Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton-Smith I. 2008. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science 17(January):35–54.
American Council on Education 2006. GED Tests of General Educational Development. Science Official GED Practice Test. Washington: DC: GED Testing Service.
Bann CM, Schwerin MJ. 2004. Public knowledge and attitudes scale construction: Development of short forms. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics.
Barlow S, Chesson A, Collins JD, Flynn A, Hardy A, Jany KD, Knaap A, Kuiper H, Larsen JC, Le Neindre P, Schans J, Schlatter J, Silano V, Skerfving S, Vannier P. 2009. The potential risks arising from nanoscience and nanotechnologies on food and feed safety. Parma, Italy: European Food Safety Authority. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1211902361968.htm. Accessed 22 June 2009.
Broder JM, Connelly M. 2007. Public remains split on response to warming. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/27/washington/27poll.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1. Accessed 9 October 2009.
Canadian Biotechnology Secretariat. 2005. Canada–U.S. Survey on Biotechnology. Ottawa, Ontario.
Chatterjee R. 2008. The continuing uncertainty of nano risks and regulations. Environmental Science & Technology 42(21):7733. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1021/es802396x. Accessed 22 June 2009.
China Research Institute for Science Popularization (CRISP). 2008. Chinese public understanding of science and attitudes towards science and technology. Beijing, China.
Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology. 2002. Public scientific literacy and attitudes towards S&T. China Science and Technology Indicators 2002. Beijing, China.
Cole J. 2007. Surveying the digital future: Year 6. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Annenberg School, Center for the Digital Future. http://www.digitalcenter.org/pages/site_content.asp?intGlobalId=20. Accessed 25 June 2009.
Crettaz von Roten F. 2006. Do we need a public understanding of statistics? Public Understanding of Science 15:243–249.
Decima Research. 2006. Emerging technologies tracking research. Industry Canada. http://www.bioportal.gc.ca/ENGLISH/View.asp?pmiid=524&x=837. Accessed 26 June 2009.
European Commission (EC). 2005. Europeans, science and technology. Eurobarometer 224/Wave 63.1. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_224_report_en.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2009.
European Commission (EC). 2007. Scientific research in the media. Eurobarometer 282/Wave 67.2. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_282_en.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2009.
European Commission (EC). 2008a. Attitudes towards radioactive waste. Special Eurobarometer 297/Wave 69.1. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_297_en.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2009.
European Commission (EC). 2008b. Europeans' attitudes towards climate change. Special Eurobarometer 300/Wave 69.2. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_300_full_en.pdf. Accessed 6 August 2009.
Falk JH, Storksdieck M, Dierking LD. 2007. Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science 16(October):455–469.
Friedman, A, editor. 2008. Framework for evaluating impacts of informal science education projects. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Fundacion BBVA. 2008. BBVA Foundation international study on attitudes towards stem cell research and hybrid embryos. http://www.fbbva.es/TLFU/dat/international_study_biotechnology_08.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2009.
The Gallup Organization. 2009a. Environment. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspx. Accessed 9 October 2009.
The Gallup Organization. 2009b. Most important problem. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1675/Most-Important-Problem.aspx. Accessed 9 October 2009.
The Gallup Organization. 2009c. Stem Cell Research. http://www.gallup.com/poll/21676/Stem-Cell-Research.aspx. Accessed 20 October 2009.
Gaskell G, Stares S, Allansdottir A, Allum A, Corchero C, Fischler C, Hampel J, Jackson J, Kronberger N, Mejlgaard N, Revuelta G, Schreiner C, Torgerson H, Wagner W. 2006. Eurobarometer 224/Wave 64.3. Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and trends. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/eb_64_3_final_report_second_edition_july_06.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2009.
Gokhberg L, Shuvalova O. 2004. Russian Public Opinion of the Knowledge Economy: Science, Innovation, Information Technology and Education as Drivers of Economic Growth and Quality of Life. Moscow, Russia: The British Council-Russia.
Harris Interactive. 2006. Doctors and teachers most trusted among 22 occupations and professions: Fewer adults trust the President to tell the truth. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=688. Accessed 19 June 2009.
