text-only page produced automatically by LIFT Text Transcoder Skip all navigation and go to page contentSkip top navigation and go to directorate navigationSkip top navigation and go to page navigation
National Science Foundation Home National Science Foundation - Geosciences (GEO)
Polar Programs (PLR)
design element
PLR Home
About PLR
Funding Opportunities
Awards
News
Events
Discoveries
Publications
Career Opportunities
Contact POLAR
Polar Programs site map
See Additional PLR Resources
View PLR Staff
GEO Organizations
Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences (AGS)
Earth Sciences (EAR)
Ocean Sciences (OCE)
Polar Programs (PLR)
Proposals and Awards
Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide
  Introduction
Proposal Preparation and Submission
bullet Grant Proposal Guide
  bullet Grants.gov Application Guide
Award and Administration
bullet Award and Administration Guide
Award Conditions
Other Types of Proposals
Merit Review
NSF Outreach
Policy Office
Additional PLR Resources
Antarctic Sciences (ANT)
Antarctic Infrastructure and Logistics (AIL)
Arctic Sciences (ARC)
Polar Environment, Safety and Health (PESH)
Polar Program-supported workshops
Related Polar Links
Polar Publications list
POLAR webmaster
Other Site Features
Special Reports
Research Overviews
Multimedia Gallery
Classroom Resources
NSF-Wide Investments

Email this pagePrint this page

Discovery
Glacier Movement Limits How Fast Sea Level Can Rise

Study finds 3 to 6 feet by 2100 possible

Photo of the researchers' field camp in Greenland.

The researchers' field camp in Greenland receives additional supplies.
Credit and Larger Version

September 18, 2008

The fast motion of glaciers, which can cause large amounts of ice to be dumped off land into the sea, is a wild card in projections of sea level rise, but estimates of its contribution can still be constrained according to a recent study funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF).

Principal investigator Joel Harper, a glaciologist at the University of Montana, says it is more plausible to expect sea level to rise as much as 80 centimeters by the end of this century, rather than several meters, as some scientists have theorized.

"We have estimated limits on sea level rise during the next century by considering simple constraints on glacier and ice sheet motion," Harper said. "Our work suggests that 0.8 meter of sea level rise is a plausible upper limit, while an upper limit of 2 meters is possible only under extreme conditions and more than 2 meters appears unlikely."

Considering all major sources of sea level rise, including water and ice discharged from Greenland, Antarctica, smaller glaciers and ice caps and the thermal expansion of water as ocean basins warm, the researchers' most likely estimate of roughly 3 to 6 feet by 2100 is still potentially devastating to huge tracts of low lying coastal areas.

"A rise in sea level of 0.8 to 2 meters is still a very serious business, especially for the millions of third-world people who live within a meter of sea level," Harper said.

An article about this research appeared in the September 5 issue of Science. Co-authors are Tad Pfeffer, a glaciologist with the University of Colorado at Boulder, and Shad O'Neel, a researcher with Scripps Institute of Oceanography at the University of California at San Diego. A University of Colorado fellowship co-funded the study.

"We don't understand the physics in enough detail to predict a rise in sea level precisely," Pfeffer said."The problem of maximum sea level rise by 2100 is still rather open-ended. Sea level has risen very fast at times in the geologic past, but those events aren't necessarily good predictors of events in the near future. We need to use the tools we've got to get the best answer we can for the conditions that exist today. While we don't claim that a rise in sea level beyond 2 meters in the next century is a physical impossibility, we believe it is extremely unlikely and would not be a good working model for policy makers and community planners."

"As this study indicates, climate change is an incredibly complex process," said NSF program officer Bill Wiseman. "These research results add another significant piece to the puzzle as we try to understand the various drivers of climate change and the potential consequences of those drivers. Although the work by Joel and his colleagues involves many assumptions, such efforts will be necessary to place realistic limits on future sea level conditions until we are able to model glaciers and ice sheets accurately."

Glaciers add water to the sea through surface melt and by "calving" icebergs. Surface melting of ice cannot alone cause multiple meters of sea level rise by 2100. The marine-terminating glaciers would also need to speed up and discharge an increased number of icebergs into the ocean. The researchers estimated what flow conditions would have to exist for Greenland to raise the sea level by large amounts (2 and 5 meters) in the next century and then asked whether those conditions might reasonably occur.

To construct a truly predictive model of sea level rise is not possible at this time, as scientists simply don't understand the physics of glacier dynamics well enough. For one thing, not all the glacier contribution to sea level comes from Greenland and Antarctica. At present, the world's other glaciers and ice caps contribute nearly double the amount of water that Greenland and Antarctica do. The researchers focused on Greenland because of its vulnerability to Arctic warming, the recent accelerations of glaciers there and its large volume reductions during the last interglacial period. Also, the kind of data required to answer their questions are available for Greenland, but not for most of Antarctica or the remaining glaciers and ice caps.

"For Greenland to deliver 2 meters of sea level to the ocean by 2100 requires that all of the ocean terminating outlet glaciers there move at rates about 40 times faster than they move today, or about three times faster than we have ever observed an outlet glacier move for extended periods," Harper said. "Furthermore, this fast motion must start immediately and must be sustained until the end of the century. While we don't claim that this is a physical impossibility, we believe that it's extremely unlikely and not a good central working hypothesis for making predictions."

Harper and his colleagues will continue their research to understand how much surface melt from Greenland's glaciers actually escapes to the sea from the ice sheet covering the continent. They are also working to understand more about the glacier calving process and outlet glacier dynamics with a detailed study of Alaskan tidewater glaciers. Finally, by installing numerous sensors at the bed of an Alaskan glacier, they are studying how water at the base of glaciers causes increased ice motion.

--  Diane Banegas, National Science Foundation (703) 966-0316 dbanegas@nsf.gov

Investigators
Joel Harper
Shad O'Neel
Tad Pfeffer

Related Institutions/Organizations
University of Montana
University of Colorado at Boulder
Scripps Institute of Oceanography at U.C. San Diego

Related Awards
#0612506 Collaborative Research: A field validated model for melt-water infiltration and runoff from the Greenland Ice Sheet

Total Grants
$159,475

Time-lapse sequence of the terminus of Columbia Glacier, Prince William Sound, Alaska.
View Video
Time-lapse sequence of the terminus of Columbia Glacier, Prince William Sound, Alaska.
Credit and Larger Version

Photo of researchers collecting radar data to document meltwater movement on the Ice Sheet.
Researchers collect radar data to document meltwater movement on the Greenland Ice Sheet.
Credit and Larger Version

Photo of the researchers' field camp on the Greenland Ice Sheet.
The researchers' field camp on the Greenland Ice Sheet.
Credit and Larger Version

Photo of researcher Joel Harper making measurements on water flow through snow.
Researcher Joel Harper makes measurements on water flow through snow.
Credit and Larger Version

Cover of the September 5, 2008, issue of Science magazine.
The researchers' findings were published in the Sept. 5, 2008, issue of Science magazine.
Credit and Larger Version



Email this pagePrint this page
Back to Top of page