Historically Black Colleges and Universities Undergraduate Program (HBCU-UP)
Program Solicitation
|
National Science Foundation |
||
Letter of Intent Due Date(s) (optional):
January 30, 2006
Implementation Projects, Planning Grants, Targeted Infusion Projects and Education Research Projects
May 01, 2006
Targeted Infusion Projects (second competition)
Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):
February 28, 2006
Implementation Projets, Planning Grants, Targeted Infusion Projects and Education Research Projects
June 05, 2006
Targeted Infusion Projects (second competition)
Program Title:
Historically Black Colleges and Universities Undergraduate Program (HBCU-UP)
Synopsis of Program:
This program provides awards to build the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and research capacity at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) as a means to broaden participation in the Nation's STEM workforce. Support is available for Implementation Projects, Planning Grants, Education Research Projects, and Targeted Infusion Projects.
Implementation Projects provide support to implement a comprehensive institutional project to strengthen STEM education and research. Proposed activities and strategies should be the result of an institutional STEM self-analysis, address institutional and NSF goals, and have the potential to result in significant and sustainable improvements in STEM program offerings. Typical project implementation strategies include: curriculum enhancement, faculty professional development, undergraduate research, academic enrichment, infusion of technology to enhance STEM instruction, collaborations with research institutions and industry, and other activities that meet institutional needs.
Planning Grants provide support to an institution in order to undertake an institutional STEM self-analysis and to identify activities and strategies for an Implementation Project. Typical activities include data collection and research of potential activities and strategies.
Education Research Projects provide support to undertake a three-year education research project which is relevant to the HBCU community and has the potential to strengthen the STEM education and research programs at HBCUs. Potential research topics include: retention, diffusion of innovations, curricula enhancements, technology in education, and the identification of successful models.
Targeted Infusion Projects provide support to implement activities that will result in the achievement of a well defined goal within one STEM department over one to two years. Potential goals include: specialized accreditation, establishing new programs or certifications, and updating programs to reflect advances in the field and industry standards.
Cognizant Program Officer(s):
Jessie A. DeAro, Associate Program Director, Directorate for Education & Human Resources, Division of Human Resource Development, 815 N, telephone: (703) 292-5350, fax: (703) 292-9018, email: jdearo@nsf.gov
Camille McKayle, Program Director, Directorate for Education & Human Resources, Division of Human Resource Development, 815 N, telephone: (703) 292-4671, fax: (703) 292-9018, email: cmckayle@nsf.gov
Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s):
The Historically Black Colleges and Universities Undergraduate Program (HBCU-UP) is committed to increasing the quality of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and research at HBCUs. HBCU-UP recognizes and supports the important role that HBCUs play in increasing the numbers of underrepresented ethnic minorities that are well prepared for participation and leadership at every level of education and research in STEM.
HBCU-UP is one of the National Science Foundation’s programs designed to make progress toward the Foundation’s People Goal; “A diverse, competitive and globally engaged U.S. workforce of scientists, engineers, technologists and well prepared citizens.” HBCU-UP is managed by the Division of Human Resource Development (HRD), located in the Directorate for Education and Human Resources. For Fiscal Year (FY) 2006, HBCU-UP will support awards for Implementation Projects, Planning Grants, Education Research Projects, and Targeted Infusion Projects.
NSF expects that the activities and strategies included in Implementation Project proposals will be designed specifically to address the HBCU’s institutional STEM needs, long-term goals, and mission. Therefore NSF allows maximum flexibility in the design of Implementation Projects under HBCU-UP. The activities should be designed to produce significant improvements in undergraduate STEM education and research programs that have the potential to become sustainable by the end of the five years. HBCUs that do not have STEM research activities (4-year comprehensive and 2-year colleges) are particularly encouraged to submit proposals focusing on enhancing their STEM education programs. Institutions that have not already identified these activities and strategies in a planning process are encouraged to consider applying for a Planning Grant to perform an institutional STEM self-analysis before submitting an Implementation Project proposal.
