American Chemical Society. 2006. Start-up firm NineSigma uses Internet to match industrial clients with inventive partners. Chemical & Engineering News 84(12):30.

American Chemistry Council (American Chemistry). 2007. Accessed 28 March 2007.

Archibugi D, Pianta M. 1992. Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: The analysis of patent data. Research Policy 21(1):79–93. Accessed 31 May 2007.

Archibugi D, Pianta M. 1996. Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation 16(9):451–68. Accessed 31 May 2007.

Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A. 2001. Markets for Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Audretsch DB, Aldridge T, Oettl A. 2005. The knowledge filter and economic growth: the role of scientist entrepreneurship. Working Paper, April 2005. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute of Economics.

Bloom N, Griffith R, Van Reenen J. 2002. Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979–1997. Journal of Public Economics 85:1–31.

Bozeman, B. 2000. Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy 29:627–55.

Branscomb LM, Auerswald PE. 2002. Between Invention and Innovation—An Analysis of Funding for Early-Stage Technology Development. GCR 02-841. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). 1995. A Guide to BEA Statistics on U.S. Multinational Companies. Survey of Current Business March: 38–55.

Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). 2007a. Accessed 6 June 2007.

Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). 2007b. Research and development activities of U.S. multinational companies. Survey of Current Business March: 22–39.

Carlsson B. 2006. Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy 35:56–67.

Cassiman B, Veugelers R. 2002. Complementarity in the innovation strategy: Internal R&D, external technology acquisition, and cooperation in R&D. Research paper 457. Barcelona, Spain: University of Navarra, IESE. Accessed 5 June 2007.

Caves RE. 1996. Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Cambridge University Press.

Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis, and National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. 2005. Research and Development Data Link Project: Final Report. Accessed 5 June 2007.

Census Bureau. 2007. U.S. Service Industry Statistics. Accessed 5 June 2007.

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 2007. The World Fact Book 2007. Accessed 26 March 2006.

Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J. 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press.

Chesbrough H. 2007. Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review 48(2):22–28.

Climate Change Science Program (CCSP). 2007.

Climate Change Technology Program. 2007.

Crow M, Bozeman B. 1998. Limited by Design—R&D Laboratories in the U.S. National Innovation System. New York: Columbia University Press.

Department of Commerce (DOC). 2007.

Department of Energy (DOE). 2006. Annual Report on Technology Transfer and Related Technology Partnering Activities at the National Laboratories and Other Facilities: Fiscal Year 2005. Washington, DC.

Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Joint Genome Institute. 2007.

Dougherty S, Inklarr R, McGuckin R, van Ark B. 2007. International Comparisons of R&D Expenditures: Does an R&D PPP Make a Difference? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 12829. Cambridge, MA.

Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). 2006. Companies without Borders: Collaborating to Compete. London.

Eurostat. 2001. Statistics on Science and Technology in Europe: Data 1985–99. Luxembourg: European Communities.

Fey CF, Birkinshaw J. 2005. External sources of knowledge, governance modes, and R&D performance. Journal of Management 31:597–621.

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 2004. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123. Revised ed. Norwalk, CT. Accessed 5 June 2007.

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 2007. Accessed 25 May 2007.

Fosfuri A. 2006. The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strategic Management Journal 27(12):1141–58.

Gallaher MP, Link AN, Petrusa JE. 2006. Innovation in the U.S. Service Sector. London: Routledge.

Gallaher MP, Petrusa JE. 2006. Innovation in the U.S. service sector. Journal of Technology Transfer 31(6):611–28.

General Accounting Office (GAO). 2001. Research and Development: Reported Gap Between Data From Federal Agencies and Their R&D Performers: Results From Noncomparable Data. GAO-01-512R. Washington, DC.

General Electric Company (GE). 2006. Form 10-K/A for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005. Accessed 23 March 2007.

Godin B. 2006. The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology, and Human Values 31(6):639–67.

Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2004. International Trade, Current Government Data Provide Limited Insight into Offshoring of Services. GAO-04-932. Washington, DC.

Graham JM. 2007. The Measure of a Nation: Quantifying Innovative Strength through Improved Service Sector Metrics. Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR). Accessed 5 June 2007.

Guenther G. 2006. Research and Experimentation Tax Credit: Current Status Legislative Proposals in the 109th Congress, and Policy Issues. RL31181. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

Hagedoorn J. 2002. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy 31(4):477–92.

