by Michael Yamaner[1]

In FY 2015, federal agencies obligated $30.5 billion to 1,016 academic institutions for science and engineering (S&E) activities. This represents a 2% decrease in current dollars from the $31.1 billion obligated to 1,003 academic institutions in FY 2014. These statistics are from the Survey of Federal Science and Engineering Support to Universities, Colleges, and Nonprofit Institutions (Federal S&E Support Survey) from the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES) within the National Science Foundation (NSF).

After adjusting for inflation, federal S&E obligations to academic institutions decreased $0.9 billion (3%) between FY 2014 and FY 2015, following a $1.1 billion increase (4%) from FY 2013 to FY 2014 (table 1). For the remainder of this InfoBrief, unless otherwise noted, amounts for FY 2015 obligations and comparisons with previous years are in current dollars.

TABLE 1. Federal academic science and engineering obligations, by activity: FYs 2012–15

NOTES: Gross domestic product implicit price deflators were used to convert current to constant dollars. Detail may not sum to total due to rounding.

SOURCE: National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Survey of Federal Science and Engineering Support to Universities, Colleges, and Nonprofit Institutions.

Table 1 Source Data: Excel file

Fiscal year All federal
obligations
Research and
development
R&D
plant
Facilities and
equipment for
instruction in S&E
Fellowships,
traineeships, and
training grants
General
support for
S&E
Other
S&E
activities
Current $millions
2012 31,003 27,495 434 4 914 142 2,015
2013 29,353 26,106 271 4 893 132 1,948
2014 31,095 27,591 400 11 1,340 138 1,616
2015 30,494 27,041 371 4 1,348 136 1,594
Constant FY 2009 $millions
2012 29,580 26,233 414 4 872 135 1,923
2013 27,533 24,487 254 4 838 124 1,827
2014 28,677 25,446 369 10 1,236 127 1,490
2015 27,747 24,605 338 4 1,227 124 1,450

Categories of Academic S&E Support

Federal academic S&E obligations include six categories: research and development (R&D) (89% of total annual federal academic S&E obligations over the past 4 years); R&D plant; facilities and equipment for instruction in S&E; fellowships, traineeships, and training grants; general support for S&E; and other S&E activities (table 1).

Federal academic R&D obligations decreased $0.6 billion (2%) between FY 2014 and FY 2015. Four of the five remaining categories also showed decreased funding in FY 2015. R&D plant had the second largest decrease ($29 million, or 7%), followed by S&E activities ($22 million, or 1%). Fellowships, traineeships, and training grants showed the only increase ($8 million, or 1%) in FY 2015 (table 1).

Agency Sources for Academic S&E Support

Collectively, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), NSF, and the Department of Defense (DOD) provided 85% of all federally funded academic S&E obligations in FY 2015. Of these agencies, HHS accounted for 56% of all federally funded obligations; NSF, 17%; and DOD, 11%. The Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Department of Energy (DOE), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) provided most of the remaining academic S&E total (13%). Three of six of the largest academic S&E funding agencies (HHS, DOD, and DOE) decreased obligations between FY 2014 and FY 2015, with HHS reporting the largest decrease ($0.5 billion, or 3%). By contrast, NSF, USDA, and NASA increased obligations in FY 2015, led by NSF's $0.2 billion (4%) (table 2).

TABLE 2. Federal academic S&E obligations, by agency in FY 2015 rank order: FYs 2012–15

DOD = Department of Defense; DOE = Department of Energy; HHS = Department of Health and Human Services; NASA = National Aeronautics and Space Administration; NSF = National Science Foundation; USDA = Department of Agriculture.

a Includes data for the following agencies: the Departments of Commerce, Education, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, and Transportation; the Agency for International Development; the Environmental Protection Agency; the Appalachian Regional Commission; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; the Office of Justice Programs (part of the Department of Justice); and the Social Security Administration.

NOTES: Gross domestic product implicit price deflators were used to convert current to constant dollars. Detail may not sum to total due to rounding.

