EARTH SYSTEM HISTORY (ESH)
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION |
AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS |
AWARD INFORMATION |
PROPOSAL PREPARATION & SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS |
PROPOSAL REVIEW INFORMATION |
AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION |
CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
OTHER PROGRAMS OF INTEREST |
ABOUT NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION |
EARTH SYSTEM HISTORY (ESH)
DIRECTORATE FOR GEOSCIENCES
Division of Atmospheric Sciences
Division of Earth Sciences
Division of Ocean Sciences
OFFICE OF POLAR PROGRAMS
OFFICE OF GLOBAL PROGRAMS
DEADLINE FOR PROPOSAL RECEIPT: FEBRUARY 14, 2000
FEBRUARY 14, 2001
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress
in the United States by competitively awarding grants for research and
education in the sciences, mathematics and engineering.
To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies
of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Web
|Location:|| 4201 Wilson
Arlington, VA 22230
| For General Information (NSF
Information Center):|| (703) 306-1234|
|TDD (for the hearing-impaired):
|| (703) 306-0090|
|To Order Publications or Forms:|| Send an e-mail
or telephone: (301) 947-2722
|To Locate NSF Employees:|| (703) 306-1234|
SUMMARY OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
Program Name: Earth System History (ESH)
Short Description/Synopsis of Program: The goal of ESH is to
encourage research to understand the natural variability of the Earth system
through records preserved in geo-biologic archives and to contribute to a
comprehensive understanding of climate change with annual to millennial
resolution, including the forcing mechanisms, interactions and feedbacks
among its components.
Cognizant Program Officer: Dr. Steven Colman, Program Officer, Room
775, Division of Atmospheric Sciences, National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA, 22230, telephone 703.306.1527, e-mail:
Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) No.:
47.078 Office of Polar Programs
11.431 NOAA Global Change
PI eligibility limitations: See NSF Grant
Proposal Guide (GPG), NSF 00-2 (or later) for general eligibility
Type of award anticipated: Standard or
Number of annual awards anticipated:
30-50 new awards, with award size ranging from $20,000 - $1,000,000 per year.
Typical award durations are expected to be two-three years, but may be up to
five years for large, multi-investigator projects.
Amount of funds available: Approximately $3 - $4 million is expected to be
available each year for new awards.
of awards: July of 2000 and 2001
PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
Proposal Preparation Instructions
Intent requirements: None
Proposal preparation instructions: Standard NSF
GPG (NSF 00-2, or later) instructions
proposal preparation instructions: The proposal should include a description
of the anticipated data and information products, quality control and
documentation in proposal Section I. All proposals should include a
statement in "Results from Prior Research" indicating the disposition of data
products generated by the most recently completed Federally-funded research
project. If the PI has received an award from the NOAA Paleoclimatology
Program within the last five years, a report on that award should be included
in addition to the Results from Prior NSF Research. The NSF-UNOLS
Ship Time Request Form must accompany all proposals requesting ship time
(available on Web page: http://www.geo.nsf.gov/oce/sreqform.html.
This form should be appended as a PDF file as part of Section H, Facilities,
Equipment and Other Resources.
Each proposal must include a section explicitly describing how the proposed
work will contribute to one or more of the nine areas of special emphasis.
Proposals without such a statement may be returned without review.
Deviations from standard (GPG) proposal preparation instructions: None other than
Cost-sharing/matching requirements: Not required and will not be a
factor in the review process.
Indirect cost (F&A)limitations: None
Other budgetary limitations: None
Use of FastLane required.
FastLane Point of contact: Kandace Binkley, Room 725, Division of Ocean Sciences, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, telephone 703.306.1582,
5:00 PM, local time, February 14, 2000 and 2001
PROPOSAL REVIEW INFORMATION
Merit Review Criteria: Standard National Science
Board-approved criteria. See Merit Review Criteria, p. 9
Priority will be given to proposals that reviewers indicate have the
most relevance to one or more of the nine areas described under "Areas
of Special Emphasis".
AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
Grant Award Conditions: GC-1 or FDP III
Special grant conditions anticipated: Field logistics and support may
require special handling.
Special reporting requirements anticipated: None
Earth System History
Related to the NSF Global Change Research Program
FY 2000 and 2001
Earth System History (ESH) is a research initiative of the U.S. Global Change
Research Program (USGCRP). It includes coordinated paleoscience programs
supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Divisions of Atmospheric
Sciences (ATM), Earth Sciences (EAR) and Ocean Sciences (OCE) and the Office
of Polar Programs (OPP), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) Office of Global Programs.
As the paleoscience component of the USGCRP, the emphasis of ESH is upon the
Earth's paleoenvironmental system. In this context, the term "Earth system"
refers to critical elements of the coupled
atmosphere-biosphere-cryosphere-hydrosphere and terrestrial system. ESH
proposals need not focus purely upon climate per se, but it should be clear
how the project will contribute to understanding climate related processes
and Earth system response.
The goal of ESH research is to understand the natural variability of the
Earth system through records preserved in geo-biologic archives and to
contribute to a comprehensive understanding of climate change with annual to
millennial resolution, including the forcing mechanisms, interactions and
feedbacks among its components.
The importance of the ESH Program as an element of the USGCRP stems from its
unique capabilities to: (1) document the past temporal and spatial
variability of the Earth system on timescales longer than the instrumental
record; (2) assess the rates of change associated with this variability; (3)
determine the sensitivity of the earth system to variations in key forcing
factors, such as greenhouse gases, volcanism, orbital forcing, and solar
irradiance; (4) examine the response of the Earth system to a variety of
climatic perturbations, (5) evaluate the simulations of numerical models
under conditions very different from those of the present day. These
attributes represent the criteria by which ESH investigations can be viewed
as contributions to the USGCRP.
ESH represents a U.S. contribution to Past Global Changes (PAGES), a core
project of the International Geosphere - Biosphere Programme (IGBP) and to
Climate Variability and Predictability (CLIVAR), a core project of the World
Climate Research Program (WCRP). ESH proposals are encouraged to address,
but are not limited to, PAGES and PAGES-CLIVAR objectives. ESH is
coordinated with paleoscience efforts in the National Science Foundation,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Geological Survey, and
other Federal agencies.
Assessment of future climate changes and their effects requires understanding
the full range of the Earth's variability and how the interlinked systems of
ice, ocean, atmosphere, continents and biosphere respond to changing climate
conditions. Integrated responses of the Earth system to climatic
perturbations are preserved in natural archives of many types including:
tree-rings, ice cores, corals, ancient soil deposits and marine, lake and
terrestrial sediments. These records provide the data needed to understand
the natural behavior of the Earth system and will provide the temporal
perspective for evaluating more recent human-induced impacts.
The paleoclimate and geologic record includes information on: (1) natural
temporal and spatial variability, (2) periods of extreme climate and episodes
of rapid climate and ecological change, (3) major changes in ocean and
atmospheric circulation and composition, and (4) regional effects of climate
fluctuations. These features present intellectual, observational, and
analytical challenges that must be met in order to understand changes in
climate that occur on societal time scales.
AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS
The ESH Program invites proposals addressing the following areas of special
emphasis. Depending on the scope of the project, proposals may be from
individual investigators or from teams of investigators to work on
crosscutting scientific issues involving multiproxy or interdisciplinary
efforts. Linkage with programs at the international level is encouraged, but
1. Paleoclimate Variability at Annual-Decadal Resolution: Proposals
should address the collection and analysis of high-resolution time series to
advance the study of patterns, processes, and causes of interannual to
century-scale climatic and environmental variability. Priorities within this
area of emphasis are to define the full range of natural environmental and
climatic variability, to understand how this variability is affected by
changes in external forcing, and to focus on societally-relevant climate
variability. Examples of paleoclimate variability research include
investigations of a) ENSO atmosphere-ocean interaction and extratropical
linkages, b) Tropical/North Atlantic variability, including interactions
between tropical processes and regional drought, the North Atlantic
Oscillation, and thermohaline circulation, c) Asian/African monsoon dynamics
and linkages with ENSO and extratropical variability, d) Shallow meridional
ocean circulation and other processes that link tropical and extratropical
climate variability, and e) North American drought and flood dynamics.
