The National Science Foundation Act of 1950, which President Truman signed into law on May 10 of that year, gave NSF the mandate "to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; and for other purposes." The breadth of this mandate indicates that a bipartisan majority existed in Congress about the significance of science and engineering in addressing matters of national importance. NSF's creation occurred near the end of the time of transition in which the basis of U.S. science policy was established and many of the principal issues and concerns comprised by that policy were articulated. But the concept of a National Science Foundation had emerged several years earlier. (See text table 1-1.)
More than a year before World War II ended on September 2, 1945, a few members of Congress and a handful of officials in the Roosevelt Administration had foreseen the essential roles that science and engineering would play during peacetime. Early in 1944, Senator Harley M. Kilgore (D-WV), a member of a Select Committee chaired by Senator Harry S Truman (D-MO) investigating the war production effort, introduced a bill to create a National Science Foundation (Kevles 1977). While Kilgore's National Science Foundation would have given priority to Federal Government laboratories in the disposition of funds, it would also have been authorized to award research contracts and scholarships to colleges and universities. Kilgore's colleagues in the Senate convinced him that hearings on his proposed bill should be postponed until after the end of the war.
In November 1944, President Franklin D. Roosevelt addressed a letter to Vannevar Bush, his de facto science advisor, asking for his advice on how the lessons learned from the World War II organization of science and engineering could be applied in peacetime. Bush's response came seven months later in July 1945, when he delivered the requested report, Science-The Endless Frontier, to President Truman (Bush 1945a). By the end of that month, Senator Warren Magnuson (D-WA) had introduced legislation to implement the centerpiece recommendation of what is commonly referred to as the Bush report: namely, to establish a National Research Foundation to provide Federal funds for research to nonprofit institutions outside of the Federal Government (including civilian defense research and medical research) and to award scholarships and fellowships to aspiring scientists and engineers. Within a few days, Senator Kilgore reintroduced a revised version of his earlier bill.
The Kilgore and Magnuson bills differed both in the types of institution given priority for research support and in their proposed administrative structure. Deep-seated disagreements on the latter issue persisted and delayed the creation of NSF for almost five years. Between 1945 and 1950, a vigorous public debate took place on the institutional framework for science. That debate, which included the nature of a National Science Foundation, took five years to resolve; during this period, both the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were created, reducing the scope of the proposed foundation.
Joint hearings on the Magnuson and Kilgore bills, which began in October 1945, were among the first in a series of congressional debates and administration actions whose outcomes determined the character of Federal Government support for, and involvement with, science and technology that has largely persisted for the past half-century. Congress, for the first time, began to deal with significant science- and technology-related issues on a more or less continual basis. Its extensive, open-to-the-public committee hearings called heavily on members of the public and the scientific community as it sought to forge new policies and create a new organizational framework for Federal Government science.
The most controversial issue addressed by Congress during the immediate postwar years had to do with whether the control of nuclear energy should remain with the military or be consigned to civilian hands (Smith 1965). On August 1, 1946, following extensive and frequently impassioned hearings that involved many of the younger scientists who had been engaged in the ultra-secret World War II work to produce nuclear weapons, Congress established the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), to be governed by a five-member commission of presidentially appointed civilians.
On August 1, 1946, Congress also created the ONR. Both AEC and ONR soon began to support university research in fields broadly related to their respective missions. Two years later, NIH within the Public Health Service began to follow suit by supporting research through contracts to the Nation's medical schools. Prior to that time, the agency's research program had focused on specific health-related problems and was carried out largely intramurally. Thus by the time NSF was created in May 1950, several Federal mission agencies had already gained considerable experience in funding university research.
On October 17, 1946, in response to the rapid expansion in the Federal Government's organization for science, President Truman established the President's Scientific Research Board (PSRB) chaired by John R. Steelman, who became The Assistant to the President on January 1, 1947. The first of five volumes of PSRB's report, entitled Science and Public Policy and commonly referred to as the Steelman report (Steelman 1947), was released on August 27, 1947. This report analyzed, and made recommendations about, the entire Federal science and technology system; the relations between research in the Federal Government, industrial, and academic sectors; and the condition of science teaching at all levels, from the primary grades through graduate school. It based its analysis of the state of the Nation's science and technology enterprise on extensive sets of data and several specially commissioned studies.
The President drew on the Steelman report to propose a national science policy in his September 1948 address to AAAS (Truman 1948). One element of his proposed policyto create a National Science Foundationwas fulfilled when Congress passed the National Science Foundation Act of 1950.
The Act that Truman signed into law in May 1950 defined NSF as "an independent agency. . .[to] consist of a National Science Board and a Director." Accordingly, the Foundation was officially activated when the Board convened for the first time on December 12, 1950, in the White House (England 1983, 123). President Truman joined the first NSB meeting and addressed the Board. Thereafter, the chairman reported to the President on actions taken by the Board during the morning session. Those actions consisted of the election of the chairman (James B. Conant) and vice chairman (Edwin B. Fred), establishment of a committee to recommend to the President names of people who might be appointed to the position of director of NSF, and establishment of an executive committee.
