organization. The guide also serves as a means of highlighting the accountability requirements associated with Federal awards. This document is available electronically on NSF’s Web site at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf97100.
General inquiries should be made to:C-RUI Program Coordinator for Biology
CERTIFICATION OF C-RUI ELIGIBILITY
[This certification, executed by an Authorized Institutional Representative, must appear in both the Preproposal and Full-Length Proposal. Print this page and mail as instructed in the "Proposal Due Dates" section above.]
By submission of this proposal, the institution hereby certifies that the originating and managing institution is an institution that offers courses leading to a bachelor's or master's degree, but has awarded no more that 20 doctoral degrees in NSF-supported disciplines in the two years preceding proposal submission.
Signature of Authorized Institutional Representative
Typed Name and Title:
The National Science Foundation (NSF) funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. Grantees are wholly responsible for conducting their project activities and preparing the results for publication. Thus, the Foundation does not assume responsibility for such findings or their interpretation.
NSF welcomes proposals from all qualified scientists, engineers, and educators. The Foundation strongly encourages women, minorities, and persons with disabilities to compete fully in its programs. In accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and NSF policies, no person on grounds of race, color, age, sex, national origin, or disability shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving financial assistance from NSF. Some programs may have special requirements that limit eligibility.
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (NSF 91-54) provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities (investigators and other staff, including student research assistants) to work on NSF-supported projects.
The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation regarding NSF programs, employment, or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 306-0090; FIRS at 1-800-877-8339.
PRIVACY ACT AND PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENTS
The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the review process; to applicant institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal-review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers, and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies needing information as part of the review process or in order to coordinate programs; and to another Federal agency, court or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding this burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Reports Clearance Officer; Information Dissemination Branch, DAS; National Science Foundation; Arlington, VA 22230.
The program described in this announcement is in the category 47.074 (BIO) of the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance.
YEAR 2000 REMINDER
In accordance with Important Notice No. 120 dated June 27, 1997, Subject: Year 2000 Computer Problem, NSF awardees are reminded of their responsibility to take appropriate actions to ensure that the NSF activity being supported is not adversely affected by the Year 2000 problem. Potentially affected items include computer systems, databases, and equipment. The National Science Foundation should be notified if an awardee concludes that the Year 2000 will have a significant impact on its ability to carry out an NSF-funded activity. Information concerning Year 2000 activities can be found on the NSF Web site at http://www.nsf.gov/oirm/y2k/start.htm.