DIVISION OF INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS
DEADLINE(S): October 22, 2001
(In future years, October 1 annually)
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering.
To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Web Site at:
||4201 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22230|
|Send an e-mail to:||email@example.com|
|or telephone:||(301) 947-2722|
International Research Fellowship Program (IRFP)
Synopsis of Program:
The objective of the International Research Fellowship Program is to introduce scientists and engineers in the early stages of their careers to opportunities abroad, thereby furthering NSF's goal of establishing productive, mutually-beneficial relationships between U.S. and foreign science and engineering communities. These awards are available for research in any field of science and engineering research and education supported by NSF. Foreign science or engineering centers and other centers of excellence in all geographical regions are eligible host institutions.
Cognizant Program Officer:
Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number:
PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
B. Budgetary Information
C. Deadline Dates
D. FastLane Requirements
PROPOSAL REVIEW INFORMATION
AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
SUMMARY OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
APPENDIX A - FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
The objective of the International Research Fellowship Program is to introduce scientists and engineers in the early stages of their careers to opportunities abroad, thereby furthering NSF's goal of establishing productive, mutually-beneficial relationships between U.S. and foreign science and engineering communities.
II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
These awards are available for research in any field of science and engineering research or education supported by NSF. Applicants are encouraged to consider any site that will afford them a unique and beneficial research experience.
Appropriate organizations include institutions of higher education, industrial research institutions/laboratories, government research institutes/laboratories/centers, nonprofit research organizations, and foreign sites or centers of excellence.
Eligible applicants, in addition to being citizens or permanent residents of the United States, must have earned a doctoral degree within six years before the date of application, or expect to receive the doctoral degree by the award date. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities are strongly encouraged to apply.
Support may be requested for residence abroad of three to 24 months. The 24-month period may include one year (or some portion of the total duration) at the foreign site and one year (or duration equal to the foreign tenure) used as a "re-entry" year in the United States. Awardees are expected to work full time on their research projects. Support is not provided for teaching, writing textbooks, preparation of prior research results for publication, or similar activities.
Bioscience research with disease-related goals, including work on the etiology, diagnosis, or treatment of physical or mental diseases, abnormality, or malfunction in human beings or animals is normally not supported. Animal models of such conditions, or the development or testing of drugs or other procedures for their treatment also generally are not eligible for support. However, research in bioengineering with diagnosis or treatment-related goals, that applies engineering principles to problems in biology and medicine while advancing engineering knowledge is eligible for support. Bioengineering research to aid persons with disabilities is also eligible.
III. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION
Limitations on the number of applications that may be submitted by an individual:
Recipients of previous International Research Fellowship awards are not eligible.
Host Site Eligibility:
Appropriate host sites are foreign science or engineering centers in all geographical regions. Appropriate establishments include institutions of higher education, industrial research institutions/laboratories, government research institutes/laboratories/centers, and non-profit research organizations. (For those interested in research in Japan, contact Susan Parris for specific instructions.)
IV. AWARD INFORMATION
Total program support will be approximately $1 Million in FY2002, pending availablity of funds.
Anticipated date of awards: March annually.
Approximately 20-30 fellowships will be offered each year to U.S. investigators for research abroad.
Average award size: $60,000.
V. PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
A. Proposal Preparation Instructions
Proposals submitted in response to this program announcement should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (GPG). The complete text of the GPG is available electronically on the NSF Web Site at: http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpg.
The complete application consists of:
B. Budgetary Information
C. Deadline Dates
October 22, 2001 (In future years, October 1, annually). The proposals must be submitted via FastLane by 5:00 PM, local time.
D. FastLane Requirements
Proposers are required to prepare and submit all proposals for this Program Announcement through the FastLane system. Select Postdoctoral Fellowships on the FastLane Home Page (https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/fastlane.htm) for links to detailed information. All PDF files must be created using the detailed instructions found at https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/pdfcreat.htm. For FastLane user support, call 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org.
VI. PROPOSAL REVIEW INFORMATION
A. NSF Proposal Review Process
Reviews of proposals submitted to NSF are solicited from peers with expertise in the substantive area of the proposed research or education project. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight of the review process. NSF invites the proposer to suggest at the time of submission, the names of appropriate or inappropriate reviewers. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts with the proposer. Special efforts are made to recruit reviewers from non-academic institutions, minority-serving institutions, or adjacent disciplines to that principally addressed in the proposal.
Proposals will be reviewed against the following general review criteria established by the National Science Board. Following each criterion are potential considerations that the reviewer may employ in the evaluation. These are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. Each reviewer will be asked to address only those that are relevant to the proposal and for which he/she is qualified to make judgements.
