Chapter V - Allowability of Costs
Expenditures under NSF cost reimbursement grants are governed by the Federal cost principles and must conform with NSF policies, grant special provisions and grantee internal policies. While grantees are encouraged to seek advice regarding the treatment of costs from the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer identified in the award notice, it is the grantee organization that is ultimately responsible for ensuring that all costs charged to NSF awards meet the requirements of the applicable cost principles, grant general terms and conditions, and any other specific requirements of both the award notice and the applicable program solicitation. In addition, grantee organizations should ensure that their own internal policies and procedures and other requirements are met for all charges to NSF awards. Otherwise such costs may be disallowed during audit resolution or by specific determination of an NSF Grants and Agreement Officer.
In the event a grantee anticipates charging an item of direct cost that might subsequently be disputed, an authorized official of the grantee organization should discuss the matter with the cognizant NSF Grants and Agreements Officer and document the conditions or factors surrounding the item in order to avoid possible subsequent disallowance. If the NSF Grant and Agreement Officer determines that such costs are appropriate considering the special requirements of a particular NSF sponsored activity, this should be documented through an advanced agreement or understanding. Advance agreements regarding the treatment of such costs may be incorporated by specific language in the award notice, or by other written correspondence.
The governing Federal cost principles applicable to specific types of grantees are as follows:
Type of Organization
Applicable Federal Cost Principles
2 CFR §220 (OMB Circular A-21)
2 CFR §230 (OMB Circular A-122)
2 CFR §225 (OMB Circular A-87)
Grantees are responsible for assuring that costs of all subawardees under NSF grants are subject to those cost principles and procedures appropriate to the subaward type and organization involved as identified above as well as meet all the requirements specified in this Chapter.
In the event of any discrepancy between the summary information contained in this chapter and any specific provision of the applicable Federal cost principles, the cost principles in effect as of the effective date of the NSF grant will govern. In the case of a discrepancy between the special provisions of an NSF grant and the standards of the applicable cost principles, the special provisions of the grant will govern.
The maximum obligation of NSF for support of the project will not exceed the amount specified in the grant, as amended. NSF does not amend grants to provide additional funds for such purposes as reimbursement for unrecovered indirect costs resulting from the establishment of final negotiated rates or for increases in salaries, fringe benefits and other costs.
(i) Grantees may incur allowable pre-award costs within the 90 day period immediately preceding the effective date of the grant providing:
(a) the approval of pre-award spending is made and documented in accordance with the grantee's procedures; and
(b) the advanced funding is necessary for the effective and economical conduct of the project.
(ii) Pre-award expenditures are made at the grantee's risk. Grantee authority to approve pre-award costs does not impose an obligation on NSF: (1) in the absence of appropriations; (2) if an award is not subsequently made; or (3) if an award is made for a lesser amount than the grantee anticipated.
(iii) Requests for pre-award costs for periods exceeding 90 days must be submitted electronically via use of the Notification and Request module in FastLane. Pre-award expenditures prior to funding of an increment within a continuing grant are not subject to this limitation or approval requirement, but are subject to paragraph (ii). above.
NSF funds may not be expended subsequent to the expiration date of the grant except to liquidate valid commitments that were made on or before the expiration date, e.g., commitment of project funds for subcontractor costs for services rendered during that award period but not billed to the grantee until after the grant expired. (See AAG Chapter III.E.2.) The costs of equipment or materials and supplies ordered after the expiration date, may not be charged to the project.
In addition, grantee should not purchase items of equipment, computing devices, or restock materials and supplies in anticipation of grant expiration where there is little or no time left for such items to be utilized in the actual conduct of the research.
NSF has waived most cost related and administrative prior approvals required by 2 CFR §220 (OMB Circular A-21) and 2 CFR §215. Grantees should refer to the general conditions referenced in the grant, and AAG Exhibit II-1 for information on NSF required prior approvals.
(i) The funding of items identified in the budget constitutes NSF’s authorization for the grantee to incur these costs, provided there is not a specific limitation in the grant language and the costs are otherwise allowable, allocable, and reasonable in accordance with the cost principles. However, grantees should ensure that all costs are fully disclosed in the budget justification.
