Award Abstract # 1737157
Institutional Transformation: Enhancing IUPUI STEM Curriculum through the Community-Engaged Learning and Ethical Reflection Framework (I-CELER)

NSF Org: SES
Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
Recipient: TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY
Initial Amendment Date: July 27, 2017
Latest Amendment Date: August 18, 2021
Award Number: 1737157
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: Frederick Kronz
fkronz@nsf.gov
 (703)292-7283
SES
 Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
SBE
 Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
Start Date: September 1, 2017
End Date: August 31, 2023 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $588,561.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $642,000.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2017 = $588,561.00
FY 2021 = $53,439.00
History of Investigator:
  • Kathy Johnson (Principal Investigator)
    kjohnso@iupui.edu
  • Brandon Sorge (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Martin Coleman (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Justin Hess (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Mary Price (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Julie Hatcher (Former Co-Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Indiana University
107 S INDIANA AVE
BLOOMINGTON
IN  US  47405-7000
(317)278-3473
Sponsor Congressional District: 09
Primary Place of Performance: Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis
420 University Blvd
Indianapolis
IN  US  46202-5147
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
07
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): YH86RTW2YVJ4
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): Cultivating Cultures of Ethica,
ER2-Ethical & Responsible Res
Primary Program Source: 01001718DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
01002122DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
Program Reference Code(s): 7699, 9179
Program Element Code(s): 019Y00, 129Y00
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.075

ABSTRACT

This project will facilitate and research the institutional transformation of two Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis (IUPUI) departments, Biomedical Engineering and Earth Sciences. Specifically, it will (i) promote the Integration of Community-Engaged Learning and Ethical Reflection (I-CELER) in these STEM curricula, (ii) explore the organizational impact of the project on institutional change, and (iii) analyze individual changes associated with students' and educators' ethical development. This project will increase faculty's ability to integrate philosophical reflection and community engagement within their departmental curriculum through their participation in Faculty Learning Community (FLC) meetings designed to explore the I-CELER framework. In turn, this will improve their undergraduate students' learning outcomes related to ethical development. Through a research to practice cycle, investigators will promote, explore, and iterate on techniques for embedding and teaching STEM ethics in community-engaged environments. This will provide the context in which undergraduates will design potential solutions, establish empathic relationships with community members, and simultaneously reflect upon the meanings and values affecting those relationships through the philosophical lenses of John Dewey's moral philosophy and an ethic of care. By integrating community-engaged ethical instruction into departmental curricula and investigating these effects, STEM ethics education at the investigators' institution will be infused with a new vitality leading to ethically-literate, civic-minded, and empathic cohorts of undergraduate students, educators who are confident about integrating ethics and community-engaged pedagogy in their courses, and transformed departments that incorporate ethics instruction throughout their curriculum.

At a theoretical level, this project will inform a largely lacking ontological discourse about the ethical development of STEM students and faculty. Many prominent pedagogies in STEM ethics focus on ethical reasoning or sensitivity of students, but rarely have scholars investigated how the enactment of care practices and an authentic engagement with diversity influences the ethical subjectivities of STEM students and educators. By utilizing the I-CELER framework, Earth Sciences and Biomedical Engineering faculty will integrate ethical reflection and community engagement in their courses, thereby transforming the way disciplinary ethics are taught across the curricula.

The project will be researched using a convergent mixed methods design and will use multiple surveys, including the DIT2 and the Civic-Minded Graduate and Professional scales, along with data derived from ethnographic methods. By situating this design within an educational research and practice cycle, annual research insights will improve the next year's intervention, which will inform refined questions and hypotheses. In sum, this project will create a tested model for transforming the teaching and learning of STEM ethics.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

(Showing: 1 - 10 of 17)
Fore, Grant and Wang, Lixin "The flow of care: Integrating an ethic of care and ethical reflection into a community-engaged hydrology course" , 2022 https://doi.org/10.1130/abs/2022am-379384 Citation Details
Licht, Kathy and Druschel, Gregory and Filippelli, Gabriel M. and Gilhooly, William and Rossbach, Thomas and Wang, Lixin and Coleman, Martin and Fore, Grant and Nyarko, Samuel and Price, Mary F. and Sanders, Elizabeth A. and Sorge, Brandon and Hess, Justi "Introducing ethics across the curriculum: A guide for geoscientists" , 2022 https://doi.org/10.1130/abs/2022am-381870 Citation Details
Hess, J. L. Lin "Testing the Civic-Minded Graduate Scale in Science and Engineering: Principal Component Analysis followed by Confirmatory Factor Analyses" International Journal of Engineering Education , v.37 , 2021 Citation Details
Sanders, Elizabeth A. and Hess, Justin L. and Fore, Grant and Price, Mary F. and Sorge, Brandon and Hahn, Tom and Coleman, Martin "Faculty Members' Conceptualizations of Ethics in the Biomedical Engineering Classroom" , 2021 https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637123 Citation Details
Fore, Grant and Licht, Kathy "Ethical reflection in a sedimentology course: Exploring ethical development through an ethic of care framework" , 2021 https://doi.org/10.1130/abs/2021AM-369324 Citation Details
Fore, Grant and Hess, Justin and Katz, Andrew "Ethics in Engineering or Engineering in Ethics?" , 2020 https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34590 Citation Details
Hess, Justin and Fore, Grant and Sorge, Brandon and Coleman, M and Price, Mary and Hahn, Thomas "Exploring Ethical Development from Standard Instruction in the Contexts of Biomedical Engineering and Earth Science" , 2019 https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32805 Citation Details
Fore, Grant and Hess, Justin and Sorge, Brandon and Price, Mary and Coleman, Martin and Hahn, Thomas and Hatcher, Julie "An Introduction to the Integrated Community-Engaged Learning and Ethical Reflection Framework (I-CELER)" , 2018 https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--2979 Citation Details
Hess, J. L. Chase "Quantifying interpersonal tendencies of engineering and science students: A validation study" International Journal of Engineering Education , v.34 , 2018 Citation Details
Miller, Sharon and Higbee, Steven and Wallace, Joseph and Schild, John and Ji, Julie "WIP: Embedded Ethical Inquiry and Reflection in a Biomedical Engineering Curriculum" ASEE Annual Conference & Expostion , 2020 https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--35536 Citation Details
Suppiger, Noelle and Tabassum, Nawshin and Miller, Sharon and Higbee, Steven "A study of biomedical engineering student critical reflection and ethical discussion around contemporary medical devices" International Journal of Ethics Education , 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-024-00183-3 Citation Details
(Showing: 1 - 10 of 17)

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page