If an institution has previously received an HBCU-UP Implementation Project grant, it is critical that the proposal provide complete information on the outcomes of that HBCU-UP project. Include a description of how successful activities are being sustained by the institution and what was learned from any unsuccessful activities. Second HBCU-UP awards must not simply continue previous HBCU-UP activities. The activities in the new proposal should be based an a thorough evaluation of the previous HBCU-UP project and move the institution to the next level of STEM program quality.
Competitive HBCU-UP implementation proposals will:
- Support new STEM activities or enhancements - not support existing activities.
- Coordinate all institutional STEM strengthening activities (new and existing) in order to create a comprehensive STEM program that will result in significant and sustainable improvements.
- Raise the quality of STEM education and student learning, including increasing opportunities for quality student and faculty research experiences when appropriate.
- Establish and develop partnerships with other minority-serving institutions, other institutions of higher education, industrial laboratories, national laboratories, and other research centers to enhance and support HBCU-UP activities.
Project Scope: The scope will depend on the size and number of STEM programs and the complexity of the current and proposed project activities - ideally all STEM programs and STEM students and faculty would be affected by the HBCU-UP activities. The scope of the project should be clearly defined numerically, outlining the impact on students and faculty of the proposed HBCU-UP activities. If the proposed scope will be limited the reasons should be clearly outlined.
Activities may include, but are not limited to:
Course and curriculum development, revision, and enhancement:
- Revise STEM gate-keeping and bottleneck courses
- Develop, adapt, and/or implement new instructional materials
- Develop and introduce new STEM program offerings
- Incorporate advances in science and engineering knowledge into courses and laboratories
- Implement research-based teaching and learning techniques and practices
- Integrate technology into STEM curricula and instruction
- Integrate student research and other active-learning opportunities into the STEM curriculum
- Enhance STEM equipment available for undergraduate education
Undergraduate student support services, academic success, and educational enrichment:
- Coordinate and support research opportunities for undergraduate students on-campus or off-site including international research opportunities
- Coordinate and support internships or cooperative education opportunities
- Provide undergraduate STEM scholarships and awards
- Develop and enhance tutoring services and mentoring programs
- Enhance student access to computer labs and STEM scientific equipment
- Provide travel for students for professional development
- Develop and enhance advising, counseling, and career services
- Address critical transition points such as the transition between high school and college, between two- and four-year colleges, from undergraduate to graduate studies, and from college to the workplace
- Provide graduate school planning and preparation – test taking courses, application preparation, curriculum vitae development, funding opportunities and financial aid information
NOTES: Student financial support may only be provided to students who are United States citizens, nationals, or permanent residents of the United States. Graduate student research is not supported under the HBCU-UP program.
Faculty professional development:
- Develop and enhance professional development opportunities - pedagogy training, mentoring training, using technology in classrooms, innovative teaching practices, grant writing skills, and student assessment techniques
- Build the institution's on-site research capacity (for example start up funds and other strategies to support faculty in the acquisition of preliminary data in order to pursue additional research funding)
- Coordinate and support research opportunities for faculty on-site or off-site including international research opportunities
- Establish partnerships and collaborations in order to expand the research capacity of the institution
- Provide faculty release time to participate in other HBCU-UP activities
- Support sabbaticals and faculty exchange programs
- Bring visiting faculty and industry practitioners to the campus to teach and do research
- Coordinate and provide STEM disciplinary and topical seminars
The proposed activities should include an institutional STEM self-analysis and the development of an action plan with activities and strategies to enhance the institution’s STEM programs. The activities should result in the institution's submission of a strong Implementation Project proposal to the HBCU-UP program.