(ii) Costs not specifically budgeted in an NSF award may be allowable provided that prior approval is not required and costs are incurred consistently with the applicable cost principles and the grantee’s written policies and procedures, and proper documentation to support the charge to an NSF grant is maintained.
The following subsections summarize the allowability of frequently encountered direct cost items:
(i) All Grantees. All remuneration paid currently or accrued by the organization for employees working on the NSF-supported project during the grant period is allowable to the extent that:
(a) total compensation to individual employees is reasonable for the work performed and conforms to the established policy of the organization consistently applied to both government and non-government activities; and
(b) the charges for work performed directly under NSF grants and for other work allocable as indirect costs are determined and documented as provided in the applicable Federal cost principles.
(ii) Colleges and Universities. Section J.10 of 2 CFR §220 (OMB Circular A-21) establishes criteria for compensation for work performed on government projects by faculty members during and outside the academic year. In addition, the following requirements also apply based on NSF’s policy for faculty at academic institutions:
(a) Senior Project Personnel Salaries & Wages Policies
In accordance with GPG Chapter II.C.2.g, NSF normally limits salary compensation for senior project personnel on awards made by the Foundation, to no more than two months of their regular salary in any one year. This limit includes salary received from all NSF funded grants. Salary is to be paid at a monthly rate not in excess of the base salary divided by the number of months in the period for which the base salary is paid. As such, proposal budgets submitted should not request, and NSF-approved budgets will not include, funding for an individual investigator or co-principal investigator which exceeds two months of their regular year salary. If anticipated, any compensation for such personnel in excess of two months must be disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and must be specifically approved by NSF in the award notice.
NSF award funds may not be used to augment the total salary or salary rate of faculty members during the period covered by the term of faculty appointment or to reimburse faculty members for consulting or other time in addition to a regular full-time organizational salary covering the same general period of employment. Exceptions may be considered under certain NSF grants for teaching weekend and evening classes or working at remote locations such as ship operations, certain large research facilities with limited access and field research sites. If anticipated, any intent to provide salary compensation above the base salary must be disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and must be specifically approved by NSF in the award notice.
(b) Administrative and Clerical Salaries & Wages Policies
In most circumstances, particularly for institutions of higher education, salaries of administrative or clerical staff are included as part of indirect costs (also known as Facilities and Administrative Costs (F&A) for Colleges and Universities). Salaries of administrative or clerical staff may be requested as direct costs for a project requiring an extensive amount of administrative or clerical support and where these costs can be readily and specifically identified with the project with a high degree of accuracy. Salaries for administrative or clerical staff shall be budgeted as a direct cost only if this type of cost is consistently treated as a direct cost in like circumstances for all other projects and cost objectives. The circumstances for requiring direct charging of these services must be clearly described in the budget justification. Such costs, if not clearly justified, may be deleted by NSF. See 2 CFR §220 (OMB Circular A-21), for examples of where direct charging of administrative salaries may be appropriate.
Fringe benefits are allowable as a direct cost (if not included as an indirect cost) in proportion to the salary charged to the grant, to the extent that such payments are made under formally established and consistently applied organizational policies. Fringe benefits that are not accrued but are charged as direct costs and incurred under "pay as you go plans" may be subject to reasonableness determination where the benefits are earned under other work and charged to the last activity the employee was working on. This is of particular concern for large lump sum payments for leave, disability, pregnancy or other employee fringe benefits.
Additional NSF guidelines on equipment are found in AAG Chapter IV.E.
(i) ACQUISITION COST OF EQUIPMENT - the net invoice price of the equipment, including the cost of modifications, attachments, accessories or auxiliary apparatus necessary to make the property usable for the purpose for which it was acquired. Other charges, such as the cost of installation, transportation, taxes, duty or protective in-transit insurance, should be included in the unit acquisition cost consistent with the grantee’s regular accounting practices.
(ii) EQUIPMENT - tangible nonexpendable personal property including exempt property charged directly to the grant having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit. However, consistent with grantee policy, lower limits may be established
(iii) GENERAL PURPOSE EQUIPMENT - permanent equipment (as defined in b., above) that is usable for other than research, medical, scientific or technical activities, whether or not special modifications are needed to make it suitable for a particular purpose. Examples of general purpose equipment include office equipment and furnishings, air conditioning equipment, reproduction and printing equipment, motor vehicles and personal computer equipment.
