text-only page produced automatically by LIFT Text
Transcoder Skip all navigation and go to page contentSkip top navigation and go to directorate navigationSkip top navigation and go to page navigation
National Science Foundation HomeNational Science Foundation - Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences (SBE)
Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences
design element
SBE Home
About SBE
Funding Opportunities
Awards
News
Events
Discoveries
Publications
Advisory Committee
Career Opportunities
See Additional SBE Resources
View SBE Staff
SBE Organizations
SBE Office of Multidisciplinary Activities (SMA )
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSE)
Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences (BCS )
Division of Social and Economic Sciences (SES )
Proposals and Awards
Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide
  Introduction
Proposal Preparation and Submission
bullet Grant Proposal Guide
  bullet Grants.gov Application Guide
Award and Administration
bullet Award and Administration Guide
Award Conditions
Other Types of Proposals
Merit Review
NSF Outreach
Policy Office Website
Additional SBE Resources
Exploring What Makes Us Human
Rebuilding the Mosaic Report
Bringing People Into Focus: How Social, Behavioral & Economic Research Addresses National Challenges
"Youth Violence: What We Need to Know" Report to NSF
Social, Behavioral and Economic Research in the Federal Context Report
Expedited Review of Social and Behavioral Research Activities Report
SBE Advisory Committee Web Site (for members only)


SBE 2020: Submission Detail

ID Number: 11
Title: A Rationale for Funding Large Proof of Concept Proposals
Lead Author: Wright, Robert E.
Abstract: The NSF should leverage its excellent track record of sponsoring important, high quality, high value research by extending its SBE Directorate into a new realm, large proof of concept projects. Researchers sometimes develop ideas of tremendous potential value to society but most such transformative ideas cannot be proven with models, statistics, or other scholarly tools. Rather, they must be implemented in the real world on a fairly substantial scale before their quality can be assessed by policymakers or businesses. Unfortunately, many big think ideas never get tested in the real world due to a large gap between public and private research funding. Businesses rarely fund research that entails large expenditures and high degrees of uncertainty about rates of return. Governments, by contrast, often fund research with little or no clear commercial application. To date, however, they have not typically funded the large scale trial of innovative new policies or markets, though their competency and the rationale for them doing so is quite well established. Finally, the cost of not funding such potentially important projects is becoming increasingly clear.
PDF: Wright_Robert_11.pdf

SBE 2020 Home

 

Print this page
Back to Top of page