Activities may include, but are not limited to:
- Faculty release time to manage and participate in planning activities
- Visiting faculty or consultants involved in the planning process
- Consultation of stakeholders (for example students, faculty, administrators, as well as industry and K-12 representatives)
- Data collection
- STEM Program assessment and evaluation
- Computer services
- Research on effective STEM strengthening strategies
- Travel for site visits to exemplar institutions including existing HBCU-UP project sites
- Professional travel and professional development related to improving the planning activities
We encourage proposals for research that can serve as a basis for strengthening the STEM programs of HBCUs. Research proposals that are linked to ongoing HBCU-UP Implementation Projects are strongly encouraged. Successful proposals will demonstrate expertise in education research and/or social science research methods as well as knowledge about STEM programs at HBCUs. Proposers are encouraged to establish collaborations to strengthen the research proposal. The proposal should describe the nature of the collaboration and the anticipated effects of the collaboration. The proposal should include letters of support from collaborators which outline the role and value of the collaboration. Potential research topics include the following:
- Factors contributing to enhanced retention of students, completion of their degrees, and successful placement in STEM careers, particularly for students from groups underrepresented in STEM fields, including women and persons with disabilities
- Identification of successful education models in various STEM fields, definitions of what constitutes successful outcomes, and the factors associated with these outcomes
- Strategies for strengthening the capacity of HBCUs to provide academically excellent STEM undergraduate programs
- Mechanisms to redesign STEM education in response to changes in traditional disciplines, efforts to enhance curricula and learning, and the incorporation of STEM research into teaching
- Impacts of and partnerships with industry, K-12 schools, and informal education settings
- Investigations of the causes, consequences, and performance of STEM-oriented intervention programs or public policies
Proposals should discuss how the work would contribute to productive public or scholarly debate. As appropriate, proposals should describe mechanisms to effectively and efficiently transfer findings into educational practice. Requests for the preparation of critical literature reviews, workshops to develop new research networks and collaborations, and other forums to communicate results among constituencies are appropriate. In addition, proposals that focus on the potential utility of research and evaluation findings and their transfer into practice or use by other researchers and policymakers are encouraged.
Proposals should reflect relevant advances in quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research and evaluation methodologies and provide a compelling argument about how the methodologies proposed are appropriately matched with strategic research questions. Additionally, proposal should demonstrate how the methods chosen would result in rigorous, cumulative, reproducible, and usable findings.
Proposers are encouraged to review the Research on Learning and Education (ROLE) program solicitation (http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsf05529/nsf05529.htm) for more discussion of education research and evaluation as well as useful references. In addition, proposers are encouraged to contact the ROLE program officer listed in the Contacts for Additional Information section of this solicitation to discuss potential research questions and research methodologies. For general questions and proposal process questions please contact one of the Cognizant Program Officers listed at the beginning of this solicitation.
Project activities must be extremely focused in order to meet a very well defined short term goal to build the education and research capacity of one STEM department. Potential goals include; new specialized accreditation, establishing a new STEM program or certification, building on-site research infrastructure, or revamping a STEM program to meet discipline and industry standards. Projects aligned with the NSF priority areas (http://www.nsf.gov/news/priority_areas/) and interdisciplinary projects are highly encouraged.
Competitive projects will clearly outline how the activities will result in an overall enhancement of the current STEM department. Appropriate short term goals are easily measurable and attainable within the project time frame. Activities could include but are not limited to; curriculum enhancement, travel, training, new course development, and equipment acquisitions. The activities must clearly lead to the specific short term goal of the project. Proposals that include normal operating activities will not be competitive. HBCUs that currently have a five-year Implementation Project will need to explain how the Targeted Infusion Project is unique from the Implementation Project activities.
Proposers are encouraged to contact the discipline appropriate program director listed in the Contacts for Additional Information section of this solicitation to discuss proposed project activities and goals of a potential Targeted Infusion Project. For general questions and proposal process questions please contact one of the Cognizant Program Officers listed at the beginning of this solicitation.
Eligible Institutions:
Historically Black Colleges and Universities that are accredited and that currently offer associate or baccalaureate degrees in the sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields.
