News Release 08-176
Health Standards Exceeded by Ozone Pollution in Wildfires
Ground-level ozone found to reach high levels in states like California, Nevada
October 9, 2008
This material is available primarily for archival purposes. Telephone numbers or other contact information may be out of date; please see current contact information at media contacts.
Wildfires can boost ozone pollution to levels that violate U.S. health standards, a new study concludes.
The research, by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo., focused on California wildfires in 2007, finding that they repeatedly caused ground-level ozone to spike to unhealthy levels across a broad area, including much of rural California as well as neighboring Nevada.
Results of the study are published today in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, published by the American Geophysical Union. The research was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), which sponsors NCAR, and by NASA.
"It's important to understand the health impacts of wildfires," says NCAR scientist Gabriele Pfister, the paper's lead author. "We found that ozone can hit unhealthy levels even in places where you are not seeing any smoke."
Although scientists have long known that wildfires can affect air quality by emitting particles and gases into the air, there has been little research to quantify the impacts.
Fires worsen ozone levels by releasing nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons, which can form ozone near the fire or far downwind as a result of chemical reactions in sunlight.
The researchers, using a combination of computer models and ground-level measurements, focused on intense California wildfires that broke out in September and October of 2007. They found that ozone was three times more likely to exceed safe levels when fire plumes blew into a region than when no plumes were present.
"Increasingly in the atmospheric sciences, the blending of model results and observations yield new insights into complex natural processes and societal impacts," said Cliff Jacobs, program director in NSF's Division of Atmospheric Sciences. "This study is an excellent example of this research paradigm."
At the time of the wildfires, the public health standard for ozone set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was 0.08 parts per million over an eight-hour period.
The EPA has since tightened the standard to 0.075 parts per million. Under the stricter standard, the number of violations would have nearly doubled.
While ozone in the stratosphere benefits life on Earth by blocking ultraviolet radiation from the Sun, ozone in the lower atmosphere can trigger a number of health problems.
These range from coughing and throat irritation to more serious problems, such as aggravation of asthma, bronchitis, and emphysema. Ground-level ozone pollution also damages crops and other plants.
"Wildfires are expected to worsen in the future, especially as our climate grows warmer," Pfister says. "But we are only now beginning to understand their potential impacts on people and ecosystems, not only nearby but also potentially far downwind."
The unhealthy levels of ozone the researchers detected occurred mostly in rural areas. That rural focus may be a result of the computer modeling, which lacked the fine detail to zoom in on relatively compact urban areas.
However, the authors also speculate that wildfire emissions have a greater impact on the countryside than on cities. The reason has to do with chemistry: cities tend to have higher levels of pollutants, and one of those pollutants, nitrogen dioxide, can, at high levels, reduce the efficiency with which ozone is produced and can even act to destroy ozone.
"The impact of wildfires on ozone in suburban and rural areas, far from urban sources of pollution, was quite notable," says NCAR scientist Christine Wiedinmyer, a co-author of the paper.
The paper notes that ozone levels would likely have been even greater except that Santa Ana winds in October blew wildfire plumes over the Pacific Ocean, safely away from populated areas.
To measure the impact of the fires on ozone formation, the researchers turned to computer models developed at NCAR.
Using a specialized fire model, they estimated the amount of vegetation burned and resulting emissions of nitrous oxides, sulfur dioxide, and other pollutants. Those results went into a global air chemistry model, which simulated the evolving chemistry and movement of the emissions and tracked the resulting formation of ozone as the fire plumes spread downwind.
The scientists compared their modeling results with ozone measurements from a network of EPA ground stations at various sites in California.
This enabled them to determine both the number of ozone violations and the extent to which the wildfires contributed to those violations.
Cheryl Dybas, NSF, (703) 292-7734, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
David Hosansky, NCAR, (303) 497-8611, email: email@example.com
Peter Weiss, American Geophysical Union, (202)777-7507, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
The U.S. National Science Foundation propels the nation forward by advancing fundamental research in all fields of science and engineering. NSF supports research and people by providing facilities, instruments and funding to support their ingenuity and sustain the U.S. as a global leader in research and innovation. With a fiscal year 2023 budget of $9.5 billion, NSF funds reach all 50 states through grants to nearly 2,000 colleges, universities and institutions. Each year, NSF receives more than 40,000 competitive proposals and makes about 11,000 new awards. Those awards include support for cooperative research with industry, Arctic and Antarctic research and operations, and U.S. participation in international scientific efforts.
Connect with us online
NSF website: nsf.gov
NSF News: nsf.gov/news
For News Media: nsf.gov/news/newsroom
Awards database: nsf.gov/awardsearch/
Follow us on social
Facebook: facebook.com/US.NSF Instagram: instagram.com/nsfgov