(iv) SPECIAL PURPOSE EQUIPMENT - permanent equipment (as defined in b., above) which is usable only for research, medical, scientific or technical activities. Examples of special purpose equipment include microscopes, x-ray machines, specialized drilling equipment, spectrometers, and computers used in the actual conduct of the research.
Expenditures for special purpose equipment are allowable as direct costs provided the acquisition of items with a unit cost of $5,000 or more is:
(i) necessary for the research or activity supported by the grant;
(ii) not otherwise reasonably available and accessible;
(iii) of the type normally charged as a direct cost to sponsored agreements; and
(iv) acquired in accordance with organizational practice.
NSF review and approval is required for all special purpose equipment purchases by small business or other commercial organizations.
Expenditures for general purpose equipment are normally unallowable unless the equipment is primarily or exclusively used in the actual conduct of research and included in the approved budget.
NSF review and approval is required for all general purpose equipment purchases by small business or other commercial organizations.
Materials and supplies are defined as tangible personal property other than equipment, costing less than $5,000, or other lower threshold consistent with grantee policy. Materials and supplies that are necessary to carry out the project are allowable as prescribed in the governing cost principles.
a. Expenses for transportation, lodging, subsistence and related items incurred by project personnel and by outside consultants employed on the project (AAG Chapter V.B.6a) who are on travel status on business related to an NSF-supported project are allowable as prescribed in the governing cost principles. The requirements for prior approval detailed in the governing cost principles are waived.
b. Except as provided in the governing cost principles, the difference between economy airfare and a higher-class airfare is unallowable. A train, bus or other surface carrier may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to air travel at the lowest first-class rate by the transportation facility used. However, if such travel could have been performed by air, the allowance will not normally exceed that for economy airfare.
c. Foreign travel costs of dependents of key project personnel are allowable provided the:
(i) individual is a key person who is essential to the research on a full-time basis;
(ii) individual's residence away from home and in a foreign country is for a continuous period of six months or more and is essential to the effective performance of the project; and
(iii) dependent's travel allowance is consistent with the policies of the organization administering the grant.
d. For restrictions concerning the use of non-U.S. Flag carriers while on foreign travel see AAG Chapter VI.G.1.
The costs of services involving the use of highly complex or specialized facilities operated by the organization, such as computing facilities or scientific research instruments, are allowable provided the charges meet the conditions of the governing cost principles. Awardees should address lease versus purchase factors as required by 2 CFR §215.44.
(i) Grantees normally are expected to utilize the services of their own officers or employees to the maximum extent in managing and performing the activities supported by NSF grants. Where it is necessary for a grantee to enter into a consulting agreement for the services of persons who are not its officers or employees, it is expected to do so in accordance with written organizational standards which provide for consideration of the factors outlined in the governing cost principles.
(ii) Costs of professional and consultant services are allowable when reasonable in relation to the services rendered. Payment for consultant services should be comparable to the normal or customary fees charged and received by the consultant for comparable services.
(iii) In determining the allowability of costs in a particular case, no single factor or any special combination of factors is necessarily determinative. However, the following factors, among others, are relevant:
(a) the nature and scope of the service rendered in relation to the service required;
(b) the necessity of issuing a consulting agreement for the service considering the organization's capability in the particular area;
(c) the past pattern of such costs, particularly in the years prior to the award of government contracts and grants;
(d) the impact of government contracts and grants on the organization's total activity (e.g., what new problems have arisen);
(e) whether the proportion of government work to the organization's total activity is such as to influence the organization in favor of incurring the cost, particularly where the services rendered are not of a continuing nature and have little relationship to work under government contracts and grants;
(f) whether the service can be performed more economically by employment rather than by consulting;
(g) the qualifications of the individual or concern rendering the service and the normal/customary fees charged and received by the individual for comparable services, especially on non-government contracts and grants; and
(h) adequacy of the contractual agreement for the service (e.g., description of the service, estimate of time required, rate of compensation and termination provisions).
(iv) In addition, retainer fees to be allowable must be supported by evidence of bona fide services available or rendered.