Limit on the Number of Proposals:
PI Eligibility Limit:
- Number of awards: Approximately 6 in FY 2006
- Average Award: $1 to $2.5 million ($200,000 to $500,000 per year)
- Project Length: Up to five years
- Cost Share Requirement: None
- Restrictions: Equipment costs may not exceed 30% of the total budget request
- Grant Administration: Implementation projects will be managed by NSF as continuing grants
- Number of awards: Approximately 2 in FY 2006
- Average Award: Up to $50,000
- Project Length: Twelve to eighteen months
- Cost Share Requirement: None
- Restrictions: Equipment costs are not normally allowed under planning grants
- Grant Administration: Planning grant will be managed by NSF as standard grants
- Number of awards: Approximately 3 in FY 2006
- Average Award: $750,000 to $1,050,000 ($250,000 to $350,000 per year)
- Project Length: Three years
- Cost Share Requirement: None
- Restrictions: Equipment costs are not normally allowed under Education Research Projects
- Grant Administration: Education Research Projects will be managed by NSF as continuing grants
- Number of awards: Approximately 5 in FY 2006 (across the two competitions)
- Average Award: $75,000 to $150,000
- Project Length: Up to two years
- Cost Share Requirement: None
- Restrictions: There are no equipment cost restrictions
- Grant Administration: Targeted Infusion Projects will be managed by NSF as standard grants
Letters of Intent (optional):
All letters of intent must be submitted via FastLane. A separate letter of intent is requested for each type of HBCU-UP proposal (Implementation Project, Planning Grant, Targeted Infusion Project, or Education Research Project) that will be submitted from an eligible institution.
Letters of intent must contain the following information:
Full Proposal Instructions:
Proposals submitted in response to this program announcement/solicitation should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (GPG). The complete text of the GPG is available electronically on the NSF Website at: http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=gpg. Paper copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from pubs@nsf.gov.
The GPG provides general instructions for each section required in the full proposal. Additional program specific guidance is provided below.
Background and context
- Provide information on the institution's current STEM capability including a description of STEM programs, student enrollment and performance, faculty, and STEM resources at the institution and partner organizations.
- Baseline Data: Include baseline data describing the current state of your STEM programs. Competitive proposals will provide the key information that will allow the reviewers to determine the scope and impact of the proposed project in terms of the numbers of students and faculty that will be involved in each activity.
- Proposers are highly encouraged to review the Self Evaluation Indicator System (SEIS), which is part of the reporting requirements for HBCU-UP awardees, as a guide for the types of data that should be included. You can download a copy of the SEIS questions at http://www.systemic.com/pdfs/Sample_Cohort_6_SEIS05.pdf.
- For institutions that have previously received an HBCU-UP implementation award, competitive proposals for a second award will also answer the following questions concerning the first HBCU-UP project (these questions could be answered in a table):
- What were the objectives and goals of the project (numerical when possible)?
- What activities were implemented?
- What were the results of the activities (numerical when possible)?
- Have the activities been institutionalized? If not, why not?
- For institutions that have received an HBCU-UP planning grant, competitive proposals will provide a description of the results of the planning grant activities.
- Describe the relationship between the HBCU-UP project goals and objectives and the institution’s long-term STEM goals and mission.
- Provide evidence of the commitment of the institution administration (and partners if applicable) as well as the STEM faculty and leadership to improve undergraduate STEM education at the HBCU.
Proposed activities
Describe the proposed activities that will be implemented. Competitive proposals will provide answers to following questions for each proposed activity:
Project Management and Evaluation
Provide a management plan and timeline for the project that will ensure that the activities will be implemented on time, within budget, and the required reporting will be accurately completed and submitted. Include your plans for collecting and submitting Self Evaluation Indicator System (SEIS) data annually and at the end of the project.
Background and context
- Provide information on the institution's current STEM capability including a description of STEM programs, student enrollment and performance, faculty, and STEM resources at the institution and partner organizations.
- Baseline Data: Include baseline data describing the current state of your STEM programs. Competitive proposals will provide the key information that will allow the reviewers to determine the scope and impact of a potential implementation project in terms of the numbers of students and faculty that will be involved in each potential activity.
