Despite meaningful increases in the number of women pursing STEM disciplines in college, the participation of women still lags behind that of men. Reasons for continuing disparities were studied by examining the critical role of gender disparities in belonging, or the degree to which men tend to feel a greater sense of acceptance, fit, and respect within STEM fields compared to women. We specifically focused on factors that impact feelings of belonging and the mechanisms through which belonging impacts STEM achievement and representation. We also began applying this information to the development and testing of interventions to increase belonging.
The project used a range of methods to meet these goals, including large scale surveys, lab studies, and field studies. To study factors that affect sense of belonging, we conducted several large surveys of students in gateway STEM courses. We replicated gender differences favoring men in belonging (as well as self-efficacy). We also examined an ability analog to social belonging that reflects the degree to which students feel they fit in with their peers intellectually (e.g., have the same ability as their peers). In our samples, men also report more ability belonging than women. Moreover, both social belonging and ability belonging predict subsequent intentions to persist in STEM and do so more strongly for women than for men. These studies also examined factors that may buffer students against the negative effects of low belonging or self-efficacy, showing a benefit of both liking for and comfort with their peers and perceived professor warmth and support.
Additional studies focused more specifically on peer interactions, examining the effects of gender composition on students working in groups, a frequent occurrence in many STEM classes. In both lab and field studies, we found that women feel a lower sense of belonging when in the numerical minority in a workgroup. Gender composition also affected women?s confidence in their own math ability, as well as their group members? perceptions of their ability (Grover, Ito & Park, 2017).
Mechanisms through which belonging affects STEM achievement and representation were further examined in lab studies focused on the role of gender stereotypes on women?s interest in STEM (Ito & McPherson, 2018; McPherson, Park, & Ito, 2017; Stout, Grunberg, & Ito, 2016). These studies particularly highlight the impact of incongruity between women?s self-perceptions and their perceptions of people who pursues STEM.
Finally, a number of studies focused on intervening to change belonging. In the lab, we did this by exploring how the structure of a group activity influences men and women?s contributions, and consequently, their sense of belonging. In addition, in two large field studies, we examined the benefit of a brief, 15-min writing exercise designed to normalize questions of belonging and demonstrate to students that these doubts diminish. This intervention showed numerous promising findings such as increased belonging and self-efficacy, and higher course grades.
Last Modified: 10/31/2018
Modified by: Tiffany A Ito