Proposals should fit one of the two PAGES/CLIVAR temporal streams. Stream I:
to reconstruct the detailed history of climatic and environmental change for
the entire globe for the period since 2000 B.P., with temporal resolution
that is at least subdecadal, and ideally annual or seasonal. Stream II: to
reconstruct histories of climatic and environmental change with annual to
decadal temporal resolution for intervals within the last two glacial cycles,
in order to improve our understanding of the natural processes that involve
global climatic changes.
2. Rapid Climate Change: Proposals should address the use of
paleoclimate records to document the frequency, temporal resolution, and
spatial extent of past rapid climate changes, particularly those that have
occurred during interglacial warm periods such as the Holocene. The use of
paleoclimate data in combination with modern climate dynamics, meteorology,
and climate modeling is highly encouraged. The priorities within this area of
emphasis are a) to understand the mechanisms and forcings associated with
rapid climate changes, as well as the feedbacks that reinforce or counteract
such changes; and b) to characterize and quantify the response of the various
components of the Earth system to rapid changes in climate. Proposals may
address rapid changes in the Earth's climate system that have occurred over
multiple time scales, ranging from smaller scale regional regime shifts to
large global-scale reorganizations of the climate system. Examples of more
recent (past 2,000 years) rapid changes include the mid-1970s ENSO regime
shift in the Pacific basin, changes in amount and spatial distribution of
rainfall associated with the African-Asian monsoon system, and hydrologic
regime shifts in North America. Examples of events occurring on longer time
scales include both glacial (e.g., Heinrich events, Dansgaard-Oeschger
cycles) and interglacial (e.g., 8 kyr cooling event during the Holocene)
periods. A higher priority will be placed on studies of rapid climate
changes that have occurred during interglacial periods. On the longest time
scales, rapid changes such as those of the middle Pliocene increase in
northern hemisphere glaciation, and the warming event across the
Paleocene/Eocene boundary would be appropriate.
3. Extreme Warm Conditions: Proposals should address such
issues as (a) improved characterization of intervals with climates warmer
than those of the present, (b) conceptual models to explain the origin and/or
termination of warm states, and (c) the feedbacks that maintain global
climate during a warm phase. Examples of such intervals include, but are not
limited to: the early Holocene, MIS Stage 5e, MIS Stage 11, the Middle
Pliocene, the Middle Miocene, and the late Paleocene/early Eocene. A higher
priority will be placed on younger intervals, because they are closer to
matching present-day boundary conditions and therefore more relevant to
understanding future climate change. However, proposals for older intervals
will be accepted if they make a clear case for validating or testing of model
predictions, or establishing how different parts of the Earth system interact
under conditions of extreme warmth.
4. Spatial Patterns and Continuous Records of Climate Change.
Proposals should address large-scale spatial aspects of climate change,
particularly tropical-extratropical linkages and interhemispheric comparisons
revealed in continuous marine and terrestrial records. Understanding spatial
patterns of past climate changes, the degree of synchroneity or phasing
between different areas, and the relation between low latitude and high
latitude regions are critical aspects of paleoclimate studies and are
necessary to test and improve climate models. Proposals related to
international efforts such as those of PAGES (the PANASH project,
Pole-Equator-Pole (PEP) transects, IMAGES, and continental drilling for
paleoclimate records) are encouraged. Efforts in other areas, such as
data-poor locations or locations that form links between PEP transects, and
which contribute to a spatial network of paleoclimatic sites capable of
addressing regional variability, are also encouraged. Various time scales are
relevant, but those with annual resolution for the past 2,000 years and those
with century to millenial scale resolution for the last few glacial cycles
are especially encouraged.