What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?
How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? (If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of the prior work.) To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources?
What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?
How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?
Principal Investigators should address the following elements in their proposal to provide reviewers with the information necessary to respond fully to both of the above-described NSF merit review criteria. NSF staff will give these elements careful consideration in making funding decisions.Integration of Research and Education
One of the principal strategies in support of NSF's goals is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals may concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students and where all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the excitement of discovery and enrich research through the diversity of learning perspectives.Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities
Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens - women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities - is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.
Additional Review Criteria
In addition to the above mentioned review criteria, for this program, the reviewers are asked to consider the following International Science and Engineering criteria:
A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and signed by each reviewer. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers, are mailed to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Director. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding.
B. Review Protocol and Associated Customer Service Standard
Most proposals submitted to NSF are reviewed by mail review, panel review, or some combination of mail and panel review. Proposals submitted in response to this announcement will be reviewed by mail and/or panel review.
All proposals are carefully reviewed by at least three other persons outside NSF who are experts in the particular field represented by the proposal. Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support or decline each proposal. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation. In most cases, proposers will be contacted by the Program Officer after his/her recommendation to award or decline funding has been approved by his/her supervisor, the Division Director. This informal notification is not a guarantee of an eventual award.
NSF is striving to be able to tell applicants whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months for 70 percent of proposals. The time interval begins on the date of receipt. The interval ends when the Division Director accepts the Program Officer's recommendation.
In all cases, after programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications and the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at its own risk.
VII. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
An NSF award consists of: (1) the award letter, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award letter; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (NSF-GC-1)* or Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) Terms and Conditions * and (5) any NSF brochure, program guide, announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award letter.
*These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's web site at http://www.nsf.gov/home/grants/grants_gac.htm. Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (301) 947-2722 or by e-mail from email@example.com.
More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions is contained in the NSF Grant Policy Manual (GPM) Chapter II, (NSF 95-26) available electronically on the NSF web site at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpm. The GPM is also for sale through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402. The telephone number at GPO for subscription information is (202) 512-1800. The GPM may be ordered through the GPO web site at http://www.gpo.gov.
C. Reporting Requirements
For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the PI must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period.
Within 90 days after the expiration of an award, the PI also is required to submit a final project report. Approximately 30 days before expiration, NSF will send a notice to remind the PI of the requirement to file the final project report. Failure to provide final technical reports delays NSF review and processing of pending proposals for that PI. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data.
NSF has implemented an electronic project reporting system, available through FastLane. This system permits electronic submission and updating of project reports, including information on: project participants (individual and organizational); activities and findings; publications; and other specific products and contributions. PIs will not be required to re-enter information previously provided, either with a proposal or in earlier updates using the electronic system.
General inquiries should be made to the International Research Fellowship Program, Susan Parris, Division of International Programs, Room 935, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230, telephone (703)292-7225, email:firstname.lastname@example.org.
For questions related to the use of FastLane, contact the INT Administrative Officer, telephone: (703) 292-8708, e-mail:email@example.com or the FastLane Help Desk, telephone: (800) 673-6188, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
IX. OTHER PROGRAMS OF INTEREST
The NSF Guide to Programs is a compilation of funding for research and education in science, mathematics, and engineering. The NSF Guide to Programs is available electronically at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gp. General descriptions of NSF programs, research areas, and eligibility information for proposal submission are provided in each chapter.
Many NSF programs offer announcements or solicitations concerning specific proposal requirements. To obtain additional information about these requirements, contact the appropriate NSF program offices. Any changes in NSF's fiscal year programs occurring after press time for the Guide to Programs will be announced in the NSF E-Bulletin, which is updated daily on the NSF web site at http://www.nsf.gov/home/ebulletin, and in individual program announcements/solicitations. Subscribers can also sign up for NSF's Custom News Service (http://www.nsf.gov/home/cns/start.htm) to be notified of new funding opportunities that become available.
The National Science Foundation (NSF) funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. Awardees are wholly responsible for conducting their project activities and preparing the results for publication. Thus, the Foundation does not assume responsibility for such findings or their interpretation.
NSF welcomes proposals from all qualified scientists, engineers and educators. The Foundation strongly encourages women, minorities and persons with disabilities to compete fully in its programs. In accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and NSF policies, no person on grounds of race, color, age, sex, national origin or disability shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving financial assistance from NSF (unless otherwise specified in the eligibility requirements for a particular program).
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities (investigators and other staff, including student research assistants) to work on NSF-supported projects. See the program announcement/solicitation.
The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation about NSF programs, employment or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 292-5090, FIRS at 1-800-877-8339.
