Award Abstract # 1251590
Broadening Women's Participation in STEM: The Critical Role of Belonging

NSF Org: HRD
Division Of Human Resource Development
Awardee: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, THE
Initial Amendment Date: August 24, 2013
Latest Amendment Date: January 16, 2014
Award Number: 1251590
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: Jolene Jesse
jjesse@nsf.gov
 (703)292-7303
HRD
 Division Of Human Resource Development
EHR
 Direct For Education and Human Resources
Start Date: September 1, 2013
End Date: August 31, 2018 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $1,030,439.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $1,030,439.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2013 = $1,030,439.00
History of Investigator:
  • Tiffany  Ito (Principal Investigator)
    Tiffany.Ito@colorado.edu  (303)492-5879
  • Steven  Pollock (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Noah  Finkelstein (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Jane  Stout (Co-Principal Investigator)
Awardee Sponsored Research Office: University of Colorado at Boulder
3100 Marine Street, Room 481
Boulder
CO  US  80303-1058
(303)492-6221
Sponsor Congressional District: 02
Primary Place of Performance: University of Colorado at Boulder
3100 Marine Street, Room 479
Boulder
CO  US  80303-1058
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
02
DUNS ID: 007431505
Parent DUNS ID: 007431505
NSF Program(s): RES ON GENDER IN SCI & ENGINE
Primary Program Source: 040106 NSF Education & Human Resource
Program Reference Code(s): 8212, 9177, SMET
Program Element Code(s): 1544
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
CFDA Number(s): 47.076

ABSTRACT

This research seeks to understand the causes of women's lower rates of participation and achievement in STEM compared to men. The focus is specifically on the role of belonging in STEM defined as feeling a sense of fit, personal acceptance, respect, and inclusion as a member of an academic discipline. The study builds on two key prior observations: (1) belonging is well documented to facilitate a range of positive academic outcomes such as achievement and motivation, but (2) women report feeling a lower sense of belonging in STEM than do men. Recent research, including preliminary work by the research team, indicates that such gender differences in belonging underlie gender differences in STEM representation and achievement, but key questions remain. First, why do women experience a lower sense of belonging in STEM than men? The research addresses this by investigating theoretically-derived antecedents of belonging and how they may produce differences in belonging between men and women in STEM. Second, how does a thwarted sense of belonging in STEM translate into lower performance and motivation? The proposed research specifically tests whether questioning one's sense of fit in a domain consumes cognitive resources that would otherwise be used for learning and performance, producing reductions in working memory capacity that underlie the negative effects of low belonging on academic outcomes. The particular focus in this research, to be conducted at the University of Colorado, will be women?s achievement and retention within the physical sciences, technology engineering, and math (pSTEM), where gender disparities have been particularly large and persistent.

These research questions will be addressed with a large prospective field study and several experimental lab studies. The field study assesses both the antecedents of belonging, and the impact of belonging on short-term and long-term academic outcomes. This will be accomplished by surveying men and women enrolled in gateway pSTEM classes several times during the semester, then tracking their academic performance throughout their college career. Factors identified in past research as possible antecedents of belonging (instructor support, general social support, compatibility of life goals with pSTEM careers, and salience of gender stereotypes in pSTEM) will be measured earlier in the semester, and their impact of end-of-semester belonging will be assessed. We will also assess how belonging in turn influences course outcomes (e.g., course grade), as well as longer-term outcomes such as grades in subsequent pSTEM classes and retention in a pSTEM major. The field study will be complemented by controlled lab studies that test the direct effect of belonging on performance and learning, and whether any decreases in belonging are driven by reduced working memory capacity. These studies will take the form of varying situational cues that should impact belonging among women, then measuring working memory capacity and either performance on tests of already learned pSTEM material or learning of new pSTEM content. Analyses will assess whether decrements in women's performance and learning are mediated by decreases in working memory capacity.