SOURCE: National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Survey of Federal Science and Engineering Support to Universities, Colleges, and Nonprofit Institutions.

Table 2 Source Data: Excel file

Fiscal year All
agencies
HHS NSF DOD USDA DOE NASA Other
agenciesa
Current $millions
2012 31,003 17,939 5,181 3,653 1,221 1,037 984 989
2013 29,353 16,881 5,023 3,384 1,136 1,077 1,004 848
2014 31,095 17,517 5,092 3,714 1,301 1,527 1,087 857
2015 30,494 17,008 5,295 3,501 1,424 1,272 1,135 859
Constant FY 2009 $millions
2012 29,580 17,116 4,943 3,485 1,165 989 939 944
2013 27,533 15,834 4,712 3,174 1,066 1,010 942 795
2014 28,677 16,155 4,696 3,425 1,200 1,408 1,002 790
2015 27,747 15,476 4,818 3,186 1,296 1,157 1,033 782

University Shares of Academic S&E Support

The Johns Hopkins University (including its Applied Physics Laboratory) continued to be the leading academic recipient of federal S&E obligations, with $1.6 billion in FY 2015. DOD provided Johns Hopkins with the largest share of federal S&E funds (45% of Johns Hopkins' FY 2015 total). The top 20 university recipients of federal academic S&E obligations accounted for 36% of the FY 2015 federal total. Of these universities, 19 were also ranked among the top 20 recipients in FY 2014. In FY 2015, Cornell University's rank fell from 20th to 25th and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's rank rose from 21st to 20th (table 3).

TABLE 3. Federal academic science and engineering obligations to the 20 universities and colleges receiving the largest amounts, by agency: FY 2015
(Thousands of dollars)

DOD = Department of Defense; DOE = Department of Energy; HHS = Department of Health and Human Services; NASA = National Aeronautics and Space Administration; NSF = National Science Foundation; USDA = Department of Agriculture.

a Includes data for the following agencies: the Departments of Commerce, Education, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, and Transportation; the Agency for International Development; the Environmental Protection Agency; the Appalachian Regional Commission; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; the Office of Justice Programs (part of the Department of Justice); and the Social Security Administration.
b Includes funding for Applied Physics Laboratory.

NOTE: Detail may not sum to total due to rounding.

SOURCE: National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Survey of Federal Science and Engineering Support to Universities, Colleges, and Nonprofit Institutions, FY 2015.

Table 3 Source Data: Excel file

Institution All federal
obligations
HHS NSF DOD USDA DOE NASA Other
agenciesa
All institutions 30,493,591 17,008,320 5,294,676 3,500,899 1,424,454 1,271,809 1,134,545 858,889
Top 20 institutions 10,911,483 7,145,020 1,128,256 1,572,500 121,277 347,534 423,592 173,304
Johns Hopkins U.b 1,552,227 593,597 31,950 706,151 0 4,970 212,130 3,429
U. Washington 659,587 437,415 86,765 66,239 11,180 17,295 11,880 28,812
U. Michigan 646,673 447,944 82,650 50,604 1,843 24,337 20,973 18,322
U. California, San Diego 584,261 371,358 92,822 68,373 722 18,108 9,685 23,193
U. California, San Francisco 571,144 545,331 5,005 19,973 0 0 835 0
U. Pennsylvania 547,172 442,976 44,029 48,103 1,184 7,743 2,671 465
Stanford U. 540,336 401,842 56,522 55,725 0 8,711 12,647 4,889
Columbia U. in the City of New York 515,509 362,343 91,420 27,526 0 10,548 19,045 4,626
U. California, Los Angeles 510,426 370,466 69,708 33,112 36 20,614 14,958 1,532
U. Pittsburgh 494,697 424,835 22,777 39,401 0 5,776 584 1,325
Harvard U. 463,310 343,235 53,896 47,119 0 9,808 6,283 2,970
Duke U. 463,109 368,305 41,725 33,672 100 14,422 2,959 1,927
U. Colorado Boulder 460,851 235,876 74,357 38,247 202 12,372 50,287 49,509
U. Wisconsin-Madison 447,256 264,545 79,868 17,314 31,894 49,701 0 3,934
U. North Carolina, Chapel Hill 440,480 386,114 24,994 12,345 0 7,239 703 9,085
Washington U., Saint Louis 422,773 373,506 17,357 16,620 0 8,603 6,688 0
U. Minnesota 407,741 246,927 87,257 13,612 39,097 11,715 3,962 5,171
Yale U. 405,153 337,239 32,253 23,451 30 9,722 2,078 380
Pennsylvania State U. 404,717 100,730 64,199 159,415 34,989 30,712 7,740 6,932
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 374,062 90,434 68,701 95,499 0 75,139 37,486 6,804
All other academic institutions 19,582,109 9,863,300 4,166,420 1,928,398 1,303,177 924,275 710,953 685,586

