Chapter 2:

U.S. and International Research and Development: Funds and Alliances


Selected Bibliography


Albornoz, M. and E.F. Poluch. 1999. "Ibero-American Network of Science and Technology Indicators (RICYT)." Research Evaluation 8, No. 1: 2–14.

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1999a. Research and Development: FY 2000. Washington, DC: AAAS.

———. 1999b. AAAS Report XXIV: Research and Development FY 2000. Washington, DC: AAAS. Available at http://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/rd/xxiv/contents.htm.

Anderson, F. and F. Gault. 1999. "Developing indicators of the internationalization of R&D: The Case of Canada." Research Evaluation 8, No. 1: 15–22.

Arora, A. and A. Gambardella. 1999. "Chemicals." In Mowery, D., ed., U.S. Industry in 2000. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation and Pacific Economic Cooperation Council (APEC/PECC). 1997. APEC/PECC Pacific Science and Technology Profile. Fifth Issue.

Battelle Memorial Institute and State Science and Technology Institute (Battelle/SSTI). 1998. Survey of State Research and Development Expenditures: FY 1995. Columbus, OH: Battelle/SSTI.

Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy, National Research Council. 1999. Securing America’s Industrial Strength. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). 1998a. Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: Operations of U.S. Affiliates of Foreign Companies. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

———. 1998b. U.S. Direct Investment Abroad: Operations of U.S. Parent Companies and Their Foreign Affiliates. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Caracosta, P. and U. Muldur. 1998. Society, the Endless Frontier: A European Vision of Research and Innovation Policies for the 21st Century. Brussels: European Commission.

Centre for Science Research and Statistics (CSRS). 1999. Russian Science and Technology at a Glance: 1998. Moscow: CSRS.

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP). 1999. Evaluating Federal Research Programs: Research and the Government Performance and Results Act. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Council on Competitiveness. 1996. Endless Frontier, Limited Resources: U.S. R&D Policy for Competitiveness. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness.

———. 1998. The New Challenge to America’s Prosperity: Findings from the Innovation Index. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness.

Dalton, D.H. and M.G. Serapio, Jr. 1993. U.S. Research Facilities of Foreign Companies. NTIS PB93-134328. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.

Dalton, D.H., M.G. Serapio, Jr., and P.G. Yoshida. 1999. Globalizing Industrial Research and Development. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration.

Douglas, J. 1990. "Consortia for R&D Advantage." EPRI Journal (March): 4–15.

EUROSTAT. 1998. Research and Development: Annual Statistics 1998. Luxembourg: European Communities.

Fahim-Nader, M. and W.J. Zeile. 1998. "Foreign Direct Investment in the United States." Survey of Current Business June: 39–67.

General Accounting Office (GAO). 1997a. DOD’s Small Business Innovation Research Program. GAO/RCED-97-122. Washington, DC: GAO.

———. 1997b. Measuring Performance: Strengths and Limitations of Research Indicators. GAO/T-RCED-97-91. Washington, DC: GAO.

———. 1998. Federal Research: Observations on the Small Business Innovation Research Program. GAO/RCED-98-132. Washington, DC: GAO.

______. 1999. Federal Research: Information on International Science and Technology Agreements. GAO/RCED-99-108. Washington, DC: GAO.

Georghiou, L. 1998. "Global Cooperation in Research." Research Policy 27, No. 4: 611–26.

Gokhberg, L., M.J. Peck, and J. Gacs, eds. 1997. Russian Applied Research and Development: Its Problems and Its Promise. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Hagedoorn, J. 1990. "Organizational Modes of Inter-Firm Cooperation and Technology Transfer." Technovation 10, No.1: 17–30.

———. 1996. "Trends and Patterns in Strategic Technology Partnering Since the Early Seventies." Review of Industrial Organization 11, No. 5: 601–16.

Hagedoorn, J. and J.B. Sedaitis. 1998. "Partnerships in Transition Economies: International Strategic Technology Alliances in Russia." Research Policy 27, No. 2: 177–85.

Hazlett, J.A. and E.G. Carayannis. 1998. "Business-University Virtual Teaming for Strategic Planning." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 57: 261–65.

Industrial Research Institute (IRI). 1999. "Japanese Companies Keep Spending on R&D." Research Technology Management 42, No. 2: 6.

International Monetary Fund (IMF). 1998. International Financial Statistics Yearbook. Washington, DC: IMF.

International Science Policy Foundation (ISPF). 1993. Outlook on Science Policy 15, No. 1: 9–62.

Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. 1998. National Expenditures on Civilian Research and Development 1989-1997. Publication No. 1086. Jerusalem: Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.

Jankowski, J. 1998. "R&D: The Foundation for Innovation. . .Changes in U.S. Industry." In Trends in Industrial Innovation: Industry Perspectives and Policy Implications. Research Triangle Park, NC: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society.

———. 1999. "Trends in Academic Research Spending, Alliances, and Commercialization." Journal of Technology Transfer 24: 55–68.

Kuemmerle, W. 1997. "Building Effective R&D Capabilities Abroad." Harvard Business Review March-April: 61–70.

Larson, C.F. "Industrial R&D in 2008." Research Technology Management 41, No. 6: 19–24.

Lesko, J., and M. Irish, eds. 1995. Technology Exchange: A Guide to Successful Cooperative Research and Development Partnerships. Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial Institute.

Levitt, T. 1960. "Marketing Myopia." Harvard Business Review July-August: 45–57.

Link, A.N. 1996. "The Classification of Industrial R&D: Additional Findings." Report to National Science Foundation. Greensboro, NC: NSF.

———. 1999. "Federal Register Filing: The 1998 Update of the CORE Database." Report submitted to National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies, R&D Statistics Program. May 11.

Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT). 1999. Cooperative Agreements and Technology Indicators database. Maastricht, the Netherlands: MERIT.

Mataloni, R.J., Jr. 1998. "U.S. Multinational Companies Operations in 1996." Survey of Current Business September: 47–73.

Mataloni, R.J., Jr., and M. Fahim-Nader. 1996. "Operations of U.S. Multinational Companies: Preliminary Results From the 1994 Benchmark Survey." Survey of Current Business December: 11–37.

Mowery, D., ed. 1998a. U.S. Industry in 2000. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

———. 1998b. "The Changing Structure of the U.S. National Innovation System: Implications for International Conflict and Cooperation in R&D Policy." Research Policy 27: 639–54.

National Science Board (NSB). 1991. Science & Engineering Indicators—1991. NSB 91-1. Arlington VA: U.S. Government Printing Office.

———. 1996. Science & Engineering Indicators—1996. NSB 96-21. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

———. 1998. Science & Engineering Indicators—1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

National Science Foundation (NSF). 1993. Human Resources for Science & Technology: The Asian Region, by J. Johnson. NSF 93-303. Washington, DC: NSF.

———. 1995. Asia’s New High-Tech Competitors, by L. Rausch. NSF 95-309. Arlington, VA: NSF.

———. 1996. Human Resources for Science & Technology: The European Region, by J. Johnson. NSF 96-316. Arlington, VA: NSF.

———. 1997. "Japan Hopes to Double Its Government Spending on R&D." Issue Brief June 13. NSF 97-310. Arlington, VA: NSF

———. 1999a. Federal Funds for Research and Development: Fiscal Years 1997, 1998, and 1999. Detailed Statistical Tables. NSF 99-333. Arlington, VA: NSF.

———. 1999b. Federal R&D Funding by Budget Function: Fiscal Years 1998–2000. NSF 00-303. Arlington, VA: NSF.

———. 1999c. National Patterns of R&D Resources: 1998, by S. Payson. NSF 99-335. Arlington, VA: NSF.

———. 1999d. What is the State Government Role in the R&D Enterprise? by J. Jankowski. NSF 99-348. Arlington, VA: NSF.

———. 1999e. U.S. Corporate R&D. Volume II. Company Information on Top 500 Firms in R&D, by C. Shepherd and S. Payson. NSF 00-302. Arlington, VA: NSF.

Nelson, R. 1988. "Modelling the Connections in the Cross Section between Technical Progress and R&D Intensity." RAND Journal of Economics 19, No. 3: 478–85.

———. 1995. "Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change." Journal of Economic Literature 33, No. 1: 48–90.

Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 1997. "Promoting Research ." Budget of the United States Government: Fiscal Year 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

———. 1998. "Promoting Research." Budget of the United States Government: Fiscal Year 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

———. 1999. "Promoting Research." Budget of the United States Government: Fiscal Year 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1995. The Effectiveness of Research and Experimentation Tax Credits. OTA-8P-ITC-174. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1993. Megascience and Its Background. Paris: OECD.

———. 1994. The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Experimental Development (Frascati Manual). Paris: OECD.

———. 1996. Fiscal Measures to Promote R&D and Innovation. Paris: OECD.

———. 1998a. Internationalisation of Industrial R&D: Patterns and Trends. Paris: OECD.

