Proposal Deadline:
Years 2000 through 2002 -- 2 Monday in January
The Divisions of Environmental Biology, Integrative Biology and Neuroscience, and Biological Infrastructure announce a special competition to stimulate and facilitate this type of integrated research in environmental biology. For the purposes of this competition, environmental biology is broadly defined to include research fields of systematic biology, population biology, ecology, ecosystem studies, ecological and evolutionary physiology, and animal behavior. Information on these core programs may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/bio. This competition is designed to meet a growing need for larger, explicitly integrated research projects that address major issues within or across these fields of ecology and evolution. The competition especially seeks to enable the kinds of synergisms and intellectual leveraging that result from integrated and synoptic approaches to key questions from differing perspectives and scales.
This competition supports the contemporary interpretation of NSF’s statutory mission, described in the report NSF in a Changing World: The NSF Strategic Plan (NSF 95-24) located at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf9524), which emphasizes the stewardship role of the Foundation in promoting the discovery, integration, dissemination, and employment of new knowledge in service to society. Extraordinary creativity, originality, and potential impact on both science and society are strongly encouraged. The core questions addressed in the competition must be clearly identifiable as environmental biology as described above. The research may also require input from other natural science, social science, mathematical or engineering fields.
Plans for integration should thus be emphasized in the proposals. The integration is rooted in the simultaneous and/or compatible collection of diverse kinds of data; it may be achieved by direct comparison of data sets collected at different scales of time, space, or complexity; by examination of a single phenomenon across multiple levels of organization; by simulation modeling and extrapolation with appropriate tests of predictions; or by other means described by the investigators in their proposals. It is also required that proposals will include plans for meaningful integration of research with education, outreach, or broad dissemination of research results.
The inclusion of an overall conceptual model linking each part of the work to the overall goals is essential. Proposals may involve experimentation and/or simulation modeling, but neither is a requirement. All aspects of each project must be scientifically sound, but some of the parts may not be particularly new or innovative in themselves: the value of these is in the context of the overall project and its conceptual model.
It is expected that achievement of the research goals will require multiple investigators with diverse and complementary skills. Proposals must include a management plan that describes how coordination among investigators will be achieved and how priorities are set.
Examples of how knowledge is advanced by the integrated approach include:
Letter of Intent: The PI should send a short electronic message of intent to submit a proposal to ircebrev@nsf.gov on or before November 30. The purpose of the message of intent is to help NSF plan for the review process by giving the Foundation an estimate of the number and topical scope of proposals expected. The message should be no more than 500 words long (approximately one page of single-spaced text), and should touch on the following topics: 1) the question(s) to be addressed; 2) the integrated nature of the research as described in this announcement; 3) key elements of the research approach (methods, sites, organisms); and 4) the identity of the investigators, institutions and facilities. Acknowledgments will be sent by email on or about 1 December 1998. Please note that messages of intent are for information purposes only. Proposal review and funding recommendations will be based on the full proposals.
Full Proposals: Proposals to Integrated Research Challenges in Environmental Biology (IRC-EB) require electronic submission via the NSF FastLane system in accordance with the guidelines provided in the "Instructions for Proposal Preparation" found in the GPG, Chapter II. The GPG is available on the NSF Web Site at the URL http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf992. Include in proposals to IRC-EB the components listed in GPG, Chapter II, Section D. State information in each component as clearly and concisely as possible for merit review. Take special care in adhering to the requirements for page limitations, font size, and margins (see GPG, Chapter II, Section C). Proposals not strictly adhering to the requirements of the GPG and these guidelines are returned without review. Instructions and guidelines for the FastLane submission of proposals are detailed in Instructions for Preparing and Submitting a Standard Proposal via FastLane located at https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm. Also, see the "Proposal Submission" section below. The following exceptions and additions apply to proposals submitted to IRC-EB:Multi-institutional proposals must identify a lead institution and must be submitted as a single proposal. Be sure to check the group proposal box on the cover page (see GPG, Chapter II, Section D.12(b). Only the lead institution should submit the proposal cover sheet (NSF Form 1207) via FastLane.