(v) Costs of legal, accounting and consulting services and related costs incurred in connection with organization and reorganization, defense of antitrust suits and the prosecution of claims against the government are unallowable. Costs of legal, accounting and consulting services and related costs incurred in connection with patent infringement litigation are unallowable unless specifically provided for in the award letter or by advance understanding.
(vi) Grantees may hire consultants not identified in the grant proposal or award, provided:
(a) it is in accordance with written organizational standards;
(b) grant funds are reallocated in accordance with the grantee's policies which are consistent with the governing cost principles; and
(c) it is within the limits of the grant funding.
(vii) All consultant costs should be fully disclosed and justified in the budget justification.
Since intra-university consulting is assumed to be undertaken as a university obligation requiring no compensation in addition to full-time salary, the principles summarized in AAG Chapter V.B.1, also apply to those who function as consultants or otherwise contribute to a project conducted by another faculty member of the same institution. However, in unusual cases where consultation is across departmental lines or involves a separate or remote operation, and the work performed by the consultant is in addition to his/her regular appointment, any charges for such work representing extra compensation above the salary are allowable if consistent with established university policy and the applicable cost principles. If anticipated, any compensation for such consulting services should be disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and approved by NSF.
Employees of the Federal government (other than NSF) may be utilized as lecturers or staff members on a project and may receive compensation and/or expenses if they obtain prior approval from their agencies to participate, and if services to the project are performed outside their regular working hours or while they are on leave status from official duties. Under no circumstances may NSF employees receive compensation from an NSF-supported project.
a. Costs of documenting, preparing, publishing, disseminating and sharing research findings and supporting material are allowable charges against the grant.
b. Page charges for scientific and engineering journal publication are allowable where:
(i) the research papers report work supported by NSF; and
(ii) the charges are levied impartially on all research papers published by the journal, whether by non-government or by government authors.
c. AAG Chapter III.E.2, permits a grantee to transfer from the grant account to an institutional account an amount equal to valid unpaid obligations outstanding at the time a grant expires for such publication charges. A grantee should refer to this section if they have incurred valid commitments for the costs of publication or sharing of research results and it is not possible to effect an actual payment for such charges by the time the final disbursements are due.
(i) Participant support costs are direct costs for items such as stipends or subsistence allowances, travel allowances and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with meetings, conferences, symposia or training projects. For colleges and universities participant support costs may include fellowships, scholarships, and other forms of student financial aid. Generally the participants supported under an NSF award are not employees of the awardee organization. However, for some educational or outreach projects conducted by the awardee the participants being trained may be employees.
(ii) Funds provided for participant support may not be used by grantees for other categories of expense without the specific prior written approval of the cognizant NSF Program Officer. Therefore, awardee organizations must account for participant support costs separately.
(iii) Indirect costs (F&A) are not allowed on participant support costs.
To help defray the costs of personal maintenance while participating in a conference or training activity, participants may be paid a stipend, per diem or subsistence allowance, based on the type and duration of the activity, as outlined in the pertinent program solicitation and in the grant. Such allowances must be reasonable, in conformance with the policy of the grantee organization and limited to the days of attendance at the conference plus the actual travel time required to reach the conference location. Where meals or lodgings are furnished without charge or at a nominal cost (e.g., as part of the registration fee), the per diem or subsistence allowance will be correspondingly reduced. Although local participants may participate in conference meals and coffee breaks as provided for in AAG Chapter V.C.5, grant funds may not be used to pay per diem or similar expenses for local participants in the conference.
(i) Travel costs of participants may be allowable as outlined in the pertinent program solicitation and in the grant. If so, the restrictions regarding class of accommodations (see AAG Chapter V.B.4) and use of U.S.-Flag air carriers (see AAG Chapter VI.G.1) are applicable.
