nsf.gov - NCSES U.S. Academic Scientific Publishing - US National Science Foundation (NSF)
text-only page produced automatically by LIFT Text
Transcoder Skip all navigation and go to page contentSkip top navigation and go to directorate navigationSkip top navigation and go to page navigation
National Science Foundation National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics
U.S. Academic Scientific Publishing

7.0 Decomposition of Variability: Between and Within Institution Components



 

This section discusses the finding that almost all of the variability in publication and citation counts and in resources used for research occurs between institutions, rather than across years within institutions. As a result, models based on the dataset are more sensitive to differences between institutions (e.g., the relationship of average resources to average publications across years) than to how changes in resources within institutions are related to changes in publication counts for those institutions.

Most of the variability in the citations and publications counts, when aggregated to the institutional-year level, occurs between institutions. Regressing an indicator variable for institution on the first principal component results in an r-square of 0.918. (If institution is entered as a random effect rather than a fixed effect, the r-square is 0.910). Thus, to a substantial extent modeling using the publication trends database will be differentiating publication and citation levels between institutions, rather than modeling changes that occur over time within institutions. Adding a linear year term as an independent variable increases r-square to 0.934. Adding an interaction between year and institution (which allows for different linear publication trends by institution) increases r-square to 0.943.

Most of the variability in the independent variables also occurs between institutions. Institution accounts for the following proportion of variance among prominent independent variables: total academic R&D (97.6%), number of S&E Ph.D. recipients (98.3%), number of postdoctoral researchers (97.5%), number of faculty (97.1%), and number of non-faculty doctoral research staff (92.6%).

































































 
U.S. Academic Scientific Publishing
Working Paper | SRS 11-201 | November 2010