Program Announcement
NSF 99-75
Directorate
for Education and Human Resources
DEADLINE:
MAY 5, 1999
|
CONTENTS: |
General Information
Program Name: NSF Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 Education (GK-12)
Short Description/Synopsis of Program:
This program supports fellowships and associated training that will enable graduate students and advanced undergraduates in the sciences, mathematics, engineering, and technology to serve in K–12 schools as resources knowledgeable about both the content and applications of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Academic institutions apply for awards to support fellowship activities, and are responsible for selecting fellows. The fellows will serve as resources for teachers in science and mathematics instruction. Expected outcomes include improved communication and teaching skills for the fellows, enriched learning by K–12 students, professional development opportunities for K–12 teachers, and strengthened partnerships between institutions of higher education and local school districts.
Cognizant Program Officer: Dr. Dorothy L. Stout, Division of Undergraduate Education, Room 835, telephone (703) 306-1670, e-mail <dstout@nsf.gov>
Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Nos.: 47.041, 47.049, 47.050, 47.070, 47.074, 47.075, 47.076, and 47.078
Eligibility
The National Science Foundation (NSF) recognizes that
graduates of higher education programs in science, mathematics, engineering,
and technology (SMET) can contribute to the national effort to address
the challenging issues in K-12 education across a broad spectrum of schools
and educational levels. In particular, with sufficient training, SMET graduate
students can serve K-12 teachers and schools as valuable resources for
SMET content and applications. Although the focus of this initiative is
on graduate students serving as resources for K-12 education, it is important
to note the benefits of undergraduate students having similar opportunities.
Consequently, advanced undergraduate SMET majors may be included as appropriate
to further the goals of individual projects. NSF anticipates that, in the
future, these fellows will continue to contribute toward the improvement
of the nation’s educational enterprise. Education will benefit from the
contributions of professionals who will have classroom experience and an
understanding of topics in SMET education such as how scientific knowledge
and the process of inquiry can be communicated to diverse novice learners
in a variety of settings, how teaching and learning can be assessed, how
new disciplinary knowledge can be incorporated in curriculum development,
and how technology can be used to advance the teaching of SMET. The higher
education community will benefit from the improved preparation of pre-college
students in SMET.
To support these opportunities, the Foundation has initiated
the program NSF Graduate Teaching Fellows in K–12 Education (GK-12).
In this pilot year of the program (FY1999), approximately $7.5 million
is expected to be available to support up to 20 GK-12 awards. Awards are
expected to be in the range of $200,000 to $500,000 per year for two to
three years.
GK-12 is an NSF-wide program including the Directorates
for Biological Sciences (BIO), Computer and Information Science and Engineering
(CISE), Education and Human Resources (EHR), Engineering (ENG), Geosciences
(GEO), Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS), and Social, Behavioral,
and Economic Sciences (SBE); and the Office of Polar Programs (OPP).
The primary objective of the program is to provide fellowships
to highly qualified SMET graduate students in support of their chosen studies
and opportunities to directly serve as SMET resources in K-12 science and
mathematics education. Projects may also include advanced undergraduate
SMET majors when such participation would clearly strengthen the proposed
effort.
GK-12 fellows, selected by awardee institutions, will
work directly with teachers to, for example:
Projects may draw participants from two or more departments
within one institution or from more than one institution.
All projects are expected to incorporate the following
features:
The Principal Investigator (PI) will have overall responsibility
for the administration of the award, the management of the project, and
interactions with the NSF. The PI and the home institution are expected
to develop an administrative structure that enables faculty, K-12 teachers,
school administrators, fellows, and others involved in the group effort
to interact productively during the award period. The PI is expected to
be an integral participant in the education and training activities of
the GK-12 project.
PIs are expected to attend a meeting convened by NSF to
exchange ideas, to establish and strengthen communication networks, to
learn about the activities of GK-12 fellows, and to discuss ways of measuring
progress. This group will also discuss the effectiveness of GK-12 activities
in preparing the fellows for leadership careers and enhancing K-12 instruction.
For fellows selected in projects funded in this round
of GK-12 awards, the stipend will be $18,000 per year per graduate student.