The mailed material must be received no later than five (business) days after the proposal submission deadline. Send materials to:
1. What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?
How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field and across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources?
2. What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?
How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?
Integration of Research and EducationOne of the principal strategies in support of NSF’s goals is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals may concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students and where all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the excitement of discovery and enrich research through the diversity of learner perspectives. PIs should address this issue in their proposal to provide reviewers with the information necessary to respond fully to both NSF merit review criteria. NSF staff will give it careful consideration in making funding decisions.
Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens -- women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities -- is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports. PIs should address this issue in their proposal to provide reviewers with the information necessary to respond fully to both NSF merit review criteria. NSF staff will give it careful consideration in making funding decisions. Additional Review CriteriaIn addition to the criteria stated above, reviewers will be asked to judge each proposal on the following criteria:
1) adherence to the integrated nature of the research as described in this announcement;
GRANT AWARD AND ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the PI must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period.
Within 90 days after expiration of a grant, the PI also is required to submit a final project report. Approximately 30 days before expiration, NSF will send a notice to remind the PI of the requirement to file the final project report. Failure to provide final technical reports delays NSF review and processing of pending proposals for the PI. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data. NSF has implemented a new electronic project reporting system, available through FastLane, which permits electronic submission and updating of project reports, including information on: project participants (individual and organizational); activities and findings; publications; and other specific products and contributions. Reports will continue to be required annually and after the expiration of the grant, but PIs will not need to re-enter information previously provided, either with the proposal or in earlier updates using the electronic system. Effective October 1, 1998, PIs are required to use the new reporting format for annual and final project reports. PIs are strongly encouraged to submit reports electronically via FastLane. For those PIs who cannot access FastLane, paper copies of the new report formats may be obtained from the NSF Clearinghouse as specified above. NSF expects to require electronic submission of all annual and final project reports via FastLane beginning in October, 1999. D. New Awardee InformationIf the submitting organization has never received an NSF award, it is recommended that the organization’s appropriate administrative officials become familiar with the policies and procedures in the NSF Grant Policy Manual which are applicable to most NSF awards. The "Prospective New Awardee Guide" (NSF 97-100) includes information on: Administration and Management Information; Accounting System Requirements and Auditing Information; and Payments to Organizations with Awards. This information will assist an organization in preparing documents that NSF requires to conduct administrative and financial reviews of an organization. The guide also serves as a means of highlighting the accountability requirements associated with Federal awards. This document is available electronically on NSF’s Web site at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf97100.
OTHER INFORMATION
NSF publications, including guidelines, eligibility, and deadlines are available on the NSF Documents OnLine System at http://www.nsf.gov. Copies of publications are also available at no cost from the NSF Clearinghouse, P.O. Box 218, Jessup, Maryland 20794-0218, telephone (301) 947-2722, or via e-mail to pubs@nsf.gov. Information about programs relevant to the Directorate for Biological Sciences is available at <"http://www.nsf.gov/bio<">.The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the review process; to applicant institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal-review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers, and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies needing information as part of the review process or in order to coordinate programs; and to another Federal agency, court or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding this burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Reports Clearance Officer; Information Dissemination Branch, DAS; National Science Foundation; Arlington, VA 22230. The program described in this announcement is in the category 47.074 (BIO) of the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. YEAR 2000 REMINDERIn accordance with Important Notice No. 120 dated June 27, 1997, Subject: Year 2000 Computer Problem, NSF awardees are reminded of their responsibility to take appropriate actions to ensure that the NSF activity being supported is not adversely affected by the Year 2000 problem. Potentially affected items include computer systems, databases, and equipment. The National Science Foundation should be notified if an awardee concludes that the Year 2000 will have a significant impact on its ability to carry out an NSF-funded activity. Information concerning Year 2000 activities can be found on the NSF Web site at http://www.nsf.gov/oirm/y2k/start.htm.
OMB# 3145-0058