Skip to main content
Email Print Share

News Release 13-004

Marginal Lands Are Prime Fuel Source for Alternative Energy

Lands unsuited for food crops represent huge untapped resource to grow mixed species biomass for ethanol

Bales of cellulosic biomass.

Bales of cellulosic biomass: Marginal lands may be a prime source for alternative energy.
Credit and Larger Version

January 16, 2013

Marginal lands--those unsuited for food crops--can serve as prime real estate for meeting the nation's alternative energy production goals.

In the current issue of the journal Nature, scientists at Michigan State University (MSU) and other institutions show that marginal lands are a huge untapped resource for growing mixed-species cellulosic biomass.

These lands could annually produce up to 5.5 billion gallons of ethanol in the Midwest alone.

Cellulosic ethanol is a biofuel produced from wood, grasses or the inedible parts of plants.

"Understanding the environmental impact of widespread biofuel production is a major unanswered question in the U.S. and worldwide," said Ilya Gelfand, lead author of the paper.

"We estimate that using marginal lands for growing cellulosic biomass crops could provide up to 215 gallons of ethanol per acre with substantial greenhouse gas mitigation."

The notion of making better use of marginal lands has been around for nearly 15 years.

However, this is the first study to provide an estimate for greenhouse gas benefits, and an assessment of the total potential of these lands to produce significant amounts of biomass, Gelfand said.

Focusing on 10 midwestern states, researchers from MSU, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and the University of Maryland used 20 years of data from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) site.

Kellogg Biological Station is one of 26 such NSF LTER sites in ecosystems around the world from grasslands to deserts, coral reefs to tundra.

"The study underscores the critical role that long-term basic research plays in determining the optimum balance between economic prosperity and environmental sustainability," said Saran Twombly, program director in NSF's Division of Environmental Biology.

"Long-term basic experiments suggest that wise management of marginal lands, rather than wholesale conversion of valuable agricultural lands, could contribute significantly to a sustainable future," Twombly said.

The scientists characterized the comparative productivity and greenhouse gas impacts of different crops, including corn, poplar, alfalfa and old-field vegetation.

They then used a supercomputer to identify and model biomass production that could grow enough feedstock to support a local biorefinery with a capacity of at least 24 million gallons per year.

The final tally of 5.5 billion gallons of ethanol represents about 25 percent of Congress' 2022 cellulosic biofuels target, said Phil Robertson, co-author of the paper and director of the KBS LTER site.

"The value of marginal lands for energy production has been long-speculated and often discounted," he said.

"This research shows that these lands could make a major contribution to transportation energy needs, while providing substantial climate and--if managed properly--conservation benefits."

This is also the first study to demonstrate that grasses and other non-woody plants that grow naturally on unmanaged lands are sufficiently productive to make ethanol production worthwhile, he said.

Conservative numbers were used in the study, the scientists said, and production efficiency could be increased by carefully selecting the mix of plant species.

Additional benefits of using marginal lands include:

  • New revenue for farmers and other land owners;
  • No food-vs.-fuel conflict, as food production would not be displaced by fuel production;
  • No indirect land-use effects, where land in another part of the globe is cleared to replace land lost to food production; and
  • No carbon debt from land conversion, if existing vegetation is used or if new perennial crops are planted directly in existing vegetation.

The research was also funded by the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center and MSU AgBioResearch.


Media Contacts
Cheryl Dybas, NSF, (703) 292-7734,
Layne Cameron, MSU, (765) 748-4827,

Related Websites
NSF Long-Term Ecological Research Network:
NSF Kellogg Biological Station LTER Site:
NSF News Release: Scientists Develop New Carbon Accounting Method to Reduce Farmers' Use of Nitrogen Fertilizer:
NSF LTER Discovery Articles Series:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal agency that supports fundamental research and education across all fields of science and engineering. In fiscal year (FY) 2016, its budget is $7.5 billion. NSF funds reach all 50 states through grants to nearly 2,000 colleges, universities and other institutions. Each year, NSF receives more than 48,000 competitive proposals for funding and makes about 12,000 new funding awards. NSF also awards about $626 million in professional and service contracts yearly.

 Get News Updates by Email 

Useful NSF Web Sites:
NSF Home Page:
NSF News:
For the News Media:
Science and Engineering Statistics:
Awards Searches:


Map of North America showing NSF's Long-Term Ecological Research Network.
NSF's Long-Term Ecological Research Network comprises 26 land, coastal and ocean sites.
Credit and Larger Version

NSF KBS LTER site experimental plot with corn and hybrid poplar
NSF KBS LTER site experimental plots: Corn and hybrid poplar are in the background.
Credit and Larger Version

Green corn plants at the KBS LTER site
Corn at the KBS LTER site: Corn currently dominates biofuel production in the U.S.
Credit and Larger Version

Researchers collecting soil cores to determine carbon storage at the LTER site.
Researchers collect soil cores to determine carbon storage at the LTER site.
Credit and Larger Version

Satellite view of the cropping systems experiment.
Satellite view of the cropping systems experiment: Each rectangle is 2.5 acres.
Credit and Larger Version