SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS
Each year, independent external experts review approximately one-third
of NSF’s programs. In FY 1999, NSF’s activities were organized into nearly
200 programs. Approximately 40% of NSF’s program activities were evaluated
in FY 1999 by external committees such as committees of visitors (COVs)
and advisory committees (ACs). In addition to the reviews and assessments
by COVs and ACs, further evaluations of programs are carried out by independent
contractors to address issues specific to those programs.
Approximately 40% of NSF’s program
activities were evaluated in FY 1999 by external committees such as
committees of visitors (COVs) and advisory committees (ACs). |
In FY 1999, a total of 18 committees of visitors (COVs) met to conduct
reviews of 82 programs, producing a total of 43 COV reports assessing
the quality of program performance and outcome results. The number of
COV reports is greater than the number of COVs because the COVs were organized
into subgroups to produce reports covering more than one program. Eight
advisory committees met in early FY 2000 to review the work of the COVs
and provide additional assessment.
The COVs assess the programs for integrity and efficiency of process
and management; quality of science; quality of outputs and outcomes; and
implementation and use of merit review criteria, covering a three-year
period. This assessment specifically addresses the performance of NSF
programs with respect to the outcome goals, the Government-wide goal on
the balance of innovative, risky, and interdisciplinary research; and
on the NSF goal relevant to the implementation of the new merit review
criteria. The program assessments reported by COVs are reviewed and approved
by external advisory committees.
Table 1 summarizes the program assessments and evaluations that were
completed in FY 1999 in addition to the assessments carried out by the
COVs and the advisory committees. The National Science Board also commissioned
a study by the Fleet Review Committee, to report to NSF on the Academic
Research Fleet. The committee was asked to review and evaluate the current
and projected research vessel fleet within a national framework, to review
the overall management structure and existing capabilities, and review
possible changes to ensure optimal operations.
Program Assessments and Evaluations Completed in FY 1999
Table 1
Program
|
Scope
|
Methodology
|
Goals Addressed
|
Graduate Research Fellowships (GRF) Program
|
Determine program effectiveness and participant academic and professional
achievement.
|
External review by independent contractor
|
Goal 3
|
Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER)
|
Determine use of funds by recipients; document recipients’ histories
and outcomes; determine value of award within department; determine
NSF’s effectiveness in implementing and managing the program.
|
External review by independent contractor
|
Goal 3
|
Presidential Faculty Fellows Program (PFF)
|
Determine utility of data from PFF web sites and annual reports
|
External review by independent contractor
|
Goal 3
|
Instructional Materials Development (IMD) Program
|
Determine quality and use of IMD products in classrooms
|
External review by independent contractor
|
Goal 4
|
Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR)
|
Determine whether participants increased their share of federal
academic research funds from 1980-1994; Identify program strategies
responsible for improving participant competitiveness
|
External review by independent contractor
|
Goals 1-4
|
|
GPRA Performance Report Home
NSF
Vision
Director's
Statement
Executive
Summary
Summary of Performance
Goals and Results
Summary of Assessment
and Evaluation Process
Summary of Findings
from Program Assessments and Evaluations
|