The National Science Foundation is committed to making all of the information we publish easy to understand. If you have a suggestion about how to improve the clarity of this document or other NSF-published materials, please contact us at email@example.com.
The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review process; to applicant institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies needing information as part of the review process or in order to coordinate programs; and to another Federal agency, court or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.
Pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(b), an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to an information collection unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding this burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, Facilities and Operations, Division of Administrative Services, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230, or to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for National Science Foundation (3145-0058), 725 17th Street, N.W. Room 10235, Washington, D.C. 20503.
OMB clearance number: OMB 3145-0058.
Yes, if you are a U.S. citizen or permanent resident within six years of your Ph.D. You do not have to have your degree to apply, but if you are recommended for an award, you must prove you have obtained the degree to receive funds.
The deadline is October 22, 2001 (In future years, October 1, annually). All applications must be sent electronically by 5 pm local time, October 22, 2001 (In future years, October 1, annually).
All countries are included in this program. Applications may be for research in any country in the world , although travel restrictions by the State Department to certain countries, such as Cuba, may impose an additional level of review.
Competition is very strong for applicants who want to travel to Western Europe and, in general, to the more developed countries. All proposals are ranked based on scientific merit. However, given two equally ranked proposals, priority will be given to the proposal with an underrepresented country in the program. In addition, for heavily subscribed countries, we may limit the number of awards for that country in the interest of widening the geographical scope of the program. If you are confident that your project and qualifications are strong, do not let country considerations deter you from applying.
You may. If you have a project that involves several hosts and countries, make sure that it is very clear on what will be done where and when. If you want to apply to two different countries merely to increase your chances of receiving an award, we would caution you against it. In the past, our panelists have looked negatively on that practice.
An average award is about $60,000, but the elements are so varied that it is difficult to say. The size of an award depends on how expensive airfare is to each location, if the applicant is alone or with his/her family, if the project requires materials or equipment, and how long the project will take.
Applicants who have had previous international experience or other postdoctoral awards may be at a SLIGHT disadvantage because priority may be given to applicants without previous international experience or funding in the event of two equally merit-ranked proposals.
No. Please do not submit applications before October 1 (September 15 in future years).
The living allowance (stipend) is computed using a formula based on the existing U.S. government per diem rate for the locale you are visiting. The per diem rate information, regularly updated by the Department of State, may be useful to you in planning your visit (http://www.state.gov/www/perdiems/index.html). The rate is calculated at the full per diem rate for the first 30 days; and 50 percent of that rate for the remaining time, but cannot exceed $4,500 per month. You may also consult with your host to determine a fair allotment. It will not be held against you to ask for the maximum rate.
We suggest April 1 as the earliest starting date. If an earlier start date is required, please consult the IRFP Program Manager. Decisions are announced in March, but it takes time to process the paperwork. We make every effort to get awards processed quickly, but there are many variables that cannot be controlled.
From the point of view of the IRFP program, we have no objections for you to do so. Please be aware, however, that other postdoctoral programs have limitations on multiple applications and it is recommended that you consult with them. The Foundation does not encourage submission of duplicate applications to different programs, but you may apply to different programs with different projects. Keep in mind, that if you are recommended for support by more than one postdoctoral program, you may have to chose one or the other.
The success rate for proposals in this program is about 30 percent. The number of applications in the past has ranged from 74 to 130 each year.
Generally, fields in the areas of the basic sciences and engineering are eligible for support by this program. NSF does not support research in the clinical-medical or disease related fields and, therefore, proposals in those fields are not eligible for support. If in doubt, please call the IRFP program manager.
No counterpart proposal is required by the host. The only requirement on their part is to send a letter of invitation and their cv (limited to 2 pages, in English). Their letter of invitation should describe the proposed interaction between your research and the ongoing research efforts at the foreign site. The reviewer will want to see evidence of the proposed collaboration.
No, we will allow up to three additional pages for those as Supplemental Docs.
It should be the person you will collaborate with. The review process takes into account the contribution that your host may make to the collaboration.
In addition to the criteria described in announcement Section VI.A, NSF Proposal Review Process, past reviewers have been most influenced by strong publication records, enthusiastic reference letters, and clear and well written proposals. It also helps if your host provides as much detail as possible about what part they will have in your research collaboration.
Because your proposal will be read by reviewers from all fields represented by the competition, your proposal should be clearly written and understandable by both those within your specific field and those outside it. As this program includes all countries and all fields supported by NSF, besides technical merit, the program must consider geographic and field distribution in the final ranking. In addition, the program is interested in supporting fellowships for those who will most benefit at this stage in their career.