(ii) In training activities that involve field trips, costs of transportation of participants are allowable.
a. Except under certain programs, NSF does not normally make grants for construction or facility improvements. However, rearrangement and alteration costs that do not constitute construction (i.e., rearrangements and alterations aggregating less than $25,000) may be allowable under NSF grants to adapt space or utilities within a completed structure to accomplish the objective of the NSF-supported activity, provided that the:
(i) grantee is not an individual or a foreign organization;
(ii) building has a usable life consistent with project purposes and is architecturally suitable for conversion;
(iii) rearrangement and alteration are essential to the project supported by the grant; and
(iv) space involved will actually be occupied by the project. In situations where the space is rented, in order for the costs of the rearrangement and alteration to be allowable, the grantee must secure a lease for the length of the project. (See AAG Chapter V.C.3.)
b. Rearrangements and alterations under $25,000 may be approved by grantees. For rearrangements and alterations expenditures exceeding $25,000, the grantee must request prior approval from NSF via use of the Notification and Request module in FastLane. Otherwise, any plans for such rearrangement or alteration should be clearly set forth in the proposal. If approved by NSF, such approval will be indicated in the grant. Note that Appendix A, Contract Provisions, of 2 CFR §215 contains various requirements concerning contracts for construction or repair in excess of $2,000.
In amplification of the provisions of the various cost principles regarding public information service costs, the cost of news releases announcing the results of an NSF-supported project is allowable. Grantees should be aware of the restrictions on advertising, organizational promotion, and lobbying costs as outlined in the applicable cost principles. In the event the performing organization wishes to join with NSF in a simultaneous news release, arrangements may be made through the NSF's Office of Legislative and Public Affairs, Public Affairs Group, telephone (703) 292-8070. (See AAG Chapter VI.I.2a.)
a. Normally the grantee is expected to make appropriate facilities available without direct charge to grant funds. However, on occasion, it is necessary to use facilities not under the control of the grantee. Rental of space off-site may be allowable, for example, for a research project if laboratory facilities or other work areas of a type or coverage not normally available to the grantee are required.
b. Rental of special purpose equipment is allowable. (See also AAG Chapter V.B.5.)
c. Rental costs of facilities owned by the awardee or under common control by related parties may be limited to the actual cost of ownership as opposed to fair market rental value. In such cases, the awardee should consult the applicable cost principles.
a. Relocation costs may be charged to an NSF grant as an other direct cost in accordance with the applicable governing cost principles provided that:
(i) a proposal for NSF support specifically indicates that the grantee intends to hire a named individual for full-time work on the project or via advance understanding if determination of the need for such individual is made subsequent to the award;
(ii) such recruitment action is not disapproved by the grant terms; and
(iii) the prospective employee or visiting staff member:
(a) is essential to the project on a full-time basis for a continuous period of at least twelve months; and
(b) is regularly located at a place sufficiently removed from the project site that his/her employment necessitates the change.
(iv) relocation costs charged to an NSF grant that were not included in the approved budget must be fully documented in the grantee’s records and be in accordance with the grantee’s established policies and procedures.
b. The amount of actual reimbursement should be in accordance with the grantee's established policy or practice which:
(i) is in conformance with the applicable governing cost principles;
(ii) has been approved by the cognizant governing audit agency; and
(iii) is consistently applied to both Federal awards and non-federal activities.
Short-term, travel visa costs (as opposed to longer-term, immigration visas) are generally allowable expenses that may be proposed as a direct cost on an NSF proposal. Since short-term visas are issued for a specific period and purpose, they can be clearly identified as directly connected to work performed on an NSF-related project. For these costs to be directly charged to an NSF project, they must be:
- critical and necessary for the conduct of the project;
- allowable under the applicable cost principles;
- consistent with the organization’s cost accounting practices and organizational policy; and
- meet the definition of “direct cost” as described in the applicable cost principles.
The points below summarize the allowability of various items of cost associated with conferences, symposia, workshops or other meetings supported by an NSF grant. Any costs charged to an NSF grant also need to be reasonable and directly allocable to the supported activity. See AAG Chapter VI.G.5 for funding limitations on international travel grants. Meeting and conference costs identified below, are only allowable if such costs are specifically and clearly identified in the proposed scope of work and budget, as modified and approved by NSF.