In addition to the stipend, the grantee institution will be allowed a cost-of-education
allowance of $10,500 per year per graduate student. In consideration of
the cost-of-education allowance, graduate student fellows will be exempt
from paying tuition and fees normally charged to students of similar academic
standing, unless such charges are optional or are refundable. The stipend
for an undergraduate student will be $5,000 per academic year and $5,000
per summer. All fellows will spend a minimum of ten hours per week providing
direct assistance to K-12 teachers and five hours of preparation outside
of the classroom.
Expected outcomes include (1) improved communication and
teaching-related skills for fellows, (2) enriched learning by K-12 students,
(3) professional development opportunities for K-12 teachers, and (4) strengthened
partnerships between higher education institutions and local school districts.
The K-12 school(s) must be involved in the development of
the project plan. Although training activities on the campus of an institution
of higher education may be part of the project plan, it is expected that
the preponderance of participant activities with K-12 teachers and students
will occur in K-12 schools. Proposers are encouraged to establish collaborative
arrangements with other institutions (e.g., industry, non-profit institutions,
museums) to support their activities.
A. Institutions
Academic institutions in the United States and its territories
that grant master’s or doctoral degrees in SMET disciplines are invited
to submit proposals. Projects involving more than one U.S. institution
are eligible, but a single institution must accept overall management responsibility.
Collaborating institutions need not be academic and may include industry,
non-profit institutions, museums, etc. Details of complex, multi-institutional
arrangements should be discussed with one of the directorate representatives
listed at the end of this announcement before proposal submission. NSF
does not anticipate making more than one GK-12 award to a single institution
as a result of any single competition. However, an institution may submit
up to two single-institution proposals, and as lead institution, one multi-institution
proposal, per round of competition. Projects involving majors from any
of the SMET fields normally supported by NSF are eligible.
B. Principal Investigator
The PI must be an institutional leader within the discipline-based
SMET faculty.
C. Fellows
GK-12 fellows will be selected by awardee institutions,
but must be:
The number and size of awards will vary depending upon the scope of projects and availability of funds; however, it is anticipated that about 20 institutional awards in the range of $200,000 to $500,000 per year for a period of two to three years will be made as a result of this competition.
PROPOSAL PREPARATION & SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
A. Letter of Intent
A letter of intent to submit a proposal is requested (but
not required) from all applicants, to assist NSF in plans for review. The
letter of intent is not a preliminary proposal. It is a brief statement
and should be received no later than April 1, 1999. Letters of intent must
be sent by electronic mail to <gk-12@nsf.gov>.
B. Proposal Preparation Instructions
Proposals submitted in response to this program announcement
should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines
contained in the Grant Proposal Guide (GPG), NSF 99-2. The complete
text of the GPG (including electronic forms) is available electronically
on the NSF Web site <http://www.nsf.gov/>.
Paper copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse,
telephone (301) 947-2722, or by e-mail from <pubs@nsf.gov>.
Proposers are reminded to identify the program announcement
number (NSF 99-75) in the program announcement/solicitation block on the
NSF Form 1207 ("Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science Foundation").
Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant
proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may
delay processing.
FastLane must be used to prepare and submit GK-12 proposals.
Proposals must contain the following elements in the order
indicated. Proposals that do not strictly adhere to the specified page
limitations (given below) will be ineligible for consideration and will
be returned without review.
The project plan is expected to:
Describe plans and procedures for the recruitment,
selection, and retention of GK-12 fellows, including specific provisions
for success with members of groups underrepresented in SMET.
Also provide reasonable estimates of the number of students
eligible and likely to be interested in participating, and explain the
basis for these estimates.
This section is expected to:
This section is expected to:
Recognizing the importance of infrastructure support and
the significant involvement of faculty and K-12 teachers, up to 30% of
the budget may be designated for direct costs other than student stipends
and cost-of-education allowances. These funds are intended to supplement
institutional and school district resources in support of GK-12 activities.
Funds may be requested for personnel for the development
and construction of special instruments, as may funds for the purchase
of computer software or other special-purpose materials. The total requested
for software and special-purpose materials may not exceed $10,000.
Funds should be included for the PI and up to three participants
to attend a meeting convened by NSF. The participants should include at
least one school district representative and one GK-12 fellow.
Indirect costs are limited to 8% of total direct costs,
excluding stipends, cost-of-education allowances, and equipment.