Federal S&E Support to Minority-Serving Academic Institutions

NCSES's Federal S&E Support Survey also tracks obligations to three categories of minority-serving institutions (MSIs):[2] historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs),[3] high-Hispanic-enrollment (HHE)[4] institutions, and tribal colleges and universities.[5]

S&E obligations to MSIs were $783 million, 3% of the total $30.5 billion in S&E obligations to universities and colleges in FY 2015. Between FY 2014 and FY 2015, obligations to MSIs increased by 1% ($11.5 million), the third straight yearly increase. R&D annually has accounted for between 63% and 69% of total S&E obligations to MSIs from FY 2012 through FY 2015.

The top 20 MSIs ranked by federal academic S&E support accounted for 56% of the academic S&E total for MSIs in FY 2015. New Mexico State University, an HHE, was the leading MSI recipient of federal S&E obligations, receiving $48.8 million in FY 2015, of which 84% was for R&D (table 4). New Mexico State University received 62% of its S&E total from three agencies: DOD ($11.6 million), NSF ($9.6 million), and NASA ($9.0 million).

TABLE 4. Federal obligations for science and engineering to minority-serving institutions, ranked by total amount received in FY 2015: FYs 2012–15
(Thousands of dollars)

na = not applicable; New Mexico State U. did not meet the requirements of a "minority-serving institution" that year.

NOTES: Because of rounding, detail may not add to totals. This list of minority institutions is based on the definition of "minority institution" found in the Higher Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1067k(3)) and on fall 2014 enrollment data self-reported by the institutions in the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) survey conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). NCES has determined that each academic institution on this list reported an enrollment of a single minority group or a combination of those minority groups that exceeded 50% of its total enrollment. Minority is defined as American Indian or Alaska Native, black (not of Hispanic origin), and Hispanic. This list excludes Asians or Pacific Islanders (IPEDS enrollment data do not disaggregate Pacific Islanders from Asians, although Pacific Islanders are a minority) because Asians are not considered a minority under this program and because studies show that they are not underrepresented in science and engineering.

SOURCE: National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Survey of Federal Science and Engineering Support to Universities, Colleges, and Nonprofit Institutions.

