Adamic L. 2000. Zipf, Power-laws, and Pareto—A Ranking Tutorial. Palo Alto: Information Dynamics Lab, HP Labs. http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/ranking/ranking.html. Accessed 19 June 2009.
Adams J, Black G, Clemmons R, Stephan P. 2005. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999. Research Policy 34:259–85.
Association of American Universities. 2006. University Research: Understanding its Role. http://www.aau.edu/research/university_research.aspx?id=6896. Accessed 4 February 2009.
Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM). 2009. AUTM Licensing Activity Survey Full Report, FY 2007. Tieckelmann R, Kordal R, Flanigan S, Glavicic-Théberge T, Bostrom D, editors. http://www.autm.net/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Licensing_Surveys_AUTM. Accessed 18 May 2009.
Benderly B. 2004. The incredible shrinking tenure track. Science Career Magazine. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_development/previous_issues/articles/3150/the_incredible_shrinking_tenure_track. Accessed 19 June 2009.
Bordons M, Gómez I. 2000. Collaboration networks in science. In: Cronin B, Atkins HB, editors. The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. p 197–213.
Brainard J, Borrego A. 2003. Academic pork barrel tops $2-billion for the first time. The Chronicle of Higher Education 50(5):A18. http://chronicle.com/weekly/v50/i05/05a01801.htm. Accessed February 2009.
Brainard J, and Hermes JJ. 2008. College's earmarks grow, amid criticism. The Chronicle of Higher Education 54(29):A1. http://chronicle.com/free/v54/i29/29a00101.htm. Accessed February 2009.
Branstetter L, Ogura Y. 2005. Is academic science driving a surge in industrial innovation? Evidence from patent citations. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper 11561. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11561. Accessed 27 June 2009.
Check E. 2007. More biologists but tenure stays static. Nature (448):848–49. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v448/n7156/full/448848a.html. Accessed 21 June 2009.
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP). 2007. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Fox MF. 2005. Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science 35(February):131–50.
Garrison HH, McGuire K. 2008. Education and employment of biological and medical scientists: Data from national surveys (updated November 2008). Bethesda, MD: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. http://opa.faseb.org/pages/PolicyIssues/training_datappt.htm. Accessed 19 June 2009.
Ginther D. 2001. Does science discriminate against women? Evidence from academia, 1973–97. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta working paper 2001-02. http://www.frbatlanta.org/invoke.cfm?objectid=83FD23CB-9AF0-11D5-898400508BB89A83&method=display. Accessed 19 June 2009.
Glänzel W. 2001. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics 51(1):69–115.
Glänzel W, Schubert A. 2004. Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: Moed HFM, Glänzel W, Schmoch U, editors. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies on S&T Systems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 257–76.
Glänzel W, Schubert A. 2005. Domesticity and internationality in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics 65(3):323–42.
Gómez I, Fernández MT, Sebastián J. 1999. Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 44(3):441–57.
Hosek SD, Cox AG, Ghosh-Dastidar B, Kofner A, Ramphal N, Scott J, Berry SH. 2005. Gender differences in major federal external grant programs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/2005/RAND_TR307.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2009.
Katz J, Martin B. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26:1–18.
Laudel G. 2002. Collaboration and reward. What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation 11(1):3–15.
Long JS, editor; Panel for the Study of Gender Differences in Career Outcomes of Science and Engineering Ph.D.s; Committee on Women in Science and Engineering; National Research Council. 2001. From Scarcity to Visibility: Gender Differences in the Careers of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Lundberg J, Tomson G, Lundkvist I, Skår J, Brommels M. 2006. Collaboration uncovered: Exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics 69(3):575–89.
Merton RK. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Storer NW, editor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mowery D. 2002. The changing role of universities in the 21st century U.S. R&D system. In: Teich A, Nelson D, Lita S, editors. AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2002. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. p 253–71.
Narin F, Stevens K, Whitlow E. 1991. Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics 21(3):313–23.
Narin F, Hamilton K, Olivastro D. 1997. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy 26:317–30.
National Research Council (NRC). 2005. Bridges to Independence: Fostering the Independence of New Investigators in Biomedical Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council (NRC). 2009. Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering and Mathematics Faculty. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Science Board (NSB). 2006. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Two volumes. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (volume 1, NSB 06-01; volume 2, NSB 06-01A).
National Science Board (NSB). 2008. Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. Two volumes. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (volume 1, NSB 08-01; volume 2, NSB 08-01A).
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2004. Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers. NSF 04-323. Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2006. Academic institutions of minority faculty with S&E doctorates. NSF 06-318. Joan Burrelli. Arlington VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2007. Changing U.S. output of scientific articles: 1988–2003. NSF 07-320. Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2008. Thirty-three years of women in S&E faculty positions. NSF 08-308, Joan Burrelli. Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2009a. Federally funded R&D centers. Master government list. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/ffrdc. Accessed 14 August 2009.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2009b. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2009. NSF 09-305. Arlington, VA. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/. Accessed 19 June 2009.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2010. U.S. academic scientific publishing. Arlington, VA. Forthcoming.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2009. 1990–2006 Earned doctorates: Where and how are they used? Results of the First Data Collection on Careers of Doctorate Holders. Paris. Forthcoming.
Owen-Smith J, Powell W. 2001. To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer 26:99–114.
Owen-Smith J, Powell W. 2003. The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Research Policy 32:1695–1711.
Rosser S, Daniels JZ, Wu L. 2006. Institutional factors contributing to the dearth of women stem faculty: Classification and status matter; location doesn't. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 12(1):79–93.
Schubert A, Glänzel W. 2006. Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics 69(2):409–28.
Stephan P, Gurmu S, Sumell A, Black G. 2007. Who's patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of earned doctorates. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16(2):71–99.
Thursby J, Jensen R, Thursby M. 2001. Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 26:59–72.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 2005. Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Review. The Islamic Republic of Iran. http://stdev.unctad.org/docs/iranstip.doc. Accessed 22 May 2009.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). 2008. Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2008. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/annual/2008/index.html. Accessed 19 June 2009.
Wagner C, Roessner JD, Bobb K. 2009. SRS Task Order 45: Indicators of Interdisciplinary S&E Research. Final Report. Unpublished report to National Science Foundation.
Wagner C, Roessner JD, Bobb K, Klein J, Boyack K, Keyton J, Rafols I, Börner K. 2009. Evaluating the Output of Interdisciplinary Scientific Research: A Review of the Literature. Unpublished report to National Science Foundation.
Wuchty S, Jones B, Uzzi B. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316:1036–39.
Zitt M, Bassecoulard E, Okubo Y. 2000. Shadows of the past in international collaboration: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics 47(3):627–57.