———. 1998b. Science and Technology Main Indicators and Basic Statistics in the Russian Federation 1992–1997. Paris: OECD.

———. 1998c. "OECD Megascience Forum: Report of the Sub-Group on Access to Large-Scale Research Facilities." Submitted to the 13th meeting of Megascience Forum, Paris. June.

———. 1999a. The Knowledge-Based Economy: A Set of Facts and Figures. Meeting of the Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy at Ministerial Level. Paris: OECD.

———. 1999b. Research and Development in Industry: Expenditure and Researchers, Scientists and Engineers 1976–1997. Paris: OECD.

———. 1999c. Basic Science and Technology Statistics: 1998 (on diskette). Paris: OECD.

———. 1999d. Main Science and Technology Indicators Database. Paris: OECD.

Pavitt, K. 1984. "Sectoral Patterns of Technological Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory." Research Policy 13: 343–73.

Patel, P. and M. Vega. 1999. "Patterns of Internationalisation of Corporate Technology: Location vs. Home Country Advantages." Research Policy 28: 144–55.

Payson, S. 1997. "Product Evolution and the Classification of Business Interest in Scientific Advances." Knowledge and Policy 9, No. 4: 1996–97.

———. In press. Economics, Science and Technology. Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Porter, M.E. and S. Stern. 1999. Going Global: The Shape of American Innovation. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness.

Poterba, J., ed. 1997. Borderline Case: International Tax Policy, Corporate Research and Development, and Investment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Prabhu, G.N. 1997. "Joint Research and Development Projects as Technology Training Ventures." Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 9, No. 4: 453–72.

Quijano, A.M. 1990. "A Guide to BEA Statistics on Foreign Direct Investment in the United States." Survey of Current Business 70, No. 2: 29-37.

Radosevic, S. and L. Auriol. 1999. "Patterns of Restructuring in Research, Development and Innovation Activities in Central and Eastern European Countries: An Analysis Based on S&T Indicators." Research Policy 28: 351–76.

Red Iberomericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Iberomerican Network on Science & Technology Indicators) (RICYT). 1998. "Science & Technology Indicators 1997." Buenos Aires, Argentina: RICYT.

National Science Council. 1998. Indicators of Science and Technology Republic of China. Taipei.

Rogers, E.M., E.G. Carayannis, K. Kurihara, and M.M. Allbritton. 1998. "Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs) as Technology Transfer Mechanisms." R&D Management 28, No. 2: 79–88.

Small Business Administration (SBA). 1997. Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR): Annual Report. Washington, DC: Small Business Administration.

Small Business Administration (SBA). 1998. Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR): Annual Report. Washington, DC: Small Business Administration.

Smith, P.H. and J. Van Rosendale, eds. 1998. Data Visualization Corridors. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology.

State Science and Technology Institute (SSTI). 1997a. State Research and Development Tax Incentives. Columbus, OH: SSTI.

———. 1997b. State Science and Technology Strategic Planning: Creating Economic Opportunity. Columbus, OH: SSTI.

———. 1999a. Science Technology and the Governors: Excerpts from the 1999 Gubernatorial Addresses. Columbus, OH: SSTI.

______. 1999b. State and Federal Perspectives on the SBIR Program. Prepared for the U.S. Innovation Partnership SBIR Task Force. Westerville, OH: SSTI.

Tassey, G. 1999. R&D Trends in the U.S. Economy: Strategies and Policy Implications. U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology. April.

Tyler, B.B. and H.K. Steensma. 1995. "Evaluation Technological Collaborative Opportunities: A Cognitive Modelling Perspective." Strategic Management Journal 16: 43–70.

U.S. Congress, House Committee on Science. 1998. "Unlocking Our Future: Toward a New National Science Policy." September 24.

Utterback, J.M. 1979. "The Dynamics of Product and Process Innovation in Industry." In Hill, C.T., and J.M. Utterback, eds., Technological Innovation for a Dynamic Economy. New York: Pergamon Press.

Vonortas, N.S. 1997. Cooperation in Research and Development. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Wagner, C. 1997. International Cooperation in Research and Development: An Inventory of U.S. Government Spending and a Framework for Measuring Benefits. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Ward, M. 1985. Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures in the OECD. Paris: OECD.

Whang, K. 1998a. "Fixing the Research Credit." Issues in Science and Technology 15, No. 2: 71–74.

———. 1998b. "A Guide to the Research Tax Credit." Working Paper Series offered to Joint Economic Committee Minority.




Previous | Top | Next

Indicators 2000 Home | Contents
Help | Comments