Table 4 Source Data: Excel file

2012   2013   2014   2015
Rank Institution All federal
obligations
R&D   All federal
obligations
R&D   All federal
obligations
R&D   All federal
obligations
R&D
All minority-serving institutions 673,791 424,700   720,406 468,697   771,796 514,866   783,312 539,381
1 New Mexico State U. na na   78,835 70,022   87,644 75,235   48,786 40,952
2 Florida International U. 36,231 32,997   35,296 30,770   35,138 30,301   45,340 36,962
3 Morehouse School of Medicine 28,223 23,001   29,445 23,583   33,244 27,587   30,298 24,988
4 U. Texas El Paso 27,739 18,430   23,111 16,879   25,080 20,011   29,669 22,265
5 North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State U. 26,688 15,811   24,762 14,811   27,490 19,689   29,380 18,471
6 U. Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus 26,449 26,449   29,571 28,083   25,835 25,774   25,970 25,149
7 U. Texas San Antonio 23,053 20,084   20,505 16,802   20,940 18,715   23,322 21,479
8 CUNY City C. 25,542 22,752   22,957 22,005   29,241 27,219   22,430 20,334
9 U. Puerto Rico Mayaguez 20,170 8,156   18,749 8,299   24,253 11,798   20,861 10,347
10 Howard U. 23,797 15,437   20,348 11,635   22,022 14,743   20,144 14,746
11 Florida A&M U. 15,431 7,433   16,545 10,478   17,421 11,692   19,495 13,104
12 Prairie View A&M U. 14,975 7,288   13,909 7,769   13,931 6,766   17,139 12,239
13 Tennessee State U. 12,194 6,855   13,824 6,886   18,570 6,014   15,681 8,454
14 Meharry Medical C. 24,872 18,703   20,659 15,202   16,991 11,053   15,087 9,383
15 Hampton U. 9,858 7,280   11,800 9,012   11,479 10,028   15,009 12,207
16 Alabama A&M U. 14,603 7,103   11,381 6,007   10,780 4,436   13,987 9,642
17 U. Texas Rio Grande Valley 10,419 7,716   9,866 5,083   8,696 4,707   13,516 9,706
18 Tuskegee U. 19,754 15,118   18,850 10,846   17,831 10,465   12,592 7,213
19 Jackson State U. 13,395 8,353   14,776 12,209   10,882 6,775   12,163 9,454
20 U. of the District of Columbia 5,634 2,597   3,887 1,257   4,020 1,029   11,662 2,326
All other minority-serving institutions 294,764 153,140   281,329 141,060   310,310 170,832   340,781 209,960

Federal S&E Support to Nonprofit Institutions

NCSES collects statistics on federal obligations to independent nonprofit institutions for two of the six S&E categories: R&D and R&D plant. During FY 2015 federal agencies obligated $5.8 billion to 1,024 nonprofit institutions, a 5% decrease from the $6.1 billion reported in FY 2014. Massachusetts General Hospital received the most federal R&D and R&D plant funds ($349 million) among nonprofits in FY 2015, with HHS providing 97% of this funding (table 5).

TABLE 5. Federal research and development and R&D plant obligations to the 10 independent nonprofit institutions receiving the largest amounts, by agency: FY 2015
(Thousands of dollars)

DOD = Department of Defense; DOE = Department of Energy; HHS = Department of Health and Human Services; NASA = National Aeronautics and Space Administration; NSF = National Science Foundation.

a Includes data for the following agencies: the Departments of Commerce, Education, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, and Transportation; the Agency for International Development; the Environmental Protection Agency; the Appalachian Regional Commission; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; the Office of Justice Programs (part of the Department of Justice); and the Social Security Administration.

NOTE: Detail may not sum to total due to rounding.

SOURCE: National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Survey of Federal Science and Engineering Support to Universities, Colleges, and Nonprofit Institutions, FY 2015.

Table 5 Source Data: Excel file

Institution All federal
obligations
HHS DOD NSF NASA DOE Other
agenciesa
All nonprofit institutions 5,756,745 4,077,493 730,422 314,187 235,126 142,406 257,112
Top 10 nonprofit institutions 1,997,323 1,679,420 256,054 32,947 1,156 24,987 2,760
Massachusetts General Hospital 348,970 338,944 7,157 2,639 230 0 0
Brigham and Women's Hospital 320,660 319,129 724 0 806 0 0
Mayo Clinic 238,868 233,435 5,073 361 0 0 0
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 232,509 232,091 320 99 0 0 0
Battelle Memorial Institute, all locations 213,463 29,311 163,476 5 120 18,643 1,909
SRI International 157,427 48,712 74,733 26,837 0 6,345 801
Boston Children's Hospital 133,821 130,693 2,572 557 0 0 0
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute 123,760 121,809 1,651 300 0 0 0
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia 117,838 115,893 0 1,895 0 0 50
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston 110,007 109,404 348 255 0 0 0
All other nonprofit institutions 3,759,423 2,398,074 474,368 281,239 233,970 117,419 254,353

In FY 2015, the 10 leading nonprofit institutions for federal S&E funding received 35% of the total funds to all nonprofits. Eight of these recipients were hospitals or medical research institutes, and six also ranked among the top 10 in the prior year.

