Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities: Summary Report 1998

Appendix B: Trend Tables, 1988-1998

Appendix B includes the following two tables:

B-1 Number of Doctorate Recipients, by Subfield, 1988-1998
B-2 Number of Doctorate Recipients, by Sex, Race/Ethnicity, and Citizenship, 1978, 1983, and 1988-1998

Table B-1 top

Table B-1 presents data for the most recent decade by subfield of doctorate. In general, the subfields correspond to the fields on the questionnaire's Specialties List located at the back of the survey form in appendix D; some subfields, however, do not appear on the current Specialties List because they are no longer included in the survey taxonomy. A dash (—) in a column indicates that the field was not on the Specialties List for that year.

Field groupings in this table may differ from those in reports published by Federal sponsors of the Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED); see appendix E for a description of field groupings as reported in these tables. The "general" field categories—for example, "chemistry, general"—include individuals who either received the doctorate in the general subject area or did not indicate a particular specialty field. The "other" field categories—for example, "chemistry, other"—include individuals whose specified doctoral discipline was not among the specialty fields.

The seven tables in appendix A present additional information on the most recent cohort of research doctorate recipients by field of doctorate.

Table B-2 top

Table B-2 displays, by sex and citizenship, data on the race/ethnicity of doctorate recipients for 1978, 1983 ,and the past decade. Table B-2 contains three panels, each displayed on a separate page. The first panel includes all doctorates; the others disaggregate the data by sex.

New follow-up procedures implemented in 1990 and later years have increased coverage of several variables, including citizenship and race/ethnicity. One result has been greater postsurvey adjustment to racial/ethnic data than in earlier years. (Note: The greatest adjustment was to the numbers of black doctorate recipients in 1990 and 1991—an increase of about 7.5 percent each year.)

The racial/ethnic question has undergone several revisions over the years. In 1977 it was modified to correspond to a standard question format recommended by the Federal Interagency Committee on Education and adopted by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for use in Federally sponsored surveys; an explanation of the effect of these changes is detailed on page 13 of Summary Report 1977. (Note: Changes in the OMB guidelines prompted the moving of persons having origins in the Indian subcontinent from the white category to the Asian category.) In 1980 the item was further revised in two ways: (1) the Hispanic category was.100 subdivided into Puerto Rican, Mexican American, and other Hispanic to provide more detail for users of the racial/ethnic data and (2) respondents were asked to check only one racial category. (Before 1980 doctorate recipients could check more than one category to indicate their race.) The item was modified again 1982 to separate the questions on race and ethnicity. Since then respondents have been asked to first check one of four racial group categories (American Indian, Asian, black, or white) and then indicate whether or not they are Hispanic. In Table B-2, doctorate recipients who reported Hispanic heritage, regardless of racial designation, are counted as Hispanic. The remaining survey respondents are then counted in their respective racial groups. (Note: Doctorate recipients who checked the category "American Indian or Alaskan Native" are identified as American Indian in this report.)

Tables A-2 and A-4 in appendix A present additional information on the most recent cohort of doctorate recipients by race/ethnicity.

Previous Section Top of page Next Section Table of Contents Help SRS Homepage