Print this chapter (2.2MB)
Arrow KJ. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In Nelson R, editor. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton , NJ: Princeton University Press. pp 609–25.
Branscomb LM, Auerswald PE. 2002. Between Innovation and Innovation—An Analysis of Funding for Early-Stage Technology Development. GCR 02-841.Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology
Bush V. 1945. Science—The endless frontier. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office. http://www.nsf.gov/about/history/vbush1945.htm. Accessed April 2005.
Cassiman B, Veugelers R. 2002. Complementarity in the innovation strategy: Internal R&D, external technology acquisition, and cooperation in R&D. Research paper 457; Barcelona, Spain: University of Navarra, IESE. http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0457-E.pdf
Carson CS, Grimm BT, Moylan CE. 1994. A satellite account for research and development. Survey of Current Business November: 37–71, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, http://www.bea.gov/bea/pubs.htm.
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 2005. The World Fact Book 2004, http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html. Accessed 31 March 2005.
Commission of the European Communities (CEC), International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations, and World Bank. 1993. System of National Accounts 1993, Brussels/Luxembourg, New York, Paris, Washington, DC. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/sna1993/toctop.asp.
The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). 2004. Scattering the Seeds of Innovation: The Globalization of Research and Development. White paper. London. http://www.eiu.com/site_info.asp?info_name=eiu_scattering_seeds_of_invention. Accessed 21 June 2005.
European Round Table of Industrialists (ERT) 2002. Is the "3% R&D for 2010" objective unrealistic? Can the dramatic reappraisal it implies be achieved?". http://www.ert.be/pdf/R&D%20Paper.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2005.
Fraumeni BM, Okubo S. 2004. R&D in U.S. national accounts. Paper prepared by U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis for the 28th general conference of The International Association for Research in Income and Wealth; 22–28 August 2004; Cork, Ireland.
Hall B. 2001. Tax incentives for innovation in the United States. Report to European Union submitted by Asesoria Industrial ZABALA-Spain. Contract No: INNO–99–03. http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/bhhall/papers/BHH01%20EU%20Report%20USA%20rtax.pdf .
Narula R. 2003. Globalisation and Trends in International R&D Alliances. MERIT-Infonomics Research Memorandum 2003-001. The Netherlands: Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.
National Research Council.(NRC). 2005. Measuring Research and Development Expenditures in the U.S. Economy . Panel on Research and Development Statistics at the National Science Foundation, Lawrence D. Brown, Thomas J. Plewes, and Marisa A. Gerstein, Editors. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Board (NSB). 2004. U.S. and international research and development: Funds and alliances. Science and Engineering Indicators – 2004. Vol. I. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2002. Federal Science and Engineering Support to Universities, Colleges, and Nonprofit Institutions: Fiscal Year 2000. NSF 02–319. Arlington, VA. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf02319/.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2004a. U.S.-China R&D Linkages: Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Alliances in the 1990s . NSF 04-306. Arlington, VA. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf04306/start.htm.
National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2004b. Industrial R&D Employment in the United States and in U.S. Multinational Corporations. NSF 05-302. Arlington, VA. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf05302/start.htm.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2005. The U.S. Research and Experimentation Tax Credit in the 1990s (NSF 05-316). Arlington, VA. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf05316/
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2001. Measuring Capital: A Manual on the Measurement of Capital Stocks, Consumption of Fixed Capital and Capital Services. Paris . http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/57/1876369.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2005.
Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Iberomerican Network on Science & Technology Indicators) (RICYT). 2004. Principales Indicadores de Ciencia Y Tenologia 2003. Buenos Aires , Argentina .
Roosevelt FD. 1944. Letter to Vannevar Bush. 17 November. Washington, DC. http://www.nsf.gov/about/history/vbush1945.htm#letter. Accessed April 2005.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UNESCO/UIS), http://www.uis.unesco.org, accessed 7 April 2005.
U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), Office of the Secretary. 2004. Summary Report on Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer: FY 2003 Activity Metrics and Outcomes, 2004 Report to the President and the Congress Under The Technology Transfer and Commercialization Act.
U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). 2005. Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon System, Department of Defense Budget For Fiscal Year 2006 . http://www.dod.mil/comptroller/defbudget/fy2006/fy2006_weabook.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2005.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2001b. Research and Development: Reported Gap Between Data From Federal Agencies and Their R&D Performers: Results From Non-comparable Data. GAO-01-512R. Washington, DC.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2005. Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2006 . Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2006/pdf/spec.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2005.