Budget Justification: A brief justification for
funds in each budget category should be provided. This section should also
include details of institutional cost sharing, if any, and of other sources
of support for the GK-12 project, such as government, industry, or private
foundations. (Although cost sharing is not required and will not be a review
criterion, any such commitment specified in the proposal will be referenced
and included as a condition of an award resulting from this announcement.)
As part of this section, provide a list of all relevant documentation,
including that for commitments by participating institutions and organizations
and commitments by any other sources of funding. Letters or other documentation
on the list of commitments should be included either (1) at the end of
the Budget Justification PDF file or (2) at the end of the Project Description
PDF file. (Such letters will not count against the three-page limit for
budget justification specified in the GPG or the 25-page limit for the
Project Description specified in this program announcement.) While there
is no limit on the number of letters that may be listed, no more
than six letters of commitment may be included as part of the proposal
itself. Do not include additional letters of commitment, and do not list
or include letters whose sole purpose is to endorse the project.
C. Proposal Due Dates
Proposals must be submitted electronically by 5:00 p.m.
(submitter’s local time) on May 5, 1999. Copies of the signed proposal
cover sheet must be submitted in accordance with the instructions identified
below. The PI is responsible for the completeness
and accuracy of the proposal as submitted. Unless requested by the NSF,
additional information may not be sent following proposal submission.
Submission of Signed Cover Sheets: A printed copy
of the cover sheet (NSF Form 1207) must be endorsed by the PI(s) and authorized
institutional representative and mailed to NSF at the following address
for receipt within five working days of the proposal deadline:
A proposal may not be processed until the complete proposal
(including the signed cover sheet) has been received by NSF.
D. FastLane Requirements
The NSF FastLane system is available for electronic preparation
and submission of a proposal through the Web at the FastLane Web site at
<http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/>.
The Sponsored Research Office (SRO) or equivalent must provide a FastLane
Personal Identification Number (PIN) to each Principal Investigator (PI)
to gain access to the FastLane "Proposal Preparation" application. PIs
that have not submitted a proposal to NSF in the past must contact their
SRO to be added to the NSF PI database. This should be done as soon as
the decision to prepare a proposal is made.
In order to use NSF FastLane to prepare and submit a proposal,
the following are required:
PDF Reader (needed to view/print forms)
PDF Generator (needed to create project description)
A list of registered institutions and the FastLane registration
form are located on the FastLane Web page.
National Science Foundation
Division of Undergraduate Education
4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. 835
Arlington VA 22230
A. Merit Review Criteria
Review of proposals submitted to NSF are solicitedfrom
peers with expertise in the substantive area of the proposed research or
education project. These reviewers are selected by program officers charged
with the oversight of the review process. NSF invites the proposer to suggest
at the time of submission, the names of appropriate or inappropriate reviewers.
Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts with the proposer.
Special efforts are made to recruit reviewers from non-academic institutions,
minority serving institutions, adjacent disciplines to that principally
addressed in the proposal, etc.
General Review Criteria
Proposals will be reviewed against the following general
merit review criteria established by the National Science Board. Following
each criterion are potential considerations that the reviewer may employ
in the evaluation. These are suggestions and not all will apply to any
given proposal. Each reviewer will be asked to address only those that
are relevant to the proposal and for which he/she is qualified to make
judgments.
What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity? In light of the GK-12 program’s objectives, reviewers
will be asked to consider the above two merit review criteria with emphasis
placed on:
Additional Factors
Integration of Research and Education Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and
Activities B. Merit Review Process
Most of the proposals submitted to NSF are reviewed by
mail review, panel review, or some combination of mail and panel review.
Proposals submitted in response to this announcement will be reviewed by
panel review; the panel reviews may be supplemented by ad hoc reviews and
site visits as appropriate.
All proposals are carefully reviewed by at least three
other persons outside NSF who are experts in the particular field represented
by the proposal. Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation
to either support or decline each proposal. A program officer assigned
to manage the proposal’s review will consider the advice of reviewers and
will formulate a recommendation. In most cases, proposers will be contacted
by the program officer after his or her recommendation to award or decline
funding has been approved by his or her supervisor, the division director.
This informal notification is not a guarantee of an eventual award. NSF
will be able to tell applicants whether their proposals have been declined
or recommended for funding within six months for 95 percent of proposals
in this category. In those cases where a proposal is being considered for
joint funding by separate divisions, directorates, or agencies, NSF will
be able to inform applicants within nine months in 95 percent of proposals.