President Truman had a great deal on his mind at the time he addressed the NSB's first meeting. A month earlier, the People's Republic of China had intervened in the Korean War. On the day Truman met with the Board, United Nations' forces abandoned the North Korean capital of Pyongyang, which they had captured in September 1950, and within a few days abandoned Seoul, the South Korean capital, as well. There was justifiable concern that it might not be possible to confine the worsening military situation to Korea. By that time, the White House had already commissioned William T. Golden, a New York investment banker, to prepare a report on how the Nation's scientific resources might be mobilized to address any wider military emergency (Blanpied 1995, xiv--xliv). Whether or not such a wider emergency would occur, it was abundantly clear that both the Congress and the Administration would thenceforth accord a high priority to defense-related research and development (R&D).
Despite the Korean emergency, the NSB adopted a long-term view as it proceeded to work out the policy implications of NSF's charter and develop plans to implement its programmatic mission. At the conclusion of its third meeting on February 13--14, 1951, the Board issued a public statement that disavowed any direct NSF involvement with defense-related research, while reemphasizing that "the fundamental objective of the National Science Foundation is the promotion of basic research and education in the sciences throughout the country."
On December 18, 1950, less than a week after the first meeting of the NSB, Golden addressed a memorandum to the President recommending that he appoint a full-time science advisor to assist in mobilizing science for defense purposes and, additionally, provide high-level oversight of the entire Federal science organization. President Truman accepted the essence of this recommendation when, on April 19, 1951, he established the Scientific Advisory Committee to the White House Office of Defense Mobilization (SAC/ODM), a body that was destined to evolve into a full-scale presidential scientific advisory system.
With the creation of SAC/ODM, all principal elements of the U.S. Government's science structure were in place, including a protopresidential advisory and coordination system and the six agencies-or their predecessors-that have long accounted for more than 90 percent of Federal R&D expenditures. Most changes made in that structure during the next 50 years were designed to adapt it to the evolving political, economic, and social environment in which the U.S. science and technology enterprise functions and to the spectacular growth of the enterprise itself.
One important refinement in the Federal Government's organization for science and technology was the creation of the Defense Science Board (DSB), which was chartered to "canvass periodically the needs and opportunities presented by new scientific knowledge for radically new weapons systems." Initially, DSB, which met for the first time on September 20, 1956, was an advisory body to the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Research and Development). During the next few years, as the Defense Department was reorganized to reflect the increasing importance of science and technology to its mission, the status of DSB was elevated to that of an advisory body to the Secretary of Defense. DSB currently consists of 32 members who are appointed for terms ranging from one to four years and selected on the basis of their preeminence in the fields of science and technology and their applications to military operations, research, engineering, manufacturing, and acquisition processes. It also includes the chairs of seven advisory bodies to other Defense Department organizations as ex officio members.
From the outset, the NSB assumed responsibility to gather, analyze, and disseminate quantitative information on the condition of the U.S. science and engineering enterprise. The first National Science Foundation Annual Report, covering fiscal year (FY) 1951 (July 1, 1950, to June 30, 1951) and issued under the guidance of the Board, included data estimates from the Department of Defense Research and Development Board on R&D expenditures by the Federal Government and "other" sources, from 1940 through 1952, in addition to data on R&D performance by the industrial, Federal Government, and academic sectors over the same period. It also reproduced more detailed data from the Bureau of the Budget (BoB) on R&D expenditures by the principal Federal agencies from 1940 to 1950. NSF was not represented in the latter tabulation, since it had been created only during the final months of FY 1950, with a budget of $225,000 to defray administrative startup costs during its first year.
The Foundation's second annual report, covering the period from July 1, 1951, to June 30, 1952, extended the data on Federal R&D expenditures through FY 1952. (See text table 1-2.) NSF was included for the first time, Congress having appropriated an estimated $1.1 million for R&D expenditures from a total FY 1952 appropriation for NSF of $3.5 million. NSF's total budget for that year also included $1.53 million for graduate and post-doctoral fellowships. The remaining funds were allocated for administration, and for miscellaneous activities, including scientific translations.
Despite the fact that its R&D appropriation for FY 1952 was $1.1 million, compared with the total Federal R&D budget of more than $1.2 billion, NSF already occupied a unique position in the Federal system. It wasand remainsthe sole agency chartered to support research and education across all fields of science and engineering. In addition, Congress expected NSB, its policymaking body, to deal with issues transcending the Foundation's programmatic mission. Among other things, NSF (by law the National Science Board and Director) was "authorized and directed" to develop and encourage the pursuit of a national policy for the promotion of basic research and education in the sciences; . . .to foster the interchange of scientific information among scientists in the United States and foreign countries; and .. .to correlate the Foundation's scientific research programs with those undertaken by individuals and by public and private research groups."
The evolution of the Board's involvement in monitoring the state of science and engineering, culminating with the transmission of the first Indicators report (NSB 1973) to President Richard M. Nixon in 1973, is discussed in "Monitoring the Condition of the Science and Engineering Enterprise."