- Proposers are highly encouraged to review the Self Evaluation Indicator System (SEIS), which is part of the reporting requirements for HBCU-UP awardees, as a guide for the types of data that should be included. You can download a copy of the SEIS questions at http://www.systemic.com/pdfs/Sample_Cohort_6_SEIS05.pdf.
- Describe the relationship between the HBCU-UP planning grant objectives and the institution’s long-term STEM goals and mission.
- Provide evidence of the commitment of the institution administration (and partners if applicable) as well as the STEM faculty and leadership to improve undergraduate STEM education at the HBCU.
Proposed activities
Describe the activities to be supported by the planning grant.
Project Management and Evaluation
Provide a management plan and timeline for the project that will ensure that the activities will be implemented on time, within budget, and the required reporting will be accurately completed and submitted.
Background and context
- Describe the research questions to be addressed.
- Provide the theoretical basis for the proposed research methods and strategies.
- Explain how the research will contribute to the knowledge base of STEM education research and improve the STEM education and research programs at HBCUs.
Proposed activities
- Describe the activities that will be undertaken.
- Provide a timeline for the activities to be implemented - include measurable objectives and outcomes.
- Describe how the project results will be disseminated to the education research and HBCU communities.
Project Management and Evaluation
- Provide a management plan for the project that will ensure that the activities and the required reporting will be implemented on time and within budget.
- Provide an evaluation and assessment plan of the project.
Background and context
- Describe the overall goal of the project. The goal must be clearly stated, measurable, and achievable within the proposed time line.
- Describe the benefits of achieving the goal to the STEM education and research enterprise at the institution.
- How does achieving the goal fit into the institution's overall mission or strategic plan.
- Baseline data should be included in order to provide context for the impact of the Targeted Infusion Project.
Proposed activities
- Describe the activities that will be undertaken in order to achieve the goal. Proposals that include normal operating activities will not be competitive.
- Provide a timeline for the activities to be implemented - include measurable objectives and outcomes.
- If appropriate, you should include evidence (such as letters of support or minutes from governance committees) that indicate that institutionally required procedures have been followed and preliminary approvals have been secured.
Project Management and Evaluation
- Provide a management plan for the project that will ensure that the activities and the required reporting will be implemented on time and within budget.
- Evaluation and assessment:
- Referring to the objectives and goals already presented with your proposed activities, describe the specific project evaluation methods that will evaluate the project's success in achieving those objectives and goals.
Proposers are reminded to identify the program announcement/solicitation number (06-508) in the program announcement/solicitation block on the proposal Cover Sheet. Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay processing.
Cost Sharing:
Cost sharing is not required by NSF in proposals submitted under this Program Solicitation.
Other Budgetary Limitations:
Proposals must be submitted by the following date(s):
Letters of Intent
(optional):
Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):
Proposers are required to prepare and submit all proposals for this announcement/solicitation through the FastLane system. Detailed instructions for proposal preparation and submission via FastLane are available at: https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm. For FastLane user support, call the FastLane Help Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail fastlane@nsf.gov. The FastLane Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the use of the FastLane system. Specific questions related to this program announcement/solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this announcement/solicitation.
Submission of Electronically Signed Cover Sheets. The Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must electronically sign the proposal Cover Sheet to submit the required proposal certifications (see Chapter II, Section C of the Grant Proposal Guide for a listing of the certifications). The AOR must provide the required electronic certifications within five working days following the electronic submission of the proposal. Proposers are no longer required to provide a paper copy of the signed Proposal Cover Sheet to NSF. Further instructions regarding this process are available on the FastLane Website at: http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov
Reviews of proposals submitted to NSF are solicited from peers with expertise in the substantive area of the proposed research or education project. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight of the review process. NSF invites the proposer to suggest, at the time of submission, the names of appropriate or inappropriate reviewers. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts with the proposer. Special efforts are made to recruit reviewers from non-academic institutions, minority-serving institutions, or adjacent disciplines to that principally addressed in the proposal.
