| ||||||||

References
Ball, D.L., and Cohen, D.K. (1996).
Reform by the book: What is – or might be – the
role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and
instructional reform. Educational
Researcher, 25 (9), 6-8, 14.
Barnett, C. (1991). Building a case-based
curriculum to enhance the pedagogical content knowledge of
mathematics teachers. Journal
of Teacher Education, 42, 263-272.
Barnett, C. (1998). Mathematics teaching
cases as a catalyst for informed strategic inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14 (1), 81-93.
Barnett, C., and Friedman, S. (1997).
Mathematics case discussions: Nothing is sacred. In E. Fennema,
& B.S. Nelson, (Eds.). Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 381-399). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Barnett, C., Goldenstein, D., and
Jackson, B. (Eds.). (1994a). Fractions, decimals, ratios & percents:
Hard to teach and hard to learn? Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Barnett, C., Goldenstein, D., and
Jackson, B. (Eds.). (1994b). Fractions, decimals, ratios & percents:
Hard to teach and hard to learn? Facilitators’ guide. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Barnett, C., and Ramirez, A. (1996).
Fostering critical analysis and reflection through mathematics
case discussions. In J. Colbert, P. Desberg., & K. Trimble,
(Eds.), The case for
education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp. 1-13). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn
& Bacon.
Barnett, C., and Tyson, P. (1993a). Case methods and teacher change:
Shifting authority to build authority. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
Barnett, C., and Tyson, P. (1993b). Mathematics teaching cases as a
catalyst for informed strategic inquiry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
American Educational research Association, Atlanta, GA.
Bloome, D., and Egan-Robertson, A.
(1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom
reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28 (4), 305-333.
Borasi, R. (1994a). Developing area
formulas: An opportunity for inquiry within the traditional
math curriculum. Goals, overview and ideas for planning the
unit. Unpublished document.
Borasi, R. (1994b). Developing area
formulas: An opportunity for inquiry within the traditional
math curriculum. Detailed reports of three classroom
implementations. Unpublished document.
Borasi, R. (1995) What secondary
mathematics students can do. In I. Carl, (Ed.), Seventy-five years of progress:
Prospects for school mathematics (pp.43-61).
Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Borasi, R. (1996). Reconceiving mathematics instruction: A
focus on errors. Norwood, NJ:
Ablex.
Borasi, R., and Fonzi, J. (in
preparation). Introducing
math teachers to inquiry: A framework and supporting materials
for teacher educators.
Borasi, R., Fonzi, J., Smith, C., and
Rose, B. (1999). Beginning the process of rethinking
mathematics instruction: A professional development program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher
Education.
Borasi, R., and Siegel, M. (1992).
Reading, writing and mathematics: Rethinking the basics and
their relationship. Subplenary lecture delivered at the
International Congress in Mathematics Education, Quebec City,
Quebec, Canada.
Borasi, R., and Siegel, M. (2000). Reading counts: Expanding the role of
reading in mathematics classrooms.
New York: Teachers College Press.
Borasi, R., and Smith, K. (1995).
Developing area formulas: An opportunity for inquiry within the
traditional math curriculum. In-depth story of a classroom
experience. Unpublished document.
Bright, G.W., and Joyner, J.M. (Eds.).
(1998). Classroom
assessment in mathematics: Views from a National Science
Foundation working conference. New
York: University Press of America.
Brooks, J.G., and Brooks, M.G. (1999). The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision
and Curriculum Development.
Brown, S.I. (1982). On humanistic
alternatives on the practice of teacher education. Journal of Research and Development in
Education, 15(4), 1-12.
Calhoun, E.F. (1993). Action research:
Three approaches. Educational
Leadership 51(2), 62-65.
Callard, C. (2001). An in-depth look at students’ learning
in an eighth grade mathematics classroom informed by an inquiry
approach. Unpublished Ed.D.
dissertation. University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Carpenter, T.P., and Fennema, E. (1992).
Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of
students and teachers. International
Journal of Educational Research,
17, 457-470.
Carpenter, T.P., Fennema, E., and Franke,
M.L. (1994). Children’s
thinking about whole numbers.
Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
Chipman, S.F., and Thomas, V.G. (1987).
The participation of women and minorities in mathematical,
scientific and technical fields. In E.Z.Rothkopt (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol.14, pp.387-430). Washington, DC:
American Educational Research Association.
Clarke, D. (1994). Ten key principles
from research for the professional development of mathematics
