- WITHDRAWALS
A proposal may be withdrawn at any time before a funding recommendation is made by the
cognizant NSF Program Officer. Proposals must be electronically withdrawn via the FastLane
Electronic Proposal Withdrawal System. This module in Fastlane automates the proposal
withdrawal process and provides a mechanism that will help organizations to more effectively
manage their proposal portfolio, as well as to help eliminate the submission of duplicate
proposals to NSF. The Electronic Proposal Withdrawal System includes three processes:
- Principal Investigator's Proposal Withdrawal allows a PI to initiate a proposal withdrawal and forward it to the organization's sponsored projects office (or equivalent) for submission to NSF.
- Sponsored Projects Office (SPO) Proposal Withdrawal allows an authorized individual in the organization's sponsored projects office (or equivalent) to initiate a proposal withdrawal for submission to NSF.
- Proposal Submission Duplicate Withdrawal prevents a SPO official from submitting a new proposal if a duplicate (a proposal from the same organization with the same title and same PI and co-PIs) already has been submitted to NSF within the last two weeks prior to the current submission. If these conditions are met, the system will allow the authorized SPO official to either withdraw the previous duplicate and then proceed with the submission of the new proposal, or to modify the new proposal so it is different from the previous proposal.
Principal Investigators can access the Proposal Withdrawal utility via the "Submitted
Proposals" screen under the FastLane Proposal Preparation Functions module.
36 Authorized
individuals in the organization's sponsored projects office (or equivalent) can initiate or
review a proposal withdrawal using the "Submit Proposals/Supplements/File Updates/Withdrawals"
module via the FastLane "Research Administration Functions".
37
In cases where NSF already has made a funding decision, proposals will not be permitted to
be withdrawn via the electronic proposal withdrawal system. When a PI or SPO representative
attempts to prepare a proposal withdrawal for such a proposal, a message will be displayed to
contact the cognizant NSF Program Officer for further assistance.
NSF must be notified if any funding for the proposed project is received from another source or sponsor. If it is brought to NSF's attention that funding for a proposal to NSF has been accepted from another sponsor, NSF will send a withdrawal confirmation to the PI and the SPO without waiting for the official withdrawal notification.
If a proposal withdrawal is submitted for a proposal that is part of a collaborative effort,
regardless of whether the organization is the lead or non-lead, the electronic proposal
withdrawal system will withdraw that proposal along with the other remaining proposals that are
identified as part of the collaborative effort. If the remaining organizations in the
collaborative determine that the project can still proceed, a new collaborative proposal must
be submitted.
Copies of reviews received by NSF before a proposal is withdrawn will be provided to the
PI. NSF provides notice of a withdrawal, return, declination, or reconsideration to both the
PI and the SPO.
- RETURN WITHOUT REVIEW
Proposals may not be considered by NSF for the following reasons.
The proposal:
1. is inappropriate for funding by the National Science Foundation;
2. is submitted with insufficient lead-time before the activity is scheduled to begin;
3. is a full proposal that was submitted by a proposer that has received a "not invited" response to the submission of a preliminary proposal;
4. is a duplicate of, or substantially similar to, a proposal already under consideration by NSF from the same submitter;
5. does not meet NSF proposal preparation requirements, such as page limitations,
formatting instructions, and electronic submission, as specified in the Grant Proposal Guide or program solicitation
38 ;)
6. is not responsive to the GPG or program announcement/solicitation;
7. does not meet an announced proposal deadline date (and time, where specified); or
8. was previously reviewed and declined and has not been substantially revised.
- DECLINATIONS
A PI whose proposal for NSF support has been declined generally will receive information and an explanation of the reason(s) for declination (via paper or e-mail form) along with copies of the reviews considered in making the decision. If that explanation does not satisfy the PI, he/she may request additional information from the cognizant NSF Program Officer or Division Director.
- RECONSIDERATION
If the explanation provided does not satisfy the PI, he/she may request that the cognizant
NSF Assistant Director or Office Head reconsider the action to determine whether the proposal
received a fair and reasonable review, both substantively and procedurally. A PI whose
proposal has not been accepted because it is inappropriate for consideration by NSF also may
request reconsideration of this determination. The request for reconsideration must be in
writing and must be received within 90 days after the date of the declination letter or return.
If the proposing organization is still not satisfied after reconsideration by the responsible
Assistant Director/Office Head, it may, within 60 days after the determination by the Assistant
Director/Office Head, request further reconsideration by the NSF Deputy Director. Consult
GPM
Section 900 for additional information on the NSF reconsideration process, including the
categories of actions that are subject to the NSF reconsideration policy.
- RESUBMISSION
A declined proposal may be resubmitted, but only after it has undergone substantial revision. Resubmittals that have not clearly taken into account the major comments or concerns resulting from the prior NSF review may be returned without review. The Foundation will treat the revised proposal as a new proposal, subject to the standard review procedures.