News Release 12-118
Provocative Prescription for Chemical Evolution in Plants
Researchers speculate "specialized metabolism" was key to terrestrial takeover of plants
Researchers: Primary metabolism likely arose from promiscuous primeval metabolic reactions.
June 28, 2012
This material is available primarily for archival purposes. Telephone numbers or other contact information may be out of date; please see current contact information at media contacts.
"Plants produce a repository of structurally diverse chemicals ..." That's how a new paper begins that proposes some provocative ideas about how plants developed the wide assortment of chemicals they use to sustain life and how they developed other chemicals that may or may not contribute to their immediate survival, but instead often ensure reproductive success in changing, earth environments.
In a June 29 journal Science review paper, Joseph P. Noel, a lead investigator at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and colleagues speculate that plant chemodiversity results from rapid and sometimes unanticipated evolutionary steps.
Noel, along with Jing-Ke Weng and Ryan Philippe also with the Salk Institute, theorize that a very early form of chemical reactions that occurred in the prebiotic soup paved the way for production of chemicals important to the survival of the earliest cellular organisms--chemicals including those essential for building nucleic acids--biological molecules such as DNA, RNA and proteins necessary for encoding, transmitting and expressing genetic information.
The researchers speculate these chemical processes, now catalytically robust, evolved into separate pathways both in early plants and in their aquatic ancestors.
One pathway--having chemical processes termed primary metabolism--allowed the production of life-sustaining chemicals.
The other pathway produced chemicals that no longer carry life sustaining functions. Instead, these chemicals have more subtle effects on plants' fitness, or reproductive success in their local environments.
In the paper, the researchers hypothesize these secondary chemical processes arose from the more conserved, life-sustaining processes and term them "specialized metabolism."
"Understanding how plants evolved their ability to synthesize secondary metabolites--such a vast and diverse array of chemicals--is a challenging problem," said Parag Chitnis, director of NSF's Division of Molecular & Cellular Biosciences, which funded Noel's research. "In this article, Dr. Noel and his colleagues present an attractive and plausible explanation."
Noel, Weng and Philippe speculate that specialized metabolism is more malleable than life-sustaining metabolic processes, and that specialized metabolic systems can evolve rapidly to produce new "tailor-made molecules" as means to adapt to ever-changing environments.
"Primary metabolism likely arose from promiscuous primeval metabolic reactions and evolved toward greater catalytic precision and efficiency," the researchers write in their article. "Specialized metabolism likely emerged from primary metabolism."
According to the researchers, specialized metabolism likely permitted more and varied chemical reactions and natural products because the enzymes responsible for their synthesis were more flexible in ways scientists are only now beginning to understand at the molecular level.
The upshot was the emergence of secondary chemical reactions that produce color in flowers; rubber for vehicle tires; flavor, smells, nutrition and browning in fruits and wine; natural plant antibiotics; fragrances to attract pollinators and repel herbivores, and even the characteristic aroma and flavor of the cabbage and tomato families.
"Plant secondary metabolism generates a huge diversity of chemicals that are not only very important to the plant, but also for humans," said Greg Warr, a program manager in NSF's Division of Molecular & Cellular Biosciences. "For example, we often depend on plant products for nutrition, fuel, biorenewable chemicals, clothing, shelter and pharmaceuticals."
What's more, Noel and colleagues speculate the depth of specialized metabolism likely mirrored the takeover of Earth by plants that form the essential core of the global food network. As primary metabolism produced life-sustaining chemical reactions, specialized metabolism gave rise to secondary chemical reactions that allowed plants to adapt to geographically dispersed environments, many of which are challenging to other forms of life.
For example, some metabolites, plant hormones regulate various aspects of plant growth and development in response to environmental cues, while others act as ultraviolet sunscreens and prevent dehydration.
"The ability of these complex biological systems in plants to evolve quickly to solve problems of plant survival and reproduction, will ultimately teach us the lessons learned over a 500 million year old experiment plants have been conducting since the dawn of terrestrial life," said Noel.
"Without this ongoing experiment, humankind and all the animal life we know of on the terrestrial earth would cease to exist."
The researchers hope the Science review paper will help provide a provocative and more informed set of hypotheses regarding the amazing tapestry of plant chemistry while also posing still unanswered but fundamental problems to life. "It will certainly guide future research in this important area," said Chitnis.
-NSF-
-
Study provides unanticipated clues about the rules governing the evolution of plant metabolism.
Credit and Larger Version -
The researchers' work is described in the June 29, 2012 issue of the journal Science.
Credit and Larger Version
Media Contacts
Bobbie Mixon, NSF, (703) 292-8485, email: bmixon@nsf.gov
Program Contacts
Gregory Warr, NSF, (703) 292-8440, email: gwarr@nsf.gov
Parag R. Chitnis, NSF, (703) 292-8440, email: pchitnis@nsf.gov
Principal Investigators
Joseph P. Noel, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, (858) 453-4100, email: noel@salk.edu
Co-Investigators
Jing-Ke Weng, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, (858) 453-4100, email: wengj@salk.edu
The U.S. National Science Foundation propels the nation forward by advancing fundamental research in all fields of science and engineering. NSF supports research and people by providing facilities, instruments and funding to support their ingenuity and sustain the U.S. as a global leader in research and innovation. With a fiscal year 2023 budget of $9.5 billion, NSF funds reach all 50 states through grants to nearly 2,000 colleges, universities and institutions. Each year, NSF receives more than 40,000 competitive proposals and makes about 11,000 new awards. Those awards include support for cooperative research with industry, Arctic and Antarctic research and operations, and U.S. participation in international scientific efforts.
Connect with us online
NSF website: nsf.gov
NSF News: nsf.gov/news
For News Media: nsf.gov/news/newsroom
Statistics: nsf.gov/statistics/
Awards database: nsf.gov/awardsearch/
Follow us on social
Twitter: twitter.com/NSF
Facebook: facebook.com/US.NSF
Instagram: instagram.com/nsfgov