The National Science Board approved revised criteria for evaluating proposals at its meeting on March 28, 1997 (NSB 97-72). All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two merit review criteria. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities.
On July 8, 2002, the NSF Director issued Important Notice 127, Implementation of new Grant Proposal Guide Requirements Related to the Broader Impacts Criterion. This Important Notice reinforces the importance of addressing both criteria in the preparation and review of all proposals submitted to NSF. NSF continues to strengthen its internal processes to ensure that both of the merit review criteria are addressed when making funding decisions.
In an effort to increase compliance with these requirements, the January 2002 issuance of the GPG incorporated revised proposal preparation guidelines relating to the development of the Project Summary and Project Description. Chapter II of the GPG specifies that Principal Investigators (PIs) must address both merit review criteria in separate statements within the one-page Project Summary. This chapter also reiterates that broader impacts resulting from the proposed project must be addressed in the Project Description and described as an integral part of the narrative.
Effective October 1, 2002, NSF will return without review proposals that do not separately address both merit review criteria within the Project Summary. It is believed that these changes to NSF proposal preparation and processing guidelines will more clearly articulate the importance of broader impacts to NSF-funded projects.
The two National Science Board approved merit review criteria are listed below (see the Grant Proposal Guide Chapter III.A for further information). The criteria include considerations that help define them. These considerations are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. While proposers must address both merit review criteria, reviewers will be asked to address only those considerations that are relevant to the proposal being considered and for which he/she is qualified to make judgments.
NSF staff will give careful consideration to the following in making funding decisions:
All proposals are carefully reviewed by at least three other persons outside NSF who are experts in the particular field represented by the proposal. Proposals submitted in response to this announcement/solicitation will be reviewed by Panel Review.
Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support or decline each proposal. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.
A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and submitted by each reviewer. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers, are sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Director. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding.
NSF is striving to be able to tell proposers whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months. The time interval begins on the closing date of an announcement/solicitation, or the date of proposal receipt, whichever is later. The interval ends when the Division Director accepts the Program Officer's recommendation.
In all cases, after programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications and the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their own risk.
Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Program Division administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal Investigator. (See section VI.A. for additional information on the review process.)
An NSF award consists of: (1) the award letter, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award letter; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (NSF-GC-1); * or Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) Terms and Conditions * and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award letter. Cooperative agreement awards are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Financial and Administrative Terms and Conditions (CA-FATC). Electronic mail notification is the preferred way to transmit NSF awards to organizations that have electronic mail capabilities and have requested such notification from the Division of Grants and Agreements.
*These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at http://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/. Paper copies of these documents may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from pubs@nsf.gov.
More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions is contained in the NSF Grant Policy Manual (GPM) Chapter II, available electronically on the NSF Website at http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=gpm. The GPM is also for sale through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402. The telephone number at GPO for subscription information is (202) 512-1800. The GPM may be ordered through the GPO Website at http://www.gpo.gov.
Special Award Conditions:
Reverse Site Visits: Participation in a Reverse Site Visit (RSV) can be requested by NSF at anytime during the grant period. The RSV is a presentation on the outcomes and progress of the grant activities at NSF in front of a peer review panel. Participation in the RSV is required by the appropriate grant management and administration.
Site Visits: NSF staff may visit the site of the grant project at anytime during the grant period. Reasonable accommodation of the site visit by NSF program staff is required by the grantee.
Cooperation with NSF evaluation projects and special projects: NSF, an NSF contractor, or a grantee on behalf of NSF, may from time to time conduct program evaluations or special projects of HBCU-UP projects. These may occur at anytime during the grant period and sometimes after the grant period has ended. Reasonable cooperation with these efforts is required by the grantee.For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the PI must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period.
Within 90 days after the expiration of an award, the PI also is required to submit a final project report. Failure to provide final technical reports delays NSF review and processing of pending proposals for the PI and all Co-PIs. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data.