Despite meaningful increases in the number of women pursing STEM disciplines in college, women's pursuit of and achievement within pSTEM disciplines still lags behind that of men. The main goal of this research is to understand the role that a sense of fit and acceptance within STEM plays in this gender gap. The ultimate goal is to inform empirically-rooted interventions that foster a secure sense of belonging among all students pursing pSTEM. For example, knowledge of factors that influence belonging, and how such factors may operate within actual pSTEM classes to produce lower belonging almng women, could be used to shape educational practices to minimize such gender differences. Similarly, knowledge of how threats to belonging impair performance and learning could lead to strategies that minimize these effects in authentic learning contexts. Moreover, while the proposed work is focused on understanding gender disparities in belonging and how these produce gender disparities in pSTEM achievement and representation, a fuller understanding of how belonging translates into positive academic outcomes should serve the broader goal of increasing participation among other underrepresented groups, as well as facilitating achievement and retention of all students in STEM.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

Ito, T.A. & McPherson, E "Factors influencing high school students? interest in pSTEM." Frontiers in Psychology , v.9 , 2018 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01535
Lewis, K.L., Stout, J.G., Cohen, G.L., Pollock, S.J., Finkelstein, N.D., & Ito, T.A. "Fitting in to Move Forward: Using a Belonging Framework to Understand Gender Disparities in Persistence in the Physical Sciences, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (pSTEM)" Psychology of Women Quarterly , 2017
McPherson, E., Park, B., & Ito, T.A. "The role of prototype matching in science pursuits: Perceptions of scientists that are inaccurate and diverge from self-perceptions predict reduced interest in a science career" Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , v.44 , 2018 , p.881
Lewis, K.L., Stout, J.G., Pollock, S.J., Finkelstein, N.D, & Ito, T.A "Fitting in or opting out: A review of key social?psychological factors influencing a sense of belonging for women in physics" Physical Review Physics Education Research. , 2016
Stout, J.G., Grunberg, V.A., Ito, T.A. "Gender roles and stereotypes about science careers help explain women?s and men?s science pursuits" Sex Roles , 2016
Grover, S.G., Ito, T.A., & Park, B. "The effects of gender composition on women?s experience in math work groups." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , v.112 , 2017 , p.877 10.1037/pspi0000090

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Despite meaningful increases in the number of women pursing STEM disciplines in college, the participation of women still lags behind that of men. Reasons for continuing disparities were studied by examining the critical role of gender disparities in belonging, or the degree to which men tend to feel a greater sense of acceptance, fit, and respect within STEM fields compared to women. We specifically focused on factors that impact feelings of belonging and the mechanisms through which belonging impacts STEM achievement and representation. We also began applying this information to the development and testing of interventions to increase belonging.

The project used a range of methods to meet these goals, including large scale surveys, lab studies, and field studies. To study factors that affect sense of belonging, we conducted several large surveys of students in gateway STEM courses. We replicated gender differences favoring men in belonging (as well as self-efficacy). We also examined an ability analog to social belonging that reflects the degree to which students feel they fit in with their peers intellectually (e.g., have the same ability as their peers). In our samples, men also report more ability belonging than women. Moreover, both social belonging and ability belonging predict subsequent intentions to persist in STEM and do so more strongly for women than for men. These studies also examined factors that may buffer students against the negative effects of low belonging or self-efficacy, showing a benefit of both liking for and comfort with their peers and perceived professor warmth and support.

Additional studies focused more specifically on peer interactions, examining the effects of gender composition on students working in groups, a frequent occurrence in many STEM classes. In both lab and field studies, we found that women feel a lower sense of belonging when in the numerical minority in a workgroup. Gender composition also affected women?s confidence in their own math ability, as well as their group members? perceptions of their ability (Grover, Ito & Park, 2017).

Mechanisms through which belonging affects STEM achievement and representation were further examined in lab studies focused on the role of gender stereotypes on women?s interest in STEM (Ito & McPherson, 2018; McPherson, Park, & Ito, 2017; Stout, Grunberg, & Ito, 2016). These studies particularly highlight the impact of incongruity between women?s self-perceptions and their perceptions of people who pursues STEM.

Finally, a number of studies focused on intervening to change belonging. In the lab, we did this by exploring how the structure of a group activity influences men and women?s contributions, and consequently, their sense of belonging. In addition, in two large field studies, we examined the benefit of a brief, 15-min writing exercise designed to normalize questions of belonging and demonstrate to students that these doubts diminish. This intervention showed numerous promising findings such as increased belonging and self-efficacy, and higher course grades.


Last Modified: 10/31/2018
Modified by: Tiffany A Ito

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page