Harris Interactive. 2008a. Four out of five adults now use the Internet. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=973. Accessed 23 June 2009.
Harris Interactive. 2008b. Prestige paradox: High pay doesn't necessarily equal high prestige: Teachers' prestige increases the most over 30 years. The Harris Poll. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=939. Accessed 23 June 2009.
Holbrook AL, Green MD, Krosnick JA. 2003. Mode effects on satisficing and social desirability. Public Opinion Quarterly 67(1):79–125.
Horrigan J. 2006. The Internet as a resource for news and information about science. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/The-Internet-as-a-Resource-for-News-and-Information-about-Science.aspx. Accessed 17 June 2009.
Internet World Statistics. 2009. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm. Accessed 20 October 2009.
Jasanoff S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jones JM. 2009, March 20. Support for nuclear energy inches up to a new high: Majority believes nuclear plants are safe. The Gallup Organization. http://www.gallup.com/poll/117025/Support-Nuclear-Energy-Inches-New-High.aspx. Accessed 20 October 2009.
Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (KOFAC). 2009. Survey of public attitudes toward an understanding of science and technology 2008. Seoul, Korea.
Korea Science Foundation. 2004. Survey on public attitudes of science and technology 2004. Seoul, Korea.
Krosnick JA. 2000. The threat of satisficing in surveys: The shortcuts respondents take in answering questions. Survey Methods Newsletter 20(1):4–8.
Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Lowe L, Visser, PS. 2006. The origins and consequences of democratic citizens' policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change 77(July):7–43.
Losh, SC. 2009. Generation, education, gender and ethnicity in American digital divides. In: Ferro E, Dwivedi YK, Gil-Garcia JR, Williams MD, editors. IGI Handbook: Overcoming Digital Divides: Constructing an Equitable and Competitive Information Society. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Losh, SC. 2010. Age, generational, and educational effects on American adult public understanding of science. In: Bauer MW, Shukla R and Allum N, editors. The Culture of Science—How does the public relate to science across the globe? New York: Routledge. Forthcoming.
Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre (MASTIC), Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment. 2004. Public awareness of science and technology Malaysia 2004. http://www.mastic.gov.my/servlets/sfs;jsessionid=C12A6B8942252F13AFF9629775A74049?s=16ii7KxhiMVMSmF9R2Z&t=/contentManager/onStory&i=1108620651187&b=1108620651187&l=0&e=UTF-8&active=no&ParentID=1116297677695&sort=Price&StoryID=1145866808812. Accessed 23 June 2009.
Malhotra N, Krosnick JA, Haertel E. 2007. The psychometric properties of the GSS Wordsum Vocabulary Test. GSS Methodological Report 11.
Mason Kiefer, H. 2003. Americans, Britons at odds on animal testing. The Gallup Poll. http://www.gallup.com/poll/9178/Americans-Britons-Odds-Animal-Testing.aspx. Accessed 9 October 2009.
Maugh II TH, Kaplan K. 2008, September 19. FDA proposes approval process for genetically engineered animals. Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2008/sep/19/science/sci-genetic19. Accessed 9 October 2009.
Mellman Group, Inc. 2005. Recent findings. http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/News/Press_Releases/Food_and_Biotechnology/PIFB_Public_Sentiment_GM_Foods2005.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2009.
Mellman Group, Inc. 2006. Review of public opinion research. http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Public_Opinion/Food_and_Biotechnology/2006summary.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2009.
Miller JD. 1983. The American people and science policy: The role of public attitudes in the policy process. New York: Pergamon Press Inc.
Ministry of Science and Technology (MCT) of Brazil. 2006. Public perceptions of science and technology. http://www.mct.gov.br/upd_blob/0013/13511.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2009.
The National Academies. 2008a. Review of the federal strategy for nanotechnology-related environmental safety research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12559&page=R1. Accessed 18 June 2009.
The National Academies. 2008b. Understanding and responding to climate change: Highlights of National
Academies report. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. http://dels.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/climate_change_2008_final.pdf. Accessed 6 August 2009.
