text-only page produced automatically by LIFT Text
Transcoder Skip all navigation and go to page contentSkip top navigation and go to directorate navigationSkip top navigation and go to page navigation
National Science Foundation HomeNational Science Foundation - Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences (SBE)
Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences
design element
SBE Home
About SBE
Funding Opportunities
Advisory Committee
Career Opportunities
See Additional SBE Resources
View SBE Staff
SBE Organizations
SBE Office of Multidisciplinary Activities (SMA )
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSE)
Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences (BCS )
Division of Social and Economic Sciences (SES )
Proposals and Awards
Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide
Proposal Preparation and Submission
bullet Grant Proposal Guide
  bullet Grants.gov Application Guide
Award and Administration
bullet Award and Administration Guide
Award Conditions
Merit Review
NSF Outreach
Policy Office Website
Additional SBE Resources
Advisory Committee Meetings
Career Opportunities
Funding Rates
Budget Excerpt
NSB Broader Impacts Website
Research on Cognition and Behavior
Research on Human Behavior in Time and Space
Research on Cooperation and Conflict
Exploring What Makes Us Human
Bringing People Into Focus: How Social, Behavioral & Economic Research Addresses National Challenges
Rebuilding the Mosaic Report
SBE Advisory Committee Web Site (for members only)

SBE 2020: Submission Detail

ID Number: 20
Title: Predictive Game Theory
Lead Author: Fudenberg, Drew
Abstract: Game theory is used in a variety of field inside and outside of social science. The standard methodology is to write down a description of the game and characterize its Nash or subgame perfect equilibria, but this is only sometimes a good approximation of observed behavior. The goal of predictive game theory is to develop models that better predict actual behavior in the field and in the lab. Core questions include: What determines peoples behavior the first time they play an unfamiliar game? How do people update their play based on their observations? What sorts of theories of mind, if any, are commonly used to guide play, and what do people think about the objective and rationality of their opponents? How do people think about games with a very large number of actions- what sort of pruning is involved? When will play resemble an equilibrium of the game, and which equilibrium will tend to emerge? Similarly, in a decentralized matching market, when will play converge to a stable outcome, and which one? To develop answers, researchers will need to combine insights from behavioral economics and psy
PDF: Fudenberg_Drew_20.pdf

SBE 2020 Home


Print this page
Back to Top of page