The time interval begins on the proposal deadline or target date, or from
the date of receipt if deadlines or target dates are not used by the program.
The interval ends when the division director accepts the program officer’s
recommendation.
In all cases, after final programmatic approval has been
obtained, award recommendations are then forwarded to the Division of Grants
and Agreements (DGA) for review of business, financial, and policy implications
and the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers
are cautioned that only a grants officer may make commitments, obligations,
or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment
on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions
with an NSF program officer. A PI or organization that makes financial
or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement
signed by the NSF grants officer does so at its own risk.
How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge
and understanding within its own field or across different fields? How
well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project?
(If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of prior work.)
To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative
and original concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed
activity? Is there sufficient access to resources?
How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding
while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed
activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender,
ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance
the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation,
networks, and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to
enhance scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits
of the proposed activity to society?
One of the principal strategies in support of NSF’s goals
is to foster integration of research and education through the programs,
projects and activities it supports at academic and research institutions.
These institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals may
concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students
and where all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the
excitement of discovery and enrich research through the diversity of learner
perspectives. PIs should address this issue in their proposal to provide
reviewers with the information necessary to respond fully to both NSF merit
review criteria. NSF staff will give it careful consideration in making
funding decisions.
Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation
of all citizens - women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons
with disabilities are essential to the health and vitality of science and
engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems
it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.
PIs should address this issue in their proposal to provide reviewers with
the information necessary to respond fully to both NSF merit review criteria.
NSF staff will give it careful consideration in making funding decisions.
AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
A. Notification of the Award
Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization
by a grants officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements (DGA). Organizations
whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by
the NSF office or division administering the program. Verbatim copies of
reviews, not including the identity of the reviewers, will be provided
automatically to the PI.
B. Grant Award Conditions
An NSF grant consists of (1) the award letter, which includes
any special provisions applicable to the grant and any numbered amendments
thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of
expense, on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates
any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the
proposal referenced in the award letter; (4) the applicable grant conditions,
such as Grant General Conditions (NSF GC-1) or Federal Demonstration Partnership
Phase III (FDP) Terms and Conditions,* and (5) any NSF brochure, program
guide, announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference
in the award letter. Electronic mail notification is the preferred way
to transmit NSF grants to organizations that have electronic mail capabilities
and have requested such notification from the Division of Grants and Agreements.
* These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF’s
Web site <http://www.nsf.gov/>.
Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone
(301) 947-2722, or by e-mail from <pubs@nsf.gov>.
Cooperative agreement awards also are administered in
accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions (CA-1).
More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions is contained in
Chapter II of the NSF Grant Policy Manual (GPM) (NSF 95-26), which
is available electronically on the NSF Web site. The GPM is also available
in paper copy by subscription from the Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The GPM may be ordered through the
GPO Web site <http://www.gpo.gov/>.
C. Reporting Requirements
For all multi-year grants (including both standard and
continuing grants), the PI must submit an annual project report to the
cognizant program officer at least 90 days before the end of the current
budget period.
Within 90 days after expiration of a grant, the PI also
is required to submit a final project report. Approximately 30 days before
expiration, NSF will send a notice to remind the PI of the requirement
to file the final project report. Failure to provide final technical reports
delays NSF review and processing of pending proposals for that PI. PIs
should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure
availability of required data.
NSF has implemented a new electronic project reporting
system, available through FastLane, which permits electronic submission
and updating of project reports, including information on project participants
(individual and organizational), activities and findings, publications,
and other specific products and contributions. Reports will continue to
be required annually and after the expiration of the grant, but PIs will
not need to re-enter information previously provided, either with the proposal
or in earlier updates using the electronic system.
Effective October 1, 1998, PIs are required to use the
new reporting format for annual and final project reports. PIs are strongly
encouraged to submit reports electronically via FastLane. For those PIs
who cannot access FastLane, paper copies of the new report formats may
be obtained from the NSF Clearinghouse as specified above. NSF expects
to require electronic submission of all annual and final project reports
via FastLane beginning in October 1999.