NSF funds are not to be spent for meals or coffee breaks for intramural meetings of an organization or any of its components, including, but not limited to, laboratories, departments and centers, as a direct cost.
a. Conference Facilities. Rental of facilities and necessary equipment is allowable. (See AAG Chapter V.C.3.)
b. Supplies. Purchase of expendable materials and supplies necessary for the meeting is allowable.
c. Conference Services. Costs of translation services, audio visual, webcast, and computer services for recording, transmitting and transcribing the proceedings are allowable.
d. Publication Costs. Costs of publishing the proceedings are allowable.
e. Salaries. Salaries of professional personnel, editorial and clerical assistants and other staff members are allowable in accordance with AAG Chapter V.B.1, in proportion to the time or effort devoted to the preparation and conduct of the conference and summarizing its results.
f. Consultant Services and Speaker Fees. Reasonable fees and travel allowances and per diem (or meals provided in lieu of per diem) are allowable as prescribed in AAG Chapter V.B.4 and AAG Chapter V.B.6.
g. Meals and Coffee Breaks. When certain meals are an integral and necessary part of a conference (e.g., working meals where business is transacted), grant funds may be used for such meals. Grant funds may also be used for furnishing a reasonable amount of hot beverages or soft drinks to conference participants and attendees during periodic coffee breaks.
h. Participant Support Costs. Participant support costs are allowable as prescribed in AAG Chapter V.B.8.
i. Entertainment. Costs of entertainment, amusement, diversion and social activities and any costs directly associated with such costs (such as tickets to shows or sporting events, meals, lodging, rentals, transportation and gratuities) are unallowable. Travel, meal, and hotel expenses of awardee employees who are not on travel status are unallowable. Costs of employees on travel status are limited to those allowed under the governing cost principles for travel expenses. (See AAG Chapter V.B.4)
j. Alcoholic Beverages. No Federal funds may be spent on alcoholic beverages.
k. Gifts, souvenirs, t-shirts and other memorabilia are not typically considered allowable costs to an NSF grant.
As authorized by statute (41 USC §254a) and Comptroller General decision (B-157584) and recommended by governing cost principles, NSF has elected to use predetermined overhead rates where appropriate. When NSF elects not to use predetermined rates, the grant will indicate the type of indirect cost rate applicable to the award. Where grantees receive limited NSF funding, the Foundation may elect to set award specific rates as opposed to a formal annual negotiated indirect cost rate agreement.
(i) Except as noted in AAG Chapters V.B.8 and VI.G.5, or in an NSF program solicitation, it is NSF policy that grantees are entitled to reimbursement from grant funds for indirect costs (F&A) allocable to the NSF share of allowable direct costs of a project. NSF program staff may not negotiate indirect costs as a discrete item of a proposal budget. NSF program staff are not authorized to suggest or request that PI/PDs seek reductions or waivers of indirect costs except as explicitly specified in applicable NSF program solicitations.
Foreign grantees are not eligible for indirect cost rate recovery unless the foreign grantee has a previously negotiated rate agreement with a U.S. Federal agency that has a practice of negotiating rates with foreign entities.
(ii) The awarded indirect cost rate is generally based upon a grantee’s current Federally negotiated indirect cost rate agreement. When establishing an indirect rate for an award where the grantee does not have a current negotiated rate agreement, NSF will consider the rate proposed in the budget, the grantee’s indirect cost proposal submission, the amount of total funding requested and other pertinent financial factors. Since some types of rates limit indirect cost recoveries and require adjustments, grantees receiving awards should ensure that they understand the type of indirect cost rate, the applicable base and the type of rate used in the grant.
Types of indirect cost rates used on NSF awards are as follows:
(a) Maximum Provisional Rate: A maximum provisional rate is a temporary rate established for an award to permit funding and reporting of indirect costs pending establishment of a final rate (the rate determined at the end of an accounting period using “actual” direct and indirect cost data). This type of rate limits indirect cost recoveries to the lower of the maximum provisional rate established at the time of award, or the final rate established at the end of an accounting period. A maximum provisional rate is both a billing and a ceiling rate. In no event may the grantee recover indirect costs in excess of the maximum provisional rate regardless of actual cost.
(b) Provisional Rate – A provisional rate is a temporary rate established to permit funding and reporting of costs pending establishment of a final rate (the rate determined at the end of an accounting period using "actual" direct and indirect cost data). Under a provisional rate, actual indirect costs and final negotiated rates may exceed the provisional rate. However, awardees must stay within the limitation of funds provided under the award. NSF will not provide additional funding to cover increased indirect costs.
(c) Grantees with grant-specific maximum provisional or provisional rates are required to submit indirect cost proposals to the NSF Cost Analysis and Audit Resolution Branch within six months after the close of each fiscal year during which the award is active. In both cases, adjustments to awards for amounts previously billed may be required after final indirect cost rates are established.