5. Arctic Paleoclimate Studies. The sensitivity of the Arctic
to climate change and the fundamental importance of the cryosphere as an
influence on the climate system mandate special attention to Arctic
paleoclimate research. Close collaboration between the ESH Program and both
the Arctic System Science (ARCSS) and Arctic Natural Science (ANS) Programs
within the Office of Polar Programs (OPP) at NSF has resulted in a detailed
science-and-implementation plan (PARCS, 1999--Paleoenvironmental Arctic
Sciences: The Arctic Paleosciences in the Context of Global Change
Research). The ESH program encourages proposals that address the
paleoclimatic issues identified in the PARCS document.
6. Modeling of Past Change: Proposals should focus on the use
of Earth system models to investigate the patterns, processes, and causes of
past climatic and environmental change. An evaluation of Earth system model
simulations of past change using paleoclimatic and paleoenvironmental data is
an important step in assessing the ability of these models to simulate
realistic future change. Studies should focus on using models to assess the
sensitivity of the Earth system to hypothesized forcing, and to evaluate the
simulated responses using paleoclimate data. Proposals can include the
development or improvement of an Earth system model addressing a specific
paleoclimate question, but must incorporate rigorous comparisons with
paleoclimate/paleoenvironmental data and the testing of paleoclimate
hypotheses. Paleoclimate modeling proposals should be closely integrated
with one of the other five ESH areas of emphasis to ensure that the
predictive Earth system models being used provide realistic simulations of
climate variability, abrupt change, climate extremes, or regional change.
For all areas of emphasis, priority will be given to proposals that seek to
use the record of past conditions to understand the dynamics of climate/Earth
system processes or to integrate local/regional reponses into the large-scale
climate system. Proposals confined to descriptive reconstructions of local or
regional conditions, without consideration of how those conditions result
from or contribute to large-scale processes, will receive a lower priority.
In general, the emphasis should be upon understanding mechanisms, processes,
and linkages between different elements of the earth/ocean/atmosphere
In addition to the areas of emphasis above, proposals will be
considered in the following areas:
7. Quantification and development of biotic, physical, and geochemical proxy indicators for
past Earth system processes;
8. Improvement of geochronological techniques relevant to ESH goals; and
9. Innovative development and application of statistical techniques that
combine and simultaneously analyze various types of paleoclimate data to
address regionally specific climate questions.
Each proposal must include a section explicitly describing how the proposed work
will contribute to one or more of these nine areas. Proposals without such a
statement may be returned without review.
Data Management: Each proposal must adhere to the USGCRP data management
and the policies applying to recipients of Federal funding in the
geosciences. Unless otherwise specified in the proposal, the PI/PD will be
responsible for ensuring that all data generated by the funded project will
be documented and submitted to the World Data Center for Paleoclimatology at
the National Geophysical Data Center in Boulder, CO (guidelines for data
submission available at http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/contrib.html.
The proposal should include a description of the anticipated data and
information products, quality control and documentation, as well as any
anticipated costs for these activities. A supplemental section entitled
"Data and Information Availability" may be added to the proposal
(proposal Section I) and is not counted in the Project Description page
limitation. Details on this supplemental documentation are included in the
NSF Grant Proposal Guide (NSF 00-2, or later). All proposals should include
a statement in "Results from Prior Research" indicating the
disposition of data products generated by the most recently completed
Federally funded research project.
Depending on the scope of the project, proposals may be from individual
investigators or from teams of investigators to work on crosscutting
scientific issues involving multiproxy or interdisciplinary efforts. Linkage
with programs at the international level is encouraged, but not required.
Under this announcement, NSF solicits proposals for any funding amount up to
$1.0 million per year for up to five years, and expects to make grants over a
wide range of award sizes and durations. Depending on availability of funds,
it is expected that approximately $3 - $4 million will be available each year
for new awards. Awards may be made as standard or continuing grants.
PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
A. Proposal Preparation Instructions.
Proposals submitted in response to this program announcement should be
prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines contained in
the Grant Proposal Guide (GPG), NSF 00-2 (or later). The complete text
of the GPG (including electronic forms) is available electronically on the
NSF Web site at: http://www.nsf.gov . Paper
copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse,
telephone 301.947.2722 or by e-mail from firstname.lastname@example.org.
Proposers are reminded to identify the program announcement number (NSF
00-11) in the program announcement/solicitation block on the NSF Form 1207,
"Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science Foundation".
Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant
proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay
If the PI (or any co-PI identified on the proposal) has received NSF funding
in the past five years, information on the prior award is required. If the
proposer has received more than one prior award (excluding amendments), the
proposer should report on the award most closely related to the proposal. If
a PI or co-PI has received an award from the NOAA Paleoclimatology Program
within the last 5 years, information on that prior award is also required.
See the GPG for further instructions concerning this section.
Studies requiring a multi-institutional effort may be proposed by submission
of several separate, but closely collaborative, proposals having common
overall objectives or by a single omnibus proposal containing disciplinary
components. In the latter case, only one institution should submit the
proposal, which should include signed cover pages, budgets, curricula vitae,
etc. for all investigators and institutions involved. Omnibus proposals may
exceed the 15-page limit only if written permission is obtained from the
appropriate NSF Assistant Director, Office Head or other designee. A copy of
this permission must be included with the proposal in accordance with
directions in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (NSF 00-2, or later).
B. Budgetary Information.
Cost Sharing Requirements: No cost sharing is required for proposals
submitted in response to this announcement.
C. Proposal Due Dates.
All proposals MUST be submitted by 5:00 PM local time, February 14.
Copies of the signed proposal cover sheet (NSF Form 1207) must be postmarked
(or provide a legible proof of mailing date assigned by the carrier) within
five working days following the electronic submission of the proposal and
forwarded to the following address:
National Science Foundation
DIS-FastLane Cover Sheet
4201 Wilson Blvd.
Arlington, VA 22230
A proposal may not be processed until the complete proposal (including signed
Cover Sheet) has been received by NSF.
D. FastLane Requirements.
Proposers are required to prepare and submit proposals using the NSF FastLane
system. Detailed instructions for proposal preparation and submission via
FastLane are available at https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm
Submission of Signed Cover Sheets. The signed paper copy of
the proposal Cover Sheet (NSF Form 1207) should be forwarded to NSF within
five working days following proposal submission in accordance with FastLane
proposal preparation and submission instructions referenced above.
PROPOSAL REVIEW INFORMATION
A. Merit Review Criteria..
Reviews of proposals submitted to NSF are solicited from peers with
expertise in the substantive area of the proposed research or education
project. These reviewers are selected by program officers charged with the
oversight of the review process. NSF invites the proposer to suggest, at the
time of submission, the names of appropriate or inappropriate reviewers.
Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts with the proposer.
Special efforts are made to recruit reviewers from non-academic institutions,
minority serving institutions or adjacent disciplines to that principally
addressed in the proposal.
Proposals will be reviewed against the following general merit review
criteria established by the National Science Board. Following each criterion
are potential considerations that the reviewer may employ in the evaluation.
These are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. Each
reviewer will be asked to address only those that are relevant to the
proposal and for which he/she is qualified to make judgments.
What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?
How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and
understanding within its own field or across different fields? How well
qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? (If
appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of prior work.) To
what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and
original concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed
activity? Is there sufficient access to resources?
What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?
How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while
promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed
activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender,
ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the
infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities,
instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the results be
disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding?
What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?
PIs should address the following elements in their proposal to provide
reviewers with the information necessary to respond fully to both NSF merit
review criteria. NSF staff will give these factors careful consideration in
making funding decisions.