D. New Awardee Information
If the submitting organization has never received an NSF
award, it is recommended that the organization’s appropriate administrative
officials become familiar with the policies and procedures in the NSF Grant
Policy Manual which are applicable to most NSF awards. The Prospective
New Awardee Guide (NSF 97-100) includes Administration and Management
Information; Accounting System Requirements and Auditing Information; and
information on Payments to Organizations with Awards. This information
will assist an organization in preparing documents that NSF requires to
conduct administrative and financial reviews of an organization. The guide
also serves as a means of highlighting the accountability requirements
associated with Federal awards. This document is available electronically
on NSF’s Web site <http://www.nsf.gov/>.
If warranted, NSF may assemble a list of Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQ) relating to this announcement. Any FAQ prepared will be
accessible through the GK-12 program’s home page <http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/gk12/>.
Inquiries regarding the GK-12 program should be directed
to one of the following staff contacts:
Carter Kimsey
Anthony Maddox
Wyn Jennings
Mary Poats
Michael Mayhew
Henry Blount
Steven Breckler
Fae Korsmo
Directorate for Education and Human Resources (703-306-1670;
<dstout@nsf.gov>)
Directorate for Biological Sciences (703-306-1469; <ckimsey@nsf.gov>)
Directorate for Computer and Information Science and
Engineering (703-306-1981; <amaddox@nsf.gov>)
Directorate for Education and Human Resources (703-306-1696;
<pjenning@nsf.gov>)
Directorate for Engineering (703-306-1380; <mpoats@nsf.gov>)
Directorate for Geosciences (703-306-1557; <mmayhew@nsf.gov>)
Directorate for Mathematics and Physical Sciences (703-306-1946;
<hblount@nsf.gov>)
Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences
(703-306-1728; <sbreckle@nsf.gov>)
Office of Polar Programs (703-306-1029; <fkorsmo@nsf.gov>)
The NSF Guide to Programs is a compilation of funding
opportunities for research and education in science, mathematics, and engineering.
General descriptions of NSF programs, research areas, and eligibility information
for proposal submission are provided in each chapter. Beginning in fiscal
year 1999, the Guide will only be available electronically. It is
accessible at the NSF Web site <http://www.nsf.gov/>.
The direct URL for the Guide is <http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gp>.
Many NSF programs offer announcements concerning specific proposal requirements.
To obtain additional information about these requirements, contact the
appropriate NSF program offices listed in Appendix A of the GPG.
Any changes in NSF’s fiscal year programs occurring after
press time for the Guide to Programs will be announced in the NSF
E-Bulletin,
which is also available electronically at the NSF Web site. The direct
URL for the most recent issue of the E-Bulletin is <http://www.nsf.gov/home/ebulletin/>. Subscribers can also sign up for NSF's Custom News Service to find out
what funding opportunities are available.
The National Science Foundation promotes
and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively
awarding grants for research and education in the sciences, mathematics
and engineering.
To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Web site at:
The National Science Foundation (NSF) funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. Grantees are wholly responsible for conducting their project activities and preparing the results for publication. Thus, the Foundation does not assume responsibility for such findings or their interpretation.
NSF welcomes proposals from all qualified scientists, engineers and educators. The Foundation strongly encourages women, minorities, and persons with disabilities to compete fully in its programs. In accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and NSF policies, no person on grounds of race, color, age, sex, national origin, or disability shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving financial assistance from NSF (unless otherwise specified in the eligibility requirements for a particular program).
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities (investigators and other staff, including student research assistants) to work on NSF-supported projects. See the program announcement or contact the program coordinator at (703) 306-1636.
The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation regarding NSF programs, employment, or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 306-0090 or through FIRS on 1 (800) 877-8339.
The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the review process; to applicant institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies needing information as part of the review process or in order to coordinate programs; and to another Federal agency, court or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding this burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Reports Clearance Officer; Information Dissemination Branch, DAS; National Science Foundation; Arlington, VA 22230.
In accordance with Important Notice No. 120 dated June 27, 1997, Subject: Year 2000 Computer Problem, NSF awardees are reminded of their responsibility to take appropriate actions to ensure that the NSF activity being supported is not adversely affected by the Year 2000 problem. Potentially affected items include: computer systems, databases, and equipment. The National Science Foundation should be notified if an awardee concludes that the Year 2000 will have a significant impact on its ability to carry out an NSF funded activity. Information concerning Year 2000 activities can be found on the NSF web site at <http://www.nsf.gov/oirm/y2k/start.htm>.
NSF 99-75
OMB No. 3145-0023
Electronic Dissemination Only