Hagedoorn J, Lorenz-Orlean S, Kranenburg H. 2007. Inter-Firm Technology Transfer: Partnership-Embedded Licensing or Standard Licensing Agreements? Working Paper Series 006. Maastricht, Germany: United Nations University-Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology [UNU-MERIT].

Hall B. 2001. Tax Incentives for Innovation in the United States. Report to European Union submitted by Asesoria Industrial ZABALA-Spain. Accessed 5 June 2007.

Heisey P, King J, Rubenstein KD, Shoemaker R. 2006. Government Patenting and Technology Transfer. Economic Research Report No. 15. Washington, DC: Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service.

Hempel J. 2006. Crowdsourcing: Milk the masses for inspiration. Business Week. 25 September.

Hira R, Goldstein H. 2005. Top 100 R&D spenders. IEEE Spectrum Online. Accessed 7 March 2007.

Howells J. 2006. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy 35(5):715–28.

Huston L, Sakkab N. 2006. Connect and develop: Inside Procter & Gamble's new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review 84(3).

IBM. 2006. Global innovation outlook 2.0. Accessed 5 June 2007.

Industrial Research Institute (IRI). 2007. IRI's R&D trends forecast for 2007. Research Technology Management 50(1):17–20.

Interagency Working Group on Hydrogen and Fuel Cells. 2007.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 2007. SOI Tax Stats - Corporation Research Credit.,,id=164402,00.html. Accessed 5 June 2007.

Jaffe AJ, Trajtenberg M. 2001. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jankowski J. 2001. Measurement and growth of R&D within the service economy. Journal of Technology Transfer 26(4):323–36.

Jorgenson DW, Landefeld JS, Nordhaus WD, editors. 2006. A New Architecture for the U.S. National Accounts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Knezo GJ. 2006. Homeland Security R&D Funding, Organization, and Oversight. RS21270. Washington, DC: U.S. Congressional Research Service.

Kumar N. 2001. Determinants of location of overseas R&D activity of multinational enterprises: The case of U.S. and Japanese corporations. Research Policy 30:159–74.

Library of Congress. 2007. Accessed 10 September 2007.

Marburger J. 2005a. Keynote Address at Annual American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Forum on Science and Technology Policy, April 21, 2005. Washington, DC. Accessed 5 June 2007.

Marburger J. 2005b. Wanted: Better benchmarks. Science 308(20 May):1087.

Martin S, Scott JT. 2000. The nature of innovation market failures and the design of public support for private innovation. Research Policy 29:437–47.

McEvily SK, Eisenhardt KM, Prescott JE. 2004. The global acquisition, leverage, and protection of technological competencies. Strategic Management Journal 25:713–22.

Mowery DC. 1983. The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900–1940. Explorations in Economic History 20:351–74.

National Academies. 2007. Accessed 10 June 2007.

National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). 2006. Off-shoring: an Elusive Phenomenon. Report for the U.S. Congress and the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Washington, DC.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2007.

National Coordination Office for Networking and Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD). 2007.

National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI). 2007.

National Research Council (NRC). 2003. Government-Industry Partnerships for the Development of New Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 2005a. Measuring Research and Development Expenditures in the U.S. Economy. L.D. Brown, T.J. Plewes, and M.A. Gerstein, Editors. National Academies Press: Washington, DC.

National Research Council (NRC). 2005b. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 2007. SBIR and the Phase III Challenge of Commercialization: Report of a Symposium. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Science Board (NSB). 2006. Research and Development: Funds and Technology Linkages. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Volume 1. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. NSB 06-01.