Integration of Research and Education
One of the principal strategies in support of NSFs goals is to foster
integration of research and education through the programs, projects and
activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These
institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals may
concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students
and where all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the
excitement of discovery and enrich research through the diversity of learner
Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities
Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens -- women and men,
underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities -- are essential
to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to
this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects,
and activities it considers and supports.
B. Review Protocol and Associated Customer Service Standard.
All proposals are carefully reviewed by at least three other persons outside
NSF who are experts in the particular field represented by the proposal.
Proposals submitted in response to this announcement will be reviewed by both
mail and panel review.
Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support or
decline each proposal. A program officer assigned to manage the proposal's
review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a
recommendation. In most cases, proposers will be contacted by the program
officer after his or her recommendation to award or decline funding has been
approved by his or her supervisor, the division director. This informal
notification is not a guarantee of an eventual award. NSF will be able to
tell applicants whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for
funding within six months for 95 percent of proposals. The time interval
begins on the proposal deadline or target date or from the date of receipt,
if deadlines or target dates are not used by the program. The interval ends
when the division director accepts the program officer's recommendation.
In all cases, after programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals
recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and
Agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications and the
processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers are
cautioned that only a Grants Officer may make commitments, obligations or
awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment
on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions
with an NSF Program officer. A principal investigator or organization that
makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or
cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants Officer does so at its own
AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
A. Notification of the Award.
Notification of the award is made to the submitting
organization by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and
Agreements. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as
promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Division administering the program.
Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will
be provided automatically to the Principal Investigator.
B. Grant Award Conditions.
An NSF grant consists of: (1) the award letter, which includes any special
provisions applicable to the grant and any numbered amendments thereto; (2)
the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which
NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals
or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the
award letter; (4) the applicable grant conditions, such as Grant General
Conditions (NSF GC-1)* or Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) Terms and
Conditions* and (5) any NSF brochure, program guide, announcement or other
NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award letter.
Electronic mail notification is the preferred way to transmit NSF grants to
organizations that have electronic mail capabilities and have requested such
notification from the Division of Grants and Agreements.
* These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Web site at:
http://www.nsf.gov Paper copies may be obtained from the
NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone 301-947-2722 or by e-mail from
More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions is contained in the
NSF Grant Policy Manual (GPM) Chapter II, (NSF 95-26) available
electronically on the NSF Web site. The GPM is also available in paper copy
by subscription from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing
Office, Washington, DC 20402. The GPM may be ordered through the GPO Web
site at: http://www.gpo.gov.
The telephone number at GPO for subscription information is (202) 512-1800.
C. Reporting Requirements.
For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants),
the PI must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer
at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period.
Within 90 days after expiration of a grant, the PI also is
required to submit a final project report. Approximately 30 days before
expiration, NSF will send a notice to remind the PI of the requirement to
file the final project report. Failure to provide final technical reports
delays NSF review and processing of pending proposals for that PI. PIs
should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure
availability of required data.
NSF has implemented a new electronic reporting system, available through FastLane,
which permits electronic submission and updating of project reports,
including information on: project participants (individual and
organizational); activities and findings; publications; and other specific
products and contributions. Reports will continue to be required annually
and after the expiration of the grant, but PIs will not need to re-enter
information previously provided, either with the proposal or in earlier
updates using the electronic system.
Effective October 1, 1999, PIs are required to use the new reporting system
for submission of annual and final project reports.
D. New Awardee Information.
If the submitting organization has never received an NSF award, it is recommended that the
organization's appropriate administrative officials become familiar with the
policies and procedures in the NSF Grant Policy Manual which are
applicable to most NSF awards. The "Prospective New Awardee Guide" (NSF
99-78) includes information on: Administration and Management Information;
Accounting System Requirements and Auditing Information; and Payments to
Organizations with Awards. This information will assist an organization in
preparing documents that NSF requires to conduct administrative and financial
reviews of an organization. The guide also serves as a means of highlighting
the accountability requirements associated with Federal awards. This
document is available electronically on NSF's Web site at:
CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Inquiries concerning the ESH program may be directed to:
Dr. Steven Colman, Program Officer
Room 775, Division of Atmospheric Sciences
National Science Foundation
4201 Wilson Blvd.
Arlington, VA, 22230
Ms. Heather Benway
Office of Global Programs
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
1100 Wayne Ave., Suite 1210
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Telephone 301.427.2089 x 113
For questions related to use of FastLane, contact Kandace Binkely,
703-306-1580, e-mail: email@example.com.