Four nonprofits moved into the top 10 in FY 2015, Boston Children's Hospital (7th in FY 2015, up from 11th in FY 2014), the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (8th, up from 12th), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (9th, up from 13th), and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (10th, up from 15th). Three nonprofits fell out of the top 10 and one was reclassified, RAND Corporation (29th in FY 2015, down from 7th in FY 2014), Broad Institute (12th, down from 9th) and the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (16th, down from 10th) (table 5). The Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (ranked 6th among nonprofit institutions receiving federal S&E funding in FY 2014) has been reclassified as an academic consortium.

Data Sources, Limitations, and Availability

Gross domestic product implicit price deflators were used to convert current to constant dollars in this InfoBrief. Data presented herein were obtained from the 20 agencies (12 federal departments and 8 independent agencies) that made S&E obligations to academic and nonprofit institutions in FY 2015, as reported to the Federal S&E Support Survey. The survey collects federal S&E support data by funding agency, institution, type of activity, type of institution, and geographic location.

The six funding categories of federal S&E support are defined as follows:

The full set of detailed statistical tables on the FY 2015 Federal S&E Support Survey will be available online at https://nsf.gov/statistics/fedsupport/. Individual tables may be available in advance of the full report. For more information, please contact the author.

Notes

[1] Michael Yamaner, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 965, Arlington, VA 22230 (myamaner@nsf.gov; 703-292-7815).

[2] The list of minority institutions is based on the definition of "minority institution" found in the Higher Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1067k(3)) and on enrollment data for a given year from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) collected by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). NCES determines that each academic institution on the list reported an enrollment of a single minority group or a combination of those minority groups that exceeded 50% of its total enrollment. Minority is defined as American Indian or Alaska Native, black (not of Hispanic origin), and Hispanic. Asians or Pacific Islanders (IPEDS enrollment data do not disaggregate Pacific Islanders from Asians, although Pacific Islanders are a minority) are not considered a minority under this program.

[3] The Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, defines an HBCU as "any historically black college or university that was established prior to 1964, whose principal mission was, and is, the education of black Americans, and that is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association determined by the Secretary (of Education) to be a reliable authority as to the quality of training offered or is, according to such an agency or association, making reasonable progress toward accreditation" (see https://sites.ed.gov/whhbcu/one-hundred-and-five-historically-black-colleges-and-universities/).

[4] Institutions are identified as having high Hispanic enrollment for this report based on fall 2014 enrollment. They are institutions whose full-time-equivalent (FTE ) fall enrollment of undergraduate students is at least 25% Hispanic in a given year. The fall enrollment data are self-reported by the institutions to the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System survey conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics. The exact number and identification of HHE institutions can vary from year to year.

An HHE institution is not necessarily a Hispanic-serving institution (HSI). HSIs are eligible institutions that have recently received grants from the Department of Education's HSI program, authorized by Title V of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended. In 2014, eligibility for the HSI program was defined as being open to nonprofit institutions with at least 25% Hispanic FTE undergraduate enrollment, and at least 50% of the Hispanic enrollment had to be low income. The Third Higher Education Extension Act of 2006 removed the low-income criterion for defining eligibility for the HSI program.

University of New Mexico's Gallup, Los Alamos, and Taos campuses are not HHE institutions; data for these campuses are therefore excluded from the total.

[5] The list of tribal colleges and universities is from the White House Initiative on American Indian and Alaska Native Education (see https://sites.ed.gov/whiaiane/tribes-tcus/tribal-colleges-and-universities/). Tribal colleges and universities are designated in section 2 of the Tribally Controlled College or University Assistance Act of 1978.