teachers. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), NCTM Yearbook, Professional
development for teachers of mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics, Inc.
Collins, A., Brown, J.S., and Newman,
S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of
reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction :
Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp.
453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Confrey, J. (1991). Learning to listen: A
student’s understanding of powers of ten. In E. von
Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical
constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 111-138). Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Corwin, R.B., Price, S.L., and
Storeygard, J. (1996). Talking
mathematics: Resources for developing professionals. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher
learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5).
Davis, R.B., Maher, C.A., and Noddings,
N. (Eds.). (1990). Constructivists
views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics
Dunham, P.H., and Dick, T.P. (1994).
Research on graphing calculators. Mathematics Teacher, 87, 440-445.
Eisenhower Clearinghouse for Mathematics
and Science Education (ENC) (2000). Ideas that work: Mathematics professional
development. Columbus, OH: ENC.
Farrell, A.M. (1994). Industry
internships and professional development. In D.B. Aichele &
A.F. Coxford, (Eds.), Professional
development for teachers of mathematics (pp.276-285). Reston, VA: National Council of
Teachers of Mathematics.
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T.P., and Franke,
M.L. (1997). Cognitively guided instruction (CGI). In S.N.
Friel, & G.W. Bright, (Eds.), Reflecting on our work: NSF teacher
enhancement in K-6 mathematics (pp.
193-196). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T.P., Franke,
M.L., and Carey, D.A. (1992). Learning to use children’s
mathematical thinking: A case study. In R. Davis, & C.
Maher, (Eds.), Schools,
mathematics and the world of reality. Needham Height, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T.P., Franke,
M.L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V.A., and Empson, S.B. (1996). A
longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking
in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education. 27(4), 403-434.
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T.P., Levi, L.,
Franke, M.L., and Empson, S.B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively
Guided Instruction. Professional development materials. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Fennema, E., and Franke, M.L. (1992).
Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In Douglas A.
Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of
research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). NY: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Fennema, E., Franke, M.L., Carpenter,
T.P., and Carey, D.A. (1993). Using children’s knowledge
in instruction. American
Educational Research Journal.
30(3), 403-434.
Fennema, E., and Nelson, B.S. (Eds.).
(1997). Mathematics
teachers in transition. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Ferrini-Mundy, J. (1997). Reform efforts
in mathematics education: Reckoning with reality. In S.N. Friel
& G.W. Bright (Eds.), Reflecting on our work: NSF teacher
enhancement in K-6 mathematics (pp.
113-132). New York: University Press of America.
Fonzi, J., and Borasi, R. (2000). Orchestrating math experiences for
teachers (videotape +
facilitator’s guide) (available by the authors).
Fonzi, J., and Borasi, R. (2000). Promoting focused reflections on
learning experiences (videotape
+ facilitator’s guide) (available by the authors).
Fonzi, J., and Borasi, R. (2000). Providing in-class support (videotape + facilitator’s guide)
(available by the authors).
Fonzi, J., and Borasi, R. (2000). Debriefing classroom observations (videotape + facilitator’s guide)
(available by the authors).
Fonzi, J., and Rose, B. (1995a). Investigating tessellations to learn
geometry. Goals, overview and ideas for planning the unit. Unpublished document.
Fonzi, J., and Rose, B. (1995b). Investigating tessellations to learn
geometry. Detailed reports of three classroom implementations. Unpublished document.
Fosnot, C.T. (Ed.). (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives,
and practice. New York: Teachers
College Press.
Friel, S.N., and Bright, G.W. (Eds.).
(1997). Reflecting on our
work: NSF teacher enhancement in K-6 mathematics. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Fuson, K. (1992). Research on whole
number addition and subtraction. In Grouws, D. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics
teaching and learning (pp.
243-275). New York: Macmillan.
Gearhart, M., Saxe, G.B., and Stipek, D.
(1995). Helping teachers know more about their students:
Findings from the Integrated Mathematics Assessment (IMA)
project. Connections (1), 4-6, 10.
Gordon, A., and Heller,
J. (1995). Traversing the web: Pedagogical reasoning
among new and continuing case methods participants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Continued | ||||||||

| ||||||||

APPENDIX