OTHER PROGRAMS OF INTEREST
The NSF Guide to Programs is a compilation of funding for research and
education in science, mathematics, and engineering. General descriptions of
NSF programs, research areas, and eligibility information for proposal
submission are provided in each chapter. Many NSF programs offer
announcements concerning specific proposal requirements. To obtain additional
information about these requirements, contact the appropriate NSF program
offices listed in Appendix A of the GPG. Any changes in NSF's fiscal year
programs occurring after press time for the Guide to Programs will be
announced in the NSF Bulletin, available monthly (except July and August),
and in individual program announcements. The Bulletin is available
electronically via the NSF Web Site at http://www.nsf.gov. The direct URL for recent
issues of the Bulletin is http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/news/publicat/bulletin/bulletin.htm Subscribers can also sign up for NSF's Custom News Service to find out what funding opportunities are available.
ABOUT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
The National Science Foundation (NSF) funds research and education in most
fields of science and engineering. Grantees are wholly responsible for
conducting their project activities and preparing the results for
publication. Thus, the Foundation does not assume responsibility for such
findings or their interpretation.
NSF welcomes proposals from all qualified scientists, engineers and
educators. The Foundation strongly encourages women, minorities, and persons
with disabilities to compete fully in its programs. In accordance with
federal statutes, regulations, and NSF policies, no person on grounds of
race, color, age, sex, national origin, or disability shall be excluded from
participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under any program or activity receiving financial assistance
from NSF (unless otherwise specified in the eligibility requirements for a
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED)
provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with
disabilities (investigators and other staff, including student research
assistants) to work on NSF-supported projects. See the program announcement
or contact the program coordinator at (703) 306-1636.
The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and
Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals
with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation regarding NSF
programs, employment, or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703)
306-0090 or through FIRS on 1-800-877-8339.
PRIVACY ACT AND PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENTS
The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited
under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as
amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with
the selection of qualified proposals; project reports submitted by awardees
will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch
and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified
reviewers and staff assistants as part of the review process; to applicant
institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review
process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government
contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary
to complete assigned work; to other government agencies needing information
as part of the review process or in order to coordinate programs; and to
another Federal agency, court or party in a court or Federal administrative
proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal
Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential
candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See
Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and
Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51,
"Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 268
(January 5, 1998). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to
provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of
receiving an award.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to
average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions. Send comments regarding this burden estimate and any other
aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing
this burden, to: Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer; Division of
Administrative Services; National Science Foundation; Arlington, VA
YEAR 2000 REMINDER
In accordance with Important Notice No. 120 dated June 27, 1997, Subject:
Year 2000 Computer Problem, NSF awardees are reminded of their responsibility
to take appropriate actions to ensure that the NSF activity being supported
is not adversely affected by the Year 2000 problem. Potentially affected
items include: computer systems, databases, and equipment. The National
Science Foundation should be notified if an awardee concludes that the Year
2000 will have a significant impact on its ability to carry out an NSF funded
activity. Information concerning Year 2000 activities can be found on the NSF
web site at http://www.nsf.gov/oirm/y2k/start.htm
The National Science Foundation is committed to making all of the information we publish
easy to understand. If you have a suggestion about how to improve the
clarity of this document or other NSF-published materials, please contact us
CFDA # 47.050 Geosciences
47.078 Office of Polar Programs
11.431 NOAA Global Change Research
NSF 00-11 (replaces NSF 97-161)
(Electronic Dissemination Only)