(iii) Predetermined Rate: A predetermined rate is a permanent funding rate established for an award based on an estimate of costs for that period. Grantees may charge NSF projects at the rate(s) stipulated in the award. However, should negotiations between the organization and the cognizant agency result in changes in the approved indirect cost rate not reflected in the NSF award, the grantee may charge NSF projects at the newly negotiated rate in effect at the time direct cost expenditures are made, provided that this method of charging indirect costs is consistently applied; and provided further that to do so would not:
- reduce or adversely affect the scope of the project;
- result in increased costs over the NSF award amount during the award period;
- decrease the period of support as contemplated in the award; or
- be inconsistent with any special indirect cost provision of the award.
(1) Special Limitation concerning Predetermined Rates at Colleges and Universities subject to 2 CFR §220 (OMB Circular A-21)
2 CFR §220 (OMB Circular A-21) contains an additional restriction on recovery of indirect costs for colleges and universities and other organizations of higher education. These awardees are subject to a further limitation in that the negotiated rate at the time the award is made shall be used throughout the life of the award. The applicable text from 2 CFR §220 (OMB Circular A-21) is repeated below:
"7. Fixed rates for the life of the sponsored agreement.a. Federal agencies shall use the negotiated rates for F&A costs in effect at the time of the initial award throughout the life of the sponsored agreement. "Life" for the purpose of this subsection means each competitive segment of a project. A competitive segment is a period of years approved by the Federal funding agency at the time of the award. If negotiated rate agreements do not extend through the life of the sponsored agreement at the time of the initial award, then the negotiated rate for the last year of the sponsored agreement shall be extended through the end of the life of the sponsored agreement. Award levels for sponsored agreements may not be adjusted in future years as a result of changes in negotiated rates."
(c) Fixed Rate: A fixed rate is a permanent rate established for an award based on an estimate of costs for the award period. However, a fixed rate is fixed both for funding and reimbursement. When NSF funds an award using a fixed indirect cost rate, the grantee may recover indirect costs from grant funds at no more than the fixed rate established for the award. A fixed rate is not subject to adjustment.
(d) Fixed Dollar Amount: A fixed dollar amount limits grantees to the "amount" of indirect costs specified in the approved budget. A fixed indirect dollar amount is not subject to adjustment.
(iii) NSF will not amend a grant solely to provide additional funds for changes in indirect cost rates.
(iv) NSF will generally fund continuing grant increments and supplemental support at the indirect cost rate(s) approved at the time of the initial award. (See AAG Chapter I.E.)
(v) When a project involves off-campus (off-site) activities, NSF normally will fund the indirect cost amount on the basis of the off-campus rate. When a project involves both on- and off-campus activities, NSF normally will fund the indirect cost amount on the basis of the on-campus/off-campus policy reflected in the most recent agreement between the organization and the cognizant Federal agency. In the absence of such an agreed policy, NSF normally will compute the indirect cost amount by applying the on-campus rate to the on-campus base costs and the off-campus rate to the off-campus base costs.
(vi) Any negotiations with respect to business and financial matters on specific grants, including the amount of indirect cost reimbursement, are conducted by the cognizant Grants and Agreements Officer in DGA with an authorized official of the grantee’s organization. The NSF Cost Analysis and Audit Resolution Branch provides advisory assistance to the Grants and Agreements Officer.
Organizations for which NSF is their cognizant agency for negotiation of indirect cost rates and who do not have approved award specific rates are required to submit indirect cost proposals, reconciled to financial statements, within six months after the close of each accounting year during which NSF has active awards. Indirect cost proposals should be sent to the Cost Analysis and Audit Resolution Branch.
See https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/caar/docs/idcsubmissions.pdf for indirect cost rate proposal submission requirements.
Such proposals should be sent electronically to BFACAARMPR@nsf.gov or by paper copy to Team Lead Indirect Costs, National Science Foundation, Division of Institution and Award Support, Room 485, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
Payment of fees (profit) are allowable only if specifically permitted by a program solicitation and only to the extent that it does not exceed the amount negotiated by the Grants and Agreements Officer and specified in the award letter.