National Science Foundation, Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences (NSF/SBE). 2007. Accessed 6 June 2007.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2002a. Proposed FY 2003 Budget Would Complete Plan to Double R&D Funding, Considerably Expand Defense R&D. NSF InfoBrief 02-326.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2002b. Research and Development in Industry: 1999. Accessed 25 June 2007.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2004a. Industrial R&D Employment in the United States and in U.S. Multinational Corporations. NSF 05-302. Arlington, VA. Accessed 12 September 2007.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2004b. Survey of Industrial Research and Development. Washington, DC.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2006a. Advancing Measures of Innovation: Knowledge Flows, Business Metrics, and Measurement Strategies, June 6–7, 2006. Accessed 5 June 2007.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2006b. Definitions of Research and Development: An Annotated Compilation of Official Sources. Arlington, VA. Accessed 5 June 2007.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2006c. Trade in R&D-Related Services: A New Indicator of Industrial Knowledge Flows. NSF InfoBrief 06-326. Accessed 5 June 2007.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2007a. Asia's Rising Science and Technology Strength: Comparative Indicators for Asia, the European Union, and the United States. NSF 07-319. Arlington, VA.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2007b. Federal Funds for Research and Development: Fiscal Years 2004-06. Detailed Statistical Tables. NSF 07-323. Arlington, VA.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2007c. Federal Science and Engineering Support to Universities, Colleges, and Nonprofit Institutions: FY 2004 Detailed Statistical Tables. NSF 07-316. Arlington, VA.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2007d. InfoBrief: Revised Industry Classification Better Reflects Structure of Business R&D in the United States. Arlington, VA. Accessed 25 June 2007.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2007e. Linking Multinational Corporations Data from International Investment Surveys and Industrial R&D Surveys. NSF InfoBrief 07-310. Arlington, VA.

National Science Foundation, Office of Polar Programs (NSF/OPP). 2007. Accessed 8 June 2007.

Nelson R. 1988. Modeling the connections in the cross section between technical progress and R&D intensity. RAND Journal of Economics 19(3):478–85.

Niosi J. 1999. The internationalization of industrial R&D: From technology transfer to the learning organization. Research Policy 28:107–17.

Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2007. Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Accessed 5 June 2007.

Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), Executive Office of the President. 2006. American Competitiveness Initiative. Washington, DC.

Okubo S, Robbins CA, Moylan CE, Sliker BK, Schultz LI, Mataloni LS. 2006. BEA's 2006 research and development satellite account: Preliminary estimates of R&D for 1959–2002 and effect on GDP and other measures. Survey of Current Business (December):14–44. Accessed 5 June 2007.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1999. Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 1999: Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies. Paris.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2002. Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development (Frascati Manual). Paris.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2003. Tax Incentives for Research and Development: Trends and Issues. Paris.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2005. Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2006a. "Blue Sky II 2006": What Indicators for Science, Technology and Innovation Policies in the 21st Century?,2340,en_2649_34451_37075032_1_1_1_1,00.html. Accessed 6 June 2007.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2006b. Main Science and Technology Indicators Database.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2006c. Recent Trends in the Internationalisation of R&D in the Enterprise Sector, Special Session on Globalisation. Working Party on Statistics, DSTI/EAS/IND/SWP(2006)1. Paris.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2006d. Research and Development Expenditure in Industry Analytical Business Enterprise Research and Development (ANBERD) 1987–2004. Paris.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). 2006a. New Drug Approvals in 2005. Accessed 19 February 2007.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). 2006b. 2005 Industry Profile. Accessed 19 February 2007.

RAND Science and Technology Policy Institute. 2003. Technology Transfer of Federally Funded R&D: Perspectives from a Forum. Prepared for the Office of Science and Technology Policy. Washington, DC.

Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnologia (RICYT). Ibero-American Network of Science & Technology Indicators. 2007. Accessed 5 March 2007.

Rosenberg N, Nelson RR. 1994. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy 23:323–48.

Shepherd C, Payson S. 1999. U.S. Corporate R&D. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

Sopranos K. 2004. The age of experience. Boeing Frontiers 3(8). Accessed 12 June 2007.

Steelman JR. 1947. Science and Public Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Reprinted 1980. New York: Arno Press.

Stuart TE, Sorenson O. 2003. Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Administrative Science Quarterly (June).

Tassey G. 1996. Choosing government R&D policies: Tax incentives vs. direct funding. Review of Industrial Organization 11(5):579–600.

Teece DJ. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy 15:285–305.

Thursby J, Thursby M. 2006. Here or There? A Survey on the Factors in Multinational R&D Location. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

TOP500 Supercomputer Sites. 2007. Accessed 5 June 2007.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Institute for Statistics. 2007.

United Nations (UN) System of National Accounts 1993 (SNA 1993). Accessed 19 June 2007.

von Zedtwitz M, Gassmann O. 2002. Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy 31:569–88.

Ward M. 1985. Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures in the OECD. Paris: OECD.

Wilson DJ. 2007. Beggar thy Neighbor? The In-State, Out-of-State, and Aggregate Effects of R&D Tax Credits. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper. Forthcoming in Review of Economics and Statistics.

Right-click on image to save.