| Table 1-2 |
| Changes in mathematics performance of students in grades 4 and 8, by student characteristics and other factors: 1990–2005 and 2003–05 |
| |
| |
| |
Grade 4 |
|
Grade 8 |
| Student characteristic |
1990–2005 |
|
2003–05 |
|
1990–2005 |
|
2003–05 |
| |
| Average score |
|
| Total |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| Sex |
|
| Male |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| Female |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| Race/ethnicity |
|
| White, non-Hispanic |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| Black, non-Hispanic |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| Hispanic |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| Asian/Pacific Islandera |
NA |
|
▲ |
|
NA |
|
▲ |
| American Indian/Alaska Nativeb |
NA |
|
▲ |
|
NA |
|
● |
| Free/reduced-price lunchc |
|
| Eligible |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| Not eligible |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| Percentile scoresd |
|
| 10th |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| 25th |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| 50th |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| 75th |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| 90th |
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
|
▲ |
| Changes in achievement gaps in average scores |
|
| Gender gap |
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
| White-black gap |
▼ |
|
▼ |
|
● |
|
▼ |
| White-Hispanic gap |
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
▼ |
| Eligible and not eligible for free/reduced-price lunch gapc |
▼ |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
| |
▲ = increase; ● = no change; ▼ = decrease (based on t-tests using unrounded numbers); NA = not available
aInsufficient sample size in 1990 for Asian/Pacific Islanders precluded calculation of reliable estimates.
bInsufficient sample size in 1990 for American Indians/Alaska Natives precluded calculation of reliable estimates.
cInformation on student eligibility for free/reduced-price lunch first collected in 1996: comparisons in 1990s columns from 1996 to 2005.
dPercentage of students whose scores fell below a particular score, e.g., 75% of students had scores <75th percentile.
NOTES: 2005 grade 12 assessment not comparable with previous assessments; therefore mathematics trend information for grade 12 not available.
SOURCES: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2005, NCES 2006-453 (2006); National Assessment of Educational Progress, 1990, 1996, 2003, and 2005 mathematics assessments; and National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, special tabulations. See appendix table 1-5.
Science and Engineering Indicators 2008 |
|