text-only page produced automatically by LIFT Text
Transcoder Skip all navigation and go to page contentSkip top navigation and go to directorate navigationSkip top navigation and go to page navigation
National Science Foundation HomeNational Science Foundation - Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences (SBE)
Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences
design element
SBE Home
About SBE
Funding Opportunities
Advisory Committee
Career Opportunities
See Additional SBE Resources
View SBE Staff
SBE Organizations
SBE Office of Multidisciplinary Activities (SMA )
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSE)
Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences (BCS )
Division of Social and Economic Sciences (SES )
Proposals and Awards
Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide
Proposal Preparation and Submission
bullet Grant Proposal Guide
  bullet Grants.gov Application Guide
Award and Administration
bullet Award and Administration Guide
Award Conditions
Merit Review
NSF Outreach
Policy Office Website
Additional SBE Resources
Advisory Committee Meetings
Career Opportunities
Funding Rates
Budget Excerpt
NSB Broader Impacts Website
Research on Cognition and Behavior
Research on Human Behavior in Time and Space
Research on Cooperation and Conflict
Exploring What Makes Us Human
Bringing People Into Focus: How Social, Behavioral & Economic Research Addresses National Challenges
Rebuilding the Mosaic Report
SBE Advisory Committee Web Site (for members only)

SBE 2020: Submission Detail

ID Number: 176
Title: Economics, Climate, and Values: An Integrated Approach
Lead Author: Nelson, Julie A
Abstract: How can we integrate the role of values and ethics in economic analysis of climate change without sacrificing the positive aspirations of that science? Given the urgency of the measures required by climate change, economic analysis has never been as important as it is today. And given the necessity of value judgments in economic analyses of policy options, the tension between fact and value has never been more conspicuous. But while significant strides have recently been made in the understanding of both the inadequacy and impracticality of a fact/value dichotomy in scientific research, many in economics seem to continue to adhere to outmoded (and now clearly inappropriate) images of science. The net effect has been to undermine the usefulness of economic advice to policy makers. The ideal of objectivity to which economists aspire needs to be reframed and broadened in ways that take advantage of new resources from the philosophy of science, environmental philosophy, and other social sciences. Ultimately, changes in the education of young economists, as well as in patterns of support for practicing economists will be necessary to effect a shift to an ideal of objectivity in which the role of values can be properly integrated.
PDF: Nelson_Julie_176.pdf

SBE 2020 Home


Print this page
Back to Top of page