text-only page produced automatically by LIFT Text
Transcoder Skip all navigation and go to page contentSkip top navigation and go to directorate navigationSkip top navigation and go to page navigation
National Science Foundation HomeNational Science Foundation - Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences
Social & Economic Sciences (SES)
design element
SES Home
About SES
Funding Opportunities
Career Opportunities
Data Archiving Policy
Human Subjects Guidance
View SES Staff
SBE Organizations
Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences (BCS)
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES)
Social and Economic Sciences (SES)
SBE Office of Multidisciplinary Activities (SMA)
Proposals and Awards
Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide
Proposal Preparation and Submission
bullet Grant Proposal Guide
  bullet Grants.gov Application Guide
Award and Administration
bullet Award and Administration Guide
Award Conditions
Merit Review
NSF Outreach
Policy Office

Economics: Frequently Asked Questions about the Economics Program

What belongs in the project summary?

The project summary should be a single page. Summarize your proposal. Be sure to include the NSF-required explicit statement about the broader impact of your project.

What is the maximum length for my project description?

15 single-spaced pages. This page limit is strictly enforced. Tables, figures and appendices are included in the 15 page limit. If you want to include a sample of a questionnaire, experimental instructions, etc, we suggest that you post this material on a web site and refer to the URL in your project description.

What should I write in my project description?

The project description should be a detailed research design. It should clearly indicate the research question, the importance of the theoretical contribution of and motivation for the research, and the methodology that will be used to answer the question. The research design should be as specific as possible.

How are proposals reviewed?

Each proposal is sent to about 6 outside reviewers and is also evaluated by the Economics Advisory Panel. The members of the Advisory Panel represent all fields in Economics. Each proposal normally receives at least 3 written reviews.

Dissertation Improvement Proposals are reviewed by the Advisory Panel but are not sent for outside review.

What are NSF’s Evaluation Criteria?

NSF uses two broad criteria of scientific merit in the selection of research projects for funding. These two criteria are the intellectual merit and the broader impacts of the proposed activities.

Intellectual Merit is interpreted by the program as having three components:

  • Importance of the project in advancing conceptual understanding within economics or allied fields of social science.
  • Research competence, or the qualifications of the investigator to conduct the project, as shown by the quality of prior work.
  • Research design and methodology, or the ability of the specific activities described to actually advance our knowledge.

The Broader Impacts criterion refers to the project’s ability to benefit society at large. For Economics projects, the major broader impact is often better understanding of important public policy issues, and guidance for future policy decisions. Other broader impacts include enhancing scientific understanding through broad dissemination; promoting teaching, training and learning; broadening the participation of underrepresented groups; and enhancing the infrastructure for research and education.

What percentage of proposals is funded?

This varies from year to year. Over the last five years, between 20% - 30% of the proposals submitted in a round were funded.

What is the average size and duration of a funded project?

The average size is about $75,000 per year (including indirect costs). The typical duration is 3 years. PIs should request the amount of funding necessary to complete the project successfully. It usually helps to discuss specific budget questions with one of the program directors.

What is a target date?

For NSF, it is the date by which we expect to receive proposals for the current funding cycle. Proposals received after the target date will be reviewed, but the review will be delayed until the next review cycle unless the PI has received permission for a late submission from a program director before the target date.

What about dissertation funding?

The Economics Program also makes dissertation improvement awards. You will find more information about applying for these awards on the Economics Dissertation page.

I have a different question.

Please contact one of the Economics program directors via email or phone. We are happy to answer your questions.



Email this pagePrint this page
Back to Top of page