| SRS Home » NSF
Changes in Federal and Non-Federal Support for Academic R&D Over the Past Three Decades
Adequate financial support for research and development (R&D) activities at U.S. colleges and universities is essential. It enables academic scientists and engineers to conduct world-class research. The patterns of this support have been changing over the past several decades, as the various sources have shifted their financial backing both overall and of specific science and engineering (S&E) fields. Inflation-adjusted academic R&D spending rose by 240 percent between 1972 and 2000 (from $8.3 billion to $28.1 billion). Federal financing of academic R&D grew by 180 percent during this period (from $5.6 billion to $16.3 billion), and academic R&D funds from non-Federal sources increased almost 350 percent (from $2.6 billion to $11.7 billion). This InfoBrief compares the roles of the Federal Government and non-Federal sources in supporting overall academic R&D and academic R&D in specific S&E fields and examines how these roles have changed over the past three decades.
Major Funding Sources for Overall Academic R&D
The five academic R&D funding sources (for which data are available) are the Federal Government, state and local governments, industry, academic institutions, and other sources. Over the past three decades, the relative roles of these sources have changed considerably, with both the Federal and state and local governments playing a diminishing role, and industry and academic institutions increasing their share of support (figure 1).Figure 1 Source Data: Excel file
Although relative shares changed during the 19722000 period, the amount of academic R&D funds provided by each of the five major funding sources increased in constant dollars (table 1). During the overall 19722000 period and in each of the three decade periods (1970s, 1980s, and 1990s), funds from industry grew fastest, followed by those from institutional sources. Funds from state and local government sources grew slowest during the overall period and during both the 1970s and 1990s; in the 1980s, however, funds from the Federal Government grew slower than those from the other four sources.Table 1 Source Data: Excel file
Sources of Support by S&E Field
The relative shares of Federal and non-Federal funding of academic R&D vary by science and engineering field, as do the absolute levels of funding (table 2). In 2000, physical sciences; psychology; mathematics; computer sciences; biological sciences; earth, atmospheric, and ocean sciences; and medical sciences received between 60 and 70 percent of their support from the Federal Government. Engineering received 56 percent of its funds from the Federal Government; social sciences, 38 percent; and agricultural sciences, 27 percent (figure 2).Table 2 Source Data: Excel file
Figure 2 Source Data: Excel file
The Federal share fell over the entire 19732000 period for all of the fields examined, with most of the decline in all of these fields occurring during the 1980s (figure 3). During the 1973-1980 period, there were slight increases in the Federal share for some fields and decreases in others. In the 1990s, the Federal share rose for social sciences and psychology, declined for mathematics and medical sciences, and stayed roughly even for the remaining fields. The decline in the Federal share for medical sciences occurred during a period in which the R&D budget of the National Institutes of Health (the largest Federal source of academic R&D funds) was increasing much more rapidly than the R&D budgets of other Federal agencies; this indicates that non-Federal sources of medical science R&D at universities and colleges were increasing their funding faster than was the Federal Government.Figure 3 Source Data: Excel file
The most dramatic declines in Federal shares over the entire periodin both absolute and relative termsoccurred in social sciences (57 percent in 1973 versus 38 percent in 2000) and engineering (71 percent to 56 percent). The smallest decline was in computer sciences (70 to 66 percent).
In terms of actual (constant) dollars received by academic institutions, support from both Federal and non-Federal sources increased during the overall period for each one of the fields examined in this InfoBrief. Support from these sources also increased in each of the three decadal periods for almost all fields (table 2). In the social sciences, the level of Federal support fell in both the 1970s and 1980s and the level of non-Federal support declined in the 1970s. Federal support for psychology also decreased in that decade as well as non-Federal support for the biological sciences.
This InfoBrief was prepared by:
Alan I. Rapoport
For more information on the Survey of Research and Development Expenditures at Universities and Colleges, contact:
M. Marge Machen
 The analysis is based on statistics from the National Science Foundation's annual Survey of Research and Development Expenditures at Universities and Colleges. For a more detailed discussion of academic R&D, see chapter 5, "Academic Research and Development," in National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators2002, NSB-02-1 (Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2002).
 This category includes funds directly targeted to academic R&D activities by state and local governments. Excluded are general-purpose state or local government appropriations that academic institutions designate and use for separately budgeted research or to cover unreimbursed indirect costs or cost sharing.
 Institutional funds encompass three categories: separately budgeted funds from unrestricted sources that an academic institution spends on R&D, unreimbursed indirect costs associated with externally funded R&D projects, and mandatory and voluntary cost sharing on Federal and other grants. Institutional funds may be derived from (1) general-purpose state or local government appropriations (particularly for public institutions) or Federal appropriations; (2) general-purpose grants from industry, foundations, or other outside sources; (3) tuition and fees; (4) endowment income; and (5) unrestricted gifts. Other potential sources of institutional funds are income from patents or licenses and income from patient care revenues.
 This category of funds includes grants for R&D from nonprofit organizations and voluntary health agencies and gifts from private individuals that are restricted by the donor to the conduct of research, as well as other sources restricted to research purposes not included in the other categories.
 Data on funding source by S&E field for the four non-Federal sources discussed above are not available; instead, data are provided here for the combined non-Federal total. These data were unavailable before 1973.