National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. 2002. The 2001 survey of public attitudes toward and understanding of science and technology in Japan. Tokyo, Japan.
National Research Council. 2009. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. Philip Bell, Bruce Lewenstein, Andrew W. Shouse, and Michael A. Feder, Editors. Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Board (NSB). 2002. Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. NSB-02-01A. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
National Science Board (NSB). 2006. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. NSB 06-01; NSB 06-01A. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
National Science Board (NSB). 2008. Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. NSB 08-01; NSB 08-01A. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Newport F. 2008. Post-Derby tragedy: 38% support banning animal racing. http://www.gallup.com/poll/107293/PostDerby-Tragedy-38-Support-Banning-Animal-Racing.aspx. Accessed 9 October 2009.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2003. The PISA 2003 assessment framework—Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris.
Peter D. Hart Research Associates, Inc. 2008. Awareness of and attitudes toward nanotechnology and synthetic biology: A report of findings based on a national survey among adults. Conducted on behalf of the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/7040/final-synbioreport.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2009.
Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. 2008. Declining majority of Americans favor embryonic stem cell research. http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=317. Accessed 9 October 2009.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2008. Key news audiences now blend online and traditional sources. Audience segments in a changing news environment. (Aug 17 2008) http://people-press.org/report/444/news-media. Accessed 24 June 2009.
Pidgeon N, Harthorn BH, Bryant K, Rogers-Hayden T. 2009. Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology 4:95–98.
Project for Excellence in Journalism (PEJ). 2008. The state of the news media: An annual report on American journalism. http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2008/. Accessed 18 June 2009.
Project for Excellence in Journalism (PEJ). 2009. The state of the news media: An annual report on American journalism. http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2009/. Accessed 9 October 2009.
Roth W-M, Lee S. 2002. Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science 11:33–56.
Saad L. 2008a. Cultural tolerance for divorce grows to 70%. The Gallup Poll. http://www.gallup.com/poll/107380/Cultural-Tolerance-Divorce-Grows-70.aspx. Accessed 9 October 2009.
Saad L. 2008b. Economic anxiety surges in past year: Economy ties healthcare as American's top issue concern. The Gallup Poll. http://www.gallup.com/poll/105802/Economic-Anxiety-Surges-Past-Year.aspx. Accessed 23 June 2009.
Saad L. 2009. Water pollution Americans' top green concern: Worry about environmental problems has edged up since 2004. The Gallup Poll. http://www.gallup.com/poll/117079/Water-Pollution-Americans-Top-Green-Concern.aspx. Accessed 22 June 2009.
Shukla R. 2005. India Science Report: Science Education, Human Resources, and Public Attitude toward Science and Technology. New Delhi, India: National Council of Applied Economic Research.
Tyndall Report. 2009. Tyndallreport.com. Accessed 9 October 2009.
Villar A, Krosnick JA. 2009. "Global Warming" vs. "Climate Change": Does word choice matter? Unpublished manuscript. Stanford CA: Stanford University.
Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Center for Public Policy. 2006. Opinions shifting on stem cell research; opposition to cloning continues. VCU Life Sciences Survey. http://www.vcu.edu/lifesci/images2/ls_survey_2006_report.pdf. Accessed June 23 2009.
Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Center for Public Policy. 2007. Widespread support for non-embryonic stem cell research but continued need for both kinds of research. VCU Life Sciences Survey. http://www.vcu.edu/lifesci/images2/survey2007.pdf. Accessed June 23 2009.
Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Center for Public Policy. 2008. VCU survey finds support for genetic research, testing, and government spending on scientific research. VCU Life Sciences Survey. http://www.vcu.edu/lifesci/images2/survey2008.pdf. Accessed June 23 2009.
Yaar E. 2006. Science and technology in the Israeli consciousness. Samuel Neaman Institute. Haifa, Israel. http://www.neaman.org.il/Neaman/publications/publication_item.asp?fid=757&parent_fid=488&iid=3428. Accessed 22 June 2009.
Back to top