News Release 05-010
Scientists Propose Sweeping Changes to Naming of Bird Neurosystems to Acknowledge Their True Brainpower
Researchers now see birds' cognitive ability as more comparable to mammals
January 31, 2005
This material is available primarily for archival purposes. Telephone numbers or other contact information may be out of date; please see current contact information at media contacts.
For sound bites, contact: Dena Headlee (703) 292-7739, firstname.lastname@example.org
ARLINGTON, Va.—Duke University neurobiologist Erich Jarvis and a team of 28 other neuroscientists have proposed sweeping changes to the terminology associated with the brain structures of birds--a century-old nomenclature the researchers consider outdated and irrelevant to birds' true brainpower.
The international research group concludes in a Feb. 2005, paper published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience that significant discoveries made over time reveal that birds are much closer to mammals in cognitive ability, and therefore, a new consistency in language will enhance studies of both.
In the journal's "Perspectives" column, authors describe a wide range of studies demonstrating that the so-called "primitive" regions of avian brains are actually sophisticated processing regions homologous to those in mammals. Those studies, which included tracing of neural pathways and behavior, showed that such avian brain regions carry out sensory processing, motor control and sensorimotor learning just as the mammalian neocortex. The scientists add that molecular studies reveal the avian and mammalian brain regions are comparable in their genetic and biochemical machinery.
In the same column, Jarvis and members of the Avian Brain Nomenclature Consortium reason that the old view of evolution in birds is no longer valid. Citing technical revisions to the nomenclature that were published in a May 2004, issue of the Journal of Comparative Neurology, consortium members assert in the new article that the old terminology--which implied that the avian brain was more primitive than the mammalian brain--has hindered scientific understanding.
"We believe that names have a powerful influence on the experiments we do and the way in which we think," wrote the authors of the new report. "Our current understanding of the avian brain requires a new terminology that better reflects these functions and the homologies between avian and mammalian brains."
The consortium's efforts were supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Lead author Jarvis organized the Duke conference in 2002 that brought together the many researchers in neuroscience and neuroanatomy to undertake discussions of the needed changes.
The group believed the previous terminology and associated concepts of how to define avian brain structure and avian brain evolution stymied efforts to directly link discoveries in the avian brain with those of other mammals. Jarvis, whose seminal work in vocal learning in birds garnered him $500,000 in 2002 as recipient of NSF's Waterman Award, acknowledged that the award came at a critical time in his work with the consortium.
"The impact of this work will go far beyond simple comparative anatomy," Jarvis said. "There is strong interest across neuroscience in using birds as models for learning and development, and migratory and social behavior."
The revision of the nomenclature for avian brains would replace a system developed in the 19th century by Ludwig Edinger, considered the father of comparative neuroanatomy. Edinger's system was based on a then-common practice of combining Darwin's recent theory of evolution and Aristotle's old concept that there exists a natural "scale" of creatures from lowest to highest. The prevailing views became that evolution was progressive from organisms with "lower" intelligence to those with "higher" intelligence and that evolution had a purpose--the generation of humans.
In the new view, the neocortex and related areas in the mammalian brain are derived from a region in the embryonic cerebrum called the pallium, or covering, a very different conclusion from Edinger's, which considered this region in the bird cerebrum part of the basal ganglia.
The consortium's work actually began in 1997, and was organized by Jarvis, Anton Reiner of the University of Tennessee Health Science Center in Memphis, Martin Wild of the University of Auckland in New Zealand, and other neurobiologists, who called themselves the "ThinkTank." Encouraging scientists to adjust their traditions and thinking based on new knowledge coming from the field had a rocky start, so the effort to change avian brain nomenclature turned into a seven-year project, with a steady add-on of new recruits. This effort culminated in the international scientific forum at Duke University in 2002, from which the new nomenclature was developed.
"We knew that we were doing something that may have an impact, not only on the immediate conduct of research in neuroscience, but on neuroscience for the next hundred years," said Jarvis. "And this nomenclature will help people understand that evolution has created more than one way to generate complex behavior--the mammal way and the bird way. And they're comparable to one another. In fact, some birds have evolved cognitive abilities that are far more complex than in many mammals."
International co-authors include:
Onur Güntürkün, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany,
András Csillag, Semmelweis University, Hungary,
Loreta Medina, University of Murcia, Spain,
George Paxinos, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Australia,
Martin Wild, University of Auckland, New Zealand,
Tom Smulders, University of Newcastle, United Kingdom
Co-authors from Duke University Medical Center include:
Lubica Kubikova, Connie Siang, Kazuhiro Wada and Jing Yu
Co-authors from other U.S. universities include:
Wayne Kuenzel, University Arkansas,
Diane Lee, California State University Long Beach,
Stephanie White, University of California, Los Angeles,
Harvey Karten, University of California, San Diego,
Georg Striedter, University of California at Irvine,
Jennifer Dugas-Ford, University of Chicago,
Laura Bruce, Creighton University School of Medicine,
Ann Butler, George Mason University,
Gregory F. Ball, Johns Hopkins University,
Sarah Durand, LaGuardia -CUNY,
Claudio Mello, Oregon Health & Science University,
Gerald Hough, Rowan University,
Toru Shimizu, University of South Florida,
Scott Husband, University of South Florida,
Alice Powers, St. John's University,
Keiko Yamamoto, University of Tennessee Health Science Center,
Anton Reiner, University of Tennessee Health Science Center,
David J. Perkel, University of Washington
- Dennis Meredith of the Duke University News Service contributed to this report.
For more information, see:
William C. Noxon, NSF, (703) 292-8070, email: email@example.com
Diane M. Witt, NSF, (703) 292-8423, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Erich Jarvis, Duke University, (919) 681-1680, email: email@example.com
The U.S. National Science Foundation propels the nation forward by advancing fundamental research in all fields of science and engineering. NSF supports research and people by providing facilities, instruments and funding to support their ingenuity and sustain the U.S. as a global leader in research and innovation. With a fiscal year 2021 budget of $8.5 billion, NSF funds reach all 50 states through grants to nearly 2,000 colleges, universities and institutions. Each year, NSF receives more than 40,000 competitive proposals and makes about 11,000 new awards. Those awards include support for cooperative research with industry, Arctic and Antarctic research and operations, and U.S. participation in international scientific efforts.