PIs are required to use NSF's electronic project reporting system, available through FastLane, for preparation and submission of annual and final project reports. This system permits electronic submission and updating of project reports, including information on project participants (individual and organizational), activities and findings, publications, and other specific products and contributions. PIs will not be required to re-enter information previously provided, either with a proposal or in earlier updates using the electronic system.
General inquiries regarding this program should be made to:
Jessie A. DeAro, Associate Program Director, Directorate for Education & Human Resources, Division of Human Resource Development, 815 N, telephone: (703) 292-5350, fax: (703) 292-9018, email: jdearo@nsf.gov
Camille McKayle, Program Director, Directorate for Education & Human Resources, Division of Human Resource Development, 815 N, telephone: (703) 292-4671, fax: (703) 292-9018, email: cmckayle@nsf.gov
ROLE Program Contact:
Biological Sciences Contact:
Computer and Information Science and Engineering Contact:
Engineering Contact:
Geosciences Contact:
Mathematical and Physical Sciences Contact:
For questions related to the use of FastLane, contact:
Victoria A. Smoot, Directorate for Education & Human Resources, Division of Human Resource Development, 815 N, telephone: (703) 292-4677, fax: (703) 292-9018, email: vsmoot@nsf.gov
Gloria Strothers, Directorate for Education & Human Resources, Division of Human Resource Development, 815 N, telephone: (703) 292-4718, fax: (703) 292-9018, email: gstrothe@nsf.gov
The NSF Guide to Programs is a compilation of funding for research and education in science, mathematics, and engineering. The NSF Guide to Programs is available electronically at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gp. General descriptions of NSF programs, research areas, and eligibility information for proposal submission are provided in each chapter.
Many NSF programs offer announcements or solicitations concerning specific proposal requirements. To obtain additional information about these requirements, contact the appropriate NSF program offices. Any changes in NSF's fiscal year programs occurring after press time for the Guide to Programs will be announced in the NSF E-Bulletin, which is updated daily on the NSF Website at http://www.nsf.gov/home/ebulletin, and in individual program announcements/solicitations. Subscribers can also sign up for NSF's MyNSF News Service (http://www.nsf.gov/mynsf/) to be notified of new funding opportunities that become available.
The Historically Black Colleges and Universities Undergraduate Program is among a number of NSF programs that promote the involvement of underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics and foster innovation in education for all students. Related programs in the Division of Human Resource Development include the Tribal Colleges and Universities Program (TCUP), Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation (LSAMP), Centers of Research Excellence in Science and Technology (CREST), Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP), Research on Gender in Science and Engineering (GSE), and Research in Disabilities Education (RDE). The following programs might also be of interest:
Biological Studies (BIO) (http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/bio/biolist.pl)
Computer and Information Science and Engineering (http://www.cise.nsf.gov/)
Cross Directorate (http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/)
Education and Human Resources (EHR) (http://www.nsf.gov/home/ehr/)
Engineering (ENG) (http://www.eng.nsf.gov/eec/)
International Science and Engineering (INT) (http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/int/start.htm)
Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS) (http://www.nsf.gov/mps/start.htm)
The National Science Foundation (NSF) funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. Awardees are wholly responsible for conducting their project activities and preparing the results for publication. Thus, the Foundation does not assume responsibility for such findings or their interpretation.
NSF welcomes proposals from all qualified scientists, engineers and educators. The Foundation strongly encourages women, minorities and persons with disabilities to compete fully in its programs. In accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and NSF policies, no person on grounds of race, color, age, sex, national origin or disability shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving financial assistance from NSF, although some programs may have special requirements that limit eligibility.
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities (investigators and other staff, including student research assistants) to work on NSF-supported projects. See the GPG Chapter II, Section D.2 for instructions regarding preparation of these types of proposals.
|
The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Website at http://www.nsf.gov
|
The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review process; to applicant institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies needing information as part of the review process or in order to coordinate programs; and to another Federal agency, court or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to an information collection unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding this burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, Division of Administrative Services, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230.
OMB control number: 3145-0058.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
The